1545
Comments (49)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
LFCIRE96 5 points ago +13 / -8

That’s unconstitutional.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
georock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any amendment wouldn't rake effect until after the current president term was over

2
permissible_missile 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's really not. It's wishful, emotional thinking.

2
JaquesoCheese 2 points ago +3 / -1

No, it’s not. A term is a term. All presidents face opposition.

4
usausausa5000 4 points ago +5 / -1

All presidents have had to deal with a coup attempt

lol wut

4
hit_backspace 4 points ago +4 / -0

When was the last time the democrats respected the constitution?

Although a 3rd term realistically would never happen, it represents dirty tactics we must use to fight the left.

4
abuv 4 points ago +4 / -0

was FDR's 3rd term unconstitutional?

1
LFCIRE96 1 point ago +1 / -0

They changed it in 1951

1
Donarudo_Taranpu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unconstitutional has been the name of the game for decades now. Time for the commies to get a little taste. Twelve more years!