They won't support him. ACB recused herself. And the judges are all corrupt in these "contested states". The AG's are owned by Soros and so are the judges.
She recused herself from the decisions prior to the vote, because she didn't have the time to properly rule on those. How would that make her recusal also cover a recount situation / post election ruling?
They won't support him. ACB recused herself. And the judges are all corrupt in these "contested states". The AG's are owned by Soros and so are the judges.
She recused herself from the decisions prior to the vote, because she didn't have the time to properly rule on those. How would that make her recusal also cover a recount situation / post election ruling?