89
WATERMARKS CONFIRMED (twitter.com) 🌶️🌶️ SPICY🌶️🌶️
posted ago by wholesomekangz100 ago by wholesomekangz100 +90 / -1
Comments (16)
sorted by:
21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
8
thunderpussy 8 points ago +8 / -0

I agree totally.

4
SwedishCrusader 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also, it may only be in California.

1
skeet_shooter 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they were smart they would have had 2 watermarks. 1 for official ballots, 2nd for official ballots that they new were going to be fraudulent if returned (e.g. some cuck that died in 1984 and has been voting ever since).

They would catch the unofficial ballots, and if any came in with the 2nd they can investigate fraud.

2
jezbro 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can use blockchain to identify the source of the ballot. If they did it correctly, they could even have a particular dot key for each county and state so they would be able to tell which ballots came from other counties. Essentially each person would have a unique identifier in their voting district.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
SMEOwner 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes. The cheating is done by stealing ballots from people and signing as them

2
TrumpTrain2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unless they had batches of ballots ahead of time to get in place logistically...

But where did they come from?

GEOTUS had a take on that.

5
RSSNBOT 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's just the texture of the paper. I don't think this theory is right.

4
Kerra_Holt 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is why the democrats pushed so hard for mass mail-in ballots. They wanted to flood the mail with ballots that they could harvest - AUTHENTIC BALLOTS - to fill out ahead of time and get ready for election day. I guarantee the majority of ballots would be AUTHENTIC but the voters themselves ARE NOT.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
2scoops2terms 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s a penis!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0