I think this is good news. Dems have to respond by tomorrow so a ruling can be made by Fri. Trump joined the suit. It was rejected before due to lack of standing. Now there is someone who is hurt by the election officials not following PA law and ACB will make the SC ruling 5-4 in favor of Trump
After reading what you say then re-reading article, it sounds like you're right. If so, the Times article really failed to explain the significance (or lack) of the court's move so laymen can understand it.
Well if trump loses it's time to put up or shut up. I honestly have nothing to lose after the chinese virus and dems destroying the economy. I will not allow them this coup after hillary and obama got away.
“The justices had split 4-4 on the issue earlier this month, leaving the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling in place, which let votes be counted beyond Nov. 3”
If the ruling let votes be counted beyond Nov. 3, how can Trumps team argue otherwise?
because that means SCC ended up not ruling, which means they still have that option now that there is a tie breaker.
Except now the court would have to dismiss ballots of people that were told it was ok to mail them late. I don't think this is a big win. At best the court might close the gap of making it clearly postmarked by Nov 3 - but that's unlikely to affect many of the fake ones unless Dems are really retarded.
I think this is good news. Dems have to respond by tomorrow so a ruling can be made by Fri. Trump joined the suit. It was rejected before due to lack of standing. Now there is someone who is hurt by the election officials not following PA law and ACB will make the SC ruling 5-4 in favor of Trump
After reading what you say then re-reading article, it sounds like you're right. If so, the Times article really failed to explain the significance (or lack) of the court's move so laymen can understand it.
I concur with this reading of the ruling.
Tactical nuke launched
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=feSQXluAQTw - Relevant
This is gonna get NASTY
If this can be decided by the supreme court at this point, that would be least nasty outcome. It's gonna be decided with violence if it fails.
Now thats a white pill boys.
It's OK to be white pill.
This is why god sent RBG to hell
RBG but yes
Lmao sorry I’m used to typing rgb (red green blue )
haha i know im just fucking with you love you fren
I know is okay fren <3
Meanwhile they still keep printing out and tallying biden ballots.
Exactly. They need to go in there by force and close it down.
Incoming wrist slap
The second amendment was made for the people to keep the government in check.
We just are never allowed to use it as a defense lol
Well if trump loses it's time to put up or shut up. I honestly have nothing to lose after the chinese virus and dems destroying the economy. I will not allow them this coup after hillary and obama got away.
...not for this
This is the best news I've seen all day
legalese pedes, I demand you labor for free and start handing out legal analysis in the thread.
God still loved USA and saved her from globalists by giving us Trump in 2016. God would not abandon His child only 4 years later.
“The justices had split 4-4 on the issue earlier this month, leaving the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling in place, which let votes be counted beyond Nov. 3”
If the ruling let votes be counted beyond Nov. 3, how can Trumps team argue otherwise?
because that means SCC ended up not ruling, which means they still have that option now that there is a tie breaker.
Except now the court would have to dismiss ballots of people that were told it was ok to mail them late. I don't think this is a big win. At best the court might close the gap of making it clearly postmarked by Nov 3 - but that's unlikely to affect many of the fake ones unless Dems are really retarded.
good news
I love this damn site. Haha
Fuck Roberts.
Look where we are now.
Coward.