Yeah, I'm not sure. I just know that people were saying the whole Wisconsin votes being >100% was erroneous also. The 138,000 jump at 4 am in Michigan and Wisconsin to Trump's 0 jump could be viewed by anyone and it boggles the mind. I just know there is a danger in supporting something that is easily discredited, especially if a dummy like me can notice a little discrepancy like the unique misspelling of a word, then it may cause other people to call it into question. If we get busted for backing something that turns out to be not true, it will be a net negative. We have to pick the right battles.
good catch. poisoning the well? to invalidate all fraud as fake because of this
Yeah, I'm not sure. I just know that people were saying the whole Wisconsin votes being >100% was erroneous also. The 138,000 jump at 4 am in Michigan and Wisconsin to Trump's 0 jump could be viewed by anyone and it boggles the mind. I just know there is a danger in supporting something that is easily discredited, especially if a dummy like me can notice a little discrepancy like the unique misspelling of a word, then it may cause other people to call it into question. If we get busted for backing something that turns out to be not true, it will be a net negative. We have to pick the right battles.