Roberts can't make ACB recuse on this one. She's been sworn in already and any challenges or cases that come post swearing-in she is allowed to review/decide on.
It's a lot more than that, especially on the Supreme Court level. The parties will file briefs that'll be anywhere from 25-50 pages (with a lot of references to cases that the justices also need to read), plus procedural history and lower court filings that need to be reviewed, plus amicus curaie, which are briefs filed by non-parties, and then the justices need to hear oral arguments.
Even if it was, she could have taken a few days. Instead, she stabbed Trump in the back and allowed widespread voter fraud. She sided with the deep state instead of the rule of law, people should remember that.
I don't know if she knowingly sided with the Deep State, though it seems she was under pressure, consciously or not, to do so, and if so, she was probably intimidated by the Left, and if that's the case, she's unfit to serve as a non-biased judge, let a lone a Conservative one as many claimed.
I agree. They left no stone unturned with Kavanaugh. They used the used the most flimsy shit they could find to tear into that man and he was still seated. They'd have no reason to hold back with her and, unpopular opinion but I think she had justification for recusing herself on that specific case. She can't do it on this though.
It's gonna be funny when that picture of him compromised with children gets out and still obliterates his reputation even after he let them control his career.
Roberts maybe CJSC, but I don't think he has the ability to dismiss or refuse a Justice the ability to review or decide a case. She's a legitimate Justice.
not on the supreme court. their code of ethics specifically says that a justice is the only person that can decide to recuse themself. nobody else can make that decision, however there will always be input given and pressure from media, etc.
Can confirm. Although I was lucky enough to attend a Shelby County school with higher standards before they were sucked into the black hole that is Memphis City Schools.
A mathematician could be called as expert witness on leftist shenanigan. Any trained elementary statistician would suffice to expose their blatant, mathematically primitive crimes in election stealing and disprove all their ridiculous claims.
talking about gop not allowing vote to be counted past 4am
expecting supreme court to fight on the rules
told to separate votes? that came after the 3rd of nov
Be honest though given any of this talk is real: DO WE REALLY TRUST SCOTUS FINDS IN OUR FAVOR? Even With Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and ACB? Is there any concern they cuck out, recuse or find some reason to rule against us?
This would be great, but plays right into the narrative of "Trump is a dictator." Imagine the backlash/optics from federal troops showing up at polling stations to count votes. I think this would cost Trump a lot of his more moderate supporters in the long run, even though you and I would both love to see it happen.
It's all about order of necessary action. You first attempt the method which has clean optics. If/when that fails, then you break out the big guns. Even in that scenario, however, optics are significantly cleaned if you actually have arrests, trials, and convictions for voter fraud.
No, SCOTUS is the establishment. They favor the appearance over reality. They would sooner rule that Biden win with fraud than to call it for Trump because of fraud, because that would "diminish the faith in the court"
she wouldn’t. the dem narrative is that she needs to because she was appointed by trump, so she either explicitly cut a deal with him to rule for him in exchange for the nomination (a lie) or she will rule in his favor out of a sense of obligation for the nomination, or there is such a conflict of interest that the only ethical course is recusal. it’s all bullshit, of course. they’re just trying to get the cases argued in front of 8 justices because they know john roberts will defect and they will either win outright or tie 4-4, in which case the lower courts ruling (made in dem run states full of activist judges) is upheld.
funnily, they didn’t expect any of 0bama’s 3 picks to recuse themselves from the 0bamacare suits.
I don't think Roberts can force a recusal. There are a lot of cases of newly appointed Justices immediately reviewing elections after their appointment.
I’m not going black pill yet. I’m choosing to be optimistic and see it as though maybe God put ACB on the courts now specifically for helping Trump win if the election is contested.
How is the Q crowd any more 'wrong' than you - three days ago ranting about a Red wave in the bag or now pretending like you might do something about this fiasco?
Maybe you're an idiot too. Maybe we all are. Maybe this election is being stolen and 'the plan' was always for you to get off your ass...
is the plan a lie to you, because you have no intention of doing anything?
"How about because 0% of what those fucking morons screamed about for the last four years was true?"
So You're saying John Podesta, Hillary Clinton, Epstein, etc are innocent and exonerated of everything?
There IS no globalist problem. There IS no pedophile problem. There IS no Satanism problem. There IS no Deep State. There ARE no wealthy families. George Soros ISN'T using political activists to cause revolutions around the world..
I'm wondering if Ukraine/Biden etc was all bullshit too - because Q was talking about all of this long before anyone else..
So 20 years you've been on the inside curve... and you're upset about a plan from 2017-2020 not bearing fruition?
The lame duck isn't the Q movement, it's people who have 'known for 3 decades' and done fuck all. They also want Q to do/be fuck all so they can wash themselves of guilt for yet another opportunity squandered to do something.
There is no, and never was, a need to convince you of anything when it comes to Q. Screaming at the clouds for 4 years about it being a Larp is 4 years you've spent energy trying to stop people from 'knowing what you've known' for 3 decades.
"Q talks about other things" and "true beliebers don't need 4chan"
You're shifting from the point. You actively discourage people from looking at Q post objectively. You want them to hate it as much as you do. The fact that Q isn't all bad escapes your constantly advising we avoid it. Seems you're more fixated on making sure good people don't find other good people - than you are stopping the bad people.
In my opinion, a True Believer doesn't need gatekeepers or an excuse not to read the bible because of the source that led them to read it.
It doesn't matter if a homeless guy comes across a bible in the gutter or a dumpster. The point is he found it.
You calling Q crowd mentally ill = MSM calling us racist nazis.
It couldn't be further from the truth, so it gives you away as desperate.
You can't stand the fact people don't need to decipher anything. Any simpleton can read a posted question and figure out the answer for themselves. The only thing you're trying to accomplish is painting thousands of people you've never met with a broad ugly brush.
You don't know me, and I don't need to know you. Q has brought plenty of happiness and positive motivation into my life. When a random internet shill comes along and tries to convince me that it has led me astray - its not very convincing.
Japanese news is very clinical. They stick with confirmed fact and don't linger for sensationalism. Essentially, the Japanese news reports so far are that US law requires counting to stop at 4:00 AM, so they expect anything after to go to the Supreme Court. I haven't seen any reports advocating for Trump or Biden as the likely victor.
Why do people always post 'anon' dick wagging what many have already speculated for quite some time? If I wanted a Prophet of the Obvious, I would watch Tim Pool.
Roberts can't make ACB recuse on this one. She's been sworn in already and any challenges or cases that come post swearing-in she is allowed to review/decide on.
no reason what so ever for her to recuse none zilch
"HI MY NAME IS JEFF SESSIONS, WELCOME TO JACKASS!"
I almost pissed myself reading this. It got worse when I pictured him saying it.
I gotta find a Chelsea Handler and fast before I piss on the floor!
If ACB recuses we need to march on Washington. Period.
Enough is enough. They are not going to steal the presidency in broad daylight.
Flux. That. Shizz.
She did it once already.
She hadn't heard the case.
This.
If a case is started before a judge is appointed, it doesn't make logical sense for him/her (2 genders only) to rule on it.
That would be like voting for a bill so we can find out what is in it.
I reject your facts.
TRUTH BEFORE FACTS
I reject your HATE TRUTH
Now, where have I heard that before...hmm.
then spend your time cleaning your guns pede.
I'm not a judge and I heard the case by reading TD.
SO WHAT
She can't read 10 pages ...
It's a lot more than that, especially on the Supreme Court level. The parties will file briefs that'll be anywhere from 25-50 pages (with a lot of references to cases that the justices also need to read), plus procedural history and lower court filings that need to be reviewed, plus amicus curaie, which are briefs filed by non-parties, and then the justices need to hear oral arguments.
It wasn't more than that.
Even if it was, she could have taken a few days. Instead, she stabbed Trump in the back and allowed widespread voter fraud. She sided with the deep state instead of the rule of law, people should remember that.
I don't know if she knowingly sided with the Deep State, though it seems she was under pressure, consciously or not, to do so, and if so, she was probably intimidated by the Left, and if that's the case, she's unfit to serve as a non-biased judge, let a lone a Conservative one as many claimed.
Not a good start!
Right?
People don't enjoy being told ACB is a Robert level eel.
They really don't
Mitch went at record pace to swear in judges because of this. Trump knew the Dems would pull this shit.
If that is the case. They would have just used that "dirt" to keep her from getting seated. Then would have Biden pick a Democratic candidate.
I agree. They left no stone unturned with Kavanaugh. They used the used the most flimsy shit they could find to tear into that man and he was still seated. They'd have no reason to hold back with her and, unpopular opinion but I think she had justification for recusing herself on that specific case. She can't do it on this though.
Based off what exactly. I dont trust anybody but DJT so it's possible, but what reason do you have to believe that
Especially with the adoptions (they’re legitimate adoptions but they pervert her views).
Roberts can suck a fat cock, though. Not that he needs to be reminded as he prefers to go about his day with cum breath.
It's gonna be funny when that picture of him compromised with children gets out and still obliterates his reputation even after he let them control his career.
It is not the Supreme Court.....they will be bypassed....it is the state legislatures
Aspen Institute been preparing people for this
http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/ID/26628/1960-Hawaii-Sends-Two-Slates-to-Electoral-College.aspx
Bill and Hillary electors....
that example deserves more upvotes.
I feel there must be some good youtubes and bloggers examining the process. so much of the noise is distracting.
You can't compel someone to recuse themself, can you?
Roberts maybe CJSC, but I don't think he has the ability to dismiss or refuse a Justice the ability to review or decide a case. She's a legitimate Justice.
As far as the enumerated powers of the constitution goes, all justices are equal.
The "chief" justice is largely ceremonial, except for duties assigned to them outside hearing cases.
not on the supreme court. their code of ethics specifically says that a justice is the only person that can decide to recuse themself. nobody else can make that decision, however there will always be input given and pressure from media, etc.
I would assume not, Judge Sullivan is still in charge of General Flynn’s case, and that asshat is as jackass as you can get.
Taiwan reporting that it's statistically impossible for Biden to win.
Asian maths > honky maths
Can confirm. I attended high school in Memphis TN, and democrat maffs was 6th grade level.
Can confirm. Although I was lucky enough to attend a Shelby County school with higher standards before they were sucked into the black hole that is Memphis City Schools.
A mathematician could be called as expert witness on leftist shenanigan. Any trained elementary statistician would suffice to expose their blatant, mathematically primitive crimes in election stealing and disprove all their ridiculous claims.
AsianVoter has spoken. Math ftw.
Best China.
Need a source on that. Preferably something in English.
Taiwan knows a thing or two about fake governments
He will sell them out in a NY minute.
Best China knows the deal. Biden wins, Taiwan falls.
Japanese pedes please source and confirm translation? I want to believe there are other based spots left on this planet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRe6GxgNi-A
talking about gop not allowing vote to be counted past 4am expecting supreme court to fight on the rules told to separate votes? that came after the 3rd of nov
no need i can read japanese. Just post the article. I have seen none so far
Based. How long did it take you to learn, or are you bilingual?
Took it up as a 2nd language 10 years ago? Anyway prpbably a lie this post
Be honest though given any of this talk is real: DO WE REALLY TRUST SCOTUS FINDS IN OUR FAVOR? Even With Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and ACB? Is there any concern they cuck out, recuse or find some reason to rule against us?
i like this , FUCK optics ....what good have they done us up till now? fight fire with fire IF ONLY
This would be great, but plays right into the narrative of "Trump is a dictator." Imagine the backlash/optics from federal troops showing up at polling stations to count votes. I think this would cost Trump a lot of his more moderate supporters in the long run, even though you and I would both love to see it happen.
Optics are still mildly important if this ever ends in a true civil war/street fight.
Optics for moderate, less informed Trump supporters. We will need them in the long run.
Who cares? We need to win NOW
he doesn't need moderate supporters anymore. The votes have been cast
It's all about order of necessary action. You first attempt the method which has clean optics. If/when that fails, then you break out the big guns. Even in that scenario, however, optics are significantly cleaned if you actually have arrests, trials, and convictions for voter fraud.
Trump is only only "politician" that's given us a reason to trust them. Everyone else has a LONG way to go to earn it.
Hell no they are all swamp creatures
this is the answer. if our checks and balances are compromised we have no other option
No, SCOTUS is the establishment. They favor the appearance over reality. They would sooner rule that Biden win with fraud than to call it for Trump because of fraud, because that would "diminish the faith in the court"
Don't rely on scotus here.
Roberts can’t make a justice recuse. He does not have that power.
Exactly. What kindamalarkey is this
I am Worried about how little fight they put up against ACB, for Democrat standards they practically rolled out the red carpet for her.
she is a woman
she will crack
a virtue signaling, african baby adopter nonetheless.
That’s exactly why I didn’t want her. If you virtue signal in adoptions you’re disqualified.
Ditto, but didn't want to be banned for concern trolling.
Same
she bent the knee for the LGBTXYZ community. That told me everything.
Got a source for that? Would be very exciting to see if real.
I'd love to see some of these based Japanese news reports
I’d say everyone here knew this was the plan back in April
Sometimes it sucks to be right.
Post w a source or GTFO shill.
Link to Japan news article?
Why would ACB need to recuse herself?
she wouldn’t. the dem narrative is that she needs to because she was appointed by trump, so she either explicitly cut a deal with him to rule for him in exchange for the nomination (a lie) or she will rule in his favor out of a sense of obligation for the nomination, or there is such a conflict of interest that the only ethical course is recusal. it’s all bullshit, of course. they’re just trying to get the cases argued in front of 8 justices because they know john roberts will defect and they will either win outright or tie 4-4, in which case the lower courts ruling (made in dem run states full of activist judges) is upheld.
funnily, they didn’t expect any of 0bama’s 3 picks to recuse themselves from the 0bamacare suits.
I would love to see this Japan news. If that anon posts a link someone update me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRe6GxgNi-A&ab_channel=ANNnewsCH
Sorry, but could you please post thread?
I'm at murderous already and I can't go through another fucking array of Jojo Biden memes to find the context of this post.
Why the fuvk would ACB recuse? She has the same qualifications and confirmation as every other judge
All these judges who have presided over decades of shitting on the constitution should recuse themselves.
OH that only leaves 3 not recused.
I don't think Roberts can force a recusal. There are a lot of cases of newly appointed Justices immediately reviewing elections after their appointment.
Anyone got links?
LOL, a chan post! Take off your tinfoil hat and don't believe what you read on chan.
Link? I can read Japanese.
sauce?
The justices cannot be told to recuse themselves, It is their decision. Robert's can't tell ACB to do anything.
I’m not going black pill yet. I’m choosing to be optimistic and see it as though maybe God put ACB on the courts now specifically for helping Trump win if the election is contested.
If ACB refuses them the SC will be deadlocked 4-4 more likely. Who would he get to vote with him?
ACB had virtue signaling adoptions, we’re fucked.
Based Japan doing the Lord's work!
Roberts can't make ACB do anything, more than likely she recused on the Penn. case because she hadn't heard the original arguments the first time.
Now would be a great time for Sessions to wake up from his nap like the LARPers promised.
How is the Q crowd any more 'wrong' than you - three days ago ranting about a Red wave in the bag or now pretending like you might do something about this fiasco?
Maybe you're an idiot too. Maybe we all are. Maybe this election is being stolen and 'the plan' was always for you to get off your ass...
is the plan a lie to you, because you have no intention of doing anything?
So You're saying John Podesta, Hillary Clinton, Epstein, etc are innocent and exonerated of everything?
There IS no globalist problem. There IS no pedophile problem. There IS no Satanism problem. There IS no Deep State. There ARE no wealthy families. George Soros ISN'T using political activists to cause revolutions around the world..
I'm wondering if Ukraine/Biden etc was all bullshit too - because Q was talking about all of this long before anyone else..
Wow, since the late 90s?
So 20 years you've been on the inside curve... and you're upset about a plan from 2017-2020 not bearing fruition?
The lame duck isn't the Q movement, it's people who have 'known for 3 decades' and done fuck all. They also want Q to do/be fuck all so they can wash themselves of guilt for yet another opportunity squandered to do something.
There is no, and never was, a need to convince you of anything when it comes to Q. Screaming at the clouds for 4 years about it being a Larp is 4 years you've spent energy trying to stop people from 'knowing what you've known' for 3 decades.
Good job.
I don't need Q to tell me how fucked you are.
This site is 50% Q followers and half the posts you read here were originally posted by Q hours beforehand.
Q talks about God more than any other source aside from Trump.
I find it hard to align with people who are SO against people finding God, or strength in him.
Nice straw man argument.
"Q talks about other things" and "true beliebers don't need 4chan"
You're shifting from the point. You actively discourage people from looking at Q post objectively. You want them to hate it as much as you do. The fact that Q isn't all bad escapes your constantly advising we avoid it. Seems you're more fixated on making sure good people don't find other good people - than you are stopping the bad people.
In my opinion, a True Believer doesn't need gatekeepers or an excuse not to read the bible because of the source that led them to read it.
It doesn't matter if a homeless guy comes across a bible in the gutter or a dumpster. The point is he found it.
You calling Q crowd mentally ill = MSM calling us racist nazis.
It couldn't be further from the truth, so it gives you away as desperate.
You can't stand the fact people don't need to decipher anything. Any simpleton can read a posted question and figure out the answer for themselves. The only thing you're trying to accomplish is painting thousands of people you've never met with a broad ugly brush.
You don't know me, and I don't need to know you. Q has brought plenty of happiness and positive motivation into my life. When a random internet shill comes along and tries to convince me that it has led me astray - its not very convincing.
Roberts can't make her recuse herself.
Roberts raped me 35 years ago, that's why I have two front doors.
Roberts should recuse Himself.
"I have no clear memories of the incident or the surrounding details, and nobody can vouch for me, but it definitely happened. Believe all women."
whats your source? oh, a 4chan post describing a Japanese news source that is not named?
Awesome, we can all stop worrying now guys!
Japanese news is very clinical. They stick with confirmed fact and don't linger for sensationalism. Essentially, the Japanese news reports so far are that US law requires counting to stop at 4:00 AM, so they expect anything after to go to the Supreme Court. I haven't seen any reports advocating for Trump or Biden as the likely victor.
I hope that if Canada is mentally ill to declare war with the US, that Japan will join the US against Canada.
FUCK Roberts! NeoCon shill...
Any links to English stories???
There will be consequences!
Pelosi has been telegraphing their plan for months.
Japanese media with the truth. All the voter fraud is right there for everyone to see, but US media is "nope, nothing to see here"
Make. No.
Why do people always post 'anon' dick wagging what many have already speculated for quite some time? If I wanted a Prophet of the Obvious, I would watch Tim Pool.
Is there a link to the Japanese article or news outlet?
There needs to be an anime made about this ASAP.
I didn't think Japan could be more based than they already are, and now this
BASED ANIME WAIFU MERCHANTS