6065
Comments (259)
sorted by:
149
dovfer 149 points ago +153 / -4

joe's party

78
fapoo 78 points ago +78 / -0

Vote for the Corpse party!

CORPSES 2020

29
lixa 29 points ago +29 / -0

Makes the long dark winter easier to bear.

15
Methodmapper 15 points ago +15 / -0
  • BIDEN IS A CHEAT
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
23
SurrenderFreeman 23 points ago +23 / -0

I hear the After party was a graveyard smash.

5
Harambe4K 5 points ago +5 / -0

I heard it was to die for

16
SpezDispenser 16 points ago +16 / -0

Legit lmfao.

Seriously how can anyone be a lib? We're the party of kek.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
10
HashtagWinningDicks 10 points ago +10 / -0

All hail the Corpse Emperor!!

6
24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
20
deleted 20 points ago +21 / -1 (edited)
10
Wishiwastrumpswife 10 points ago +10 / -0

I’m from MI and some of our republicans fight for us. We managed to get a recall petition out and Whitlers powers are limited.

7
deleted 7 points ago +9 / -2
4
ReggieTabasco 4 points ago +4 / -0

McCarthy is out there at least spreading some good words. Paul Ryan would have done the opposite and backstab Trump. I will remember that. You can always see a person’s true colors when the chips are down.

1
Mrsattorney 1 point ago +1 / -0

By the time we're done with all of this, we will likely find that the Dems stole the election from Pierre Delecto/Ryan too.

1
stormcloud 1 point ago +1 / -0

What Tewi said.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)
8
okayfilet 8 points ago +8 / -0

Where are republicans in general? Did I miss something or didn't any representative come out to call out the irregularities?

27
100percentdeplorable 27 points ago +27 / -0

Hijacking top comment to say this -

Can someone please tell Flecca's that there are a LOT more voters supposedly over 110 years old registered in Michigan.

According my analysis there are 2364 registered voters in Michigan over 110. I have a CSV file of them here - https://gofile.io/d/KnNTij

If you don't trust downloading a random file I've included a list of the first ~200 in a pastebin (the file is too big to paste it all in a pastebin) - https://pastebin.com/XeSrbhj1

More data and analysis here - https://thedonald.win/p/11PpBIHOgm/michigan-voter-registration-data/

10
RexCollumSilvarum 10 points ago +10 / -0

According my analysis there are 2364 registered voters in Michigan over 110.

There aren't 2364 people aged over 110 in the whole United States.

In fact, there haven't been that many people living that long in the entire world combined, for all of recorded history.

And yet yesterday they all rose from their graves to vote for Joe.

5
100percentdeplorable 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well perhaps I didn't word that the most clearly.

There are 2364 people registered in the voter rolls in Michigan, who, if they were alive, would be over 110 years old. Obviously almost all those those people are actually dead.

2
DonJr2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

ADDITIONAL IDEA:

If you live in or have friends in one of these last States, and know someone who died in the last couple years, maybe we can check if they yet voted.

Like if you have a liberal friend whose dad died 2 years ago, pop in their info and see if they voted.

1
Everight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another thing to check for is voter registration address. If voters are fraudulent we should be able to see population density irregularities, 10 people living in a house fit for 5, etc.

If data is available for votes by precinct, we can also see statistical irregularities in these.

I have some experience with big data of this type, and would be glad to join an effort to comb through the voter registration and actual results.

9
Sand313man 9 points ago +9 / -0

Why would republicans care?

I ask honestly..

These are all establishment politicians democrats and republicans... they have some little cute bickering since the public eye.. the. Just exchange power every few years. They all keep their seats..

When people talk about the Kissinger era of establishment politics - that includes Nixon bush clintons Obama..

Hillary was even called out by Bernie for Kissinger being her biggest “mentor”.

When trump had a run in with the bushes and McCain - even Schwarzenegger, it’s because these are part of the establishment.

Honestly - Tuilsi gabbard of the democrats is at least non establishment and truthful.

Both republicans and democrats are snakes.

You want a populist base? If trump ever gets through this you need to ditch the elephant for the lion once and for all.

3
okayfilet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, you're right on every level. Now or never. Use the Trump Train to break up the two party system. If Trump's party doesn't have enough votes for a majority in four years, they could collaborate with the pathetic remains of the Republicans, but they wouldn't be bound by the established, corrupted system of the two parties.

There was a time without the Democrat/Republican system. There is no reason to think these two parties will even exist in 30 years.

2
Sand313man 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean you have to take over the republicans unfortunately.. which is why it’s so important for trump to get another term - and hopefully finally rebrand to the lion.

Honestly trumps main goal in my eyes for his next term is to open up economy - fix the election system - endorse “lions” and capture systemically the entire Republican electorate.

It’s hard however because trump despite his wealth - is still a poor man in this game. He is up against billion dollar industries out to get him.

20
thereisonlydon 20 points ago +21 / -1

Not that I mind, does anybody know any history how Democrats always end up being the sus cheaters? Any noteable examples.

25
deleted 25 points ago +27 / -2
-7
deleted -7 points ago +5 / -12
11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
-11
deleted -11 points ago +2 / -13
17
knnbccb 17 points ago +17 / -0

The ends justify the means for the lefties. Moral reprobates.

14
PraiseBeToScience 14 points ago +14 / -0

Because they're psychotic, ideological zealots and their politics is their religion, so like an ISIS suicide bomber about to blow up a wedding, they think every means is justified by the end.

13
Stellariagazer 13 points ago +13 / -0

2018 election in CA after Governor Joe Brown passed the ballot harvesting bill. Many red county in both CA and Arizona flip blue out of no where. County that have been red for decades. The bill pass but no one knew what it was.

9
UpTrump 9 points ago +10 / -1

Democrats thrive on power and control. People naturally want to be free, so the democrats often have to force people (cheat) to get their way

4
Bornonthe1stofJuly 4 points ago +4 / -0 (edited)

They like how he acts like one of them.

111
Wtf_socialismreally 111 points ago +112 / -1

"You are on the permanent absentee voter list. You will be sent an application for every election"

First of all: Holy shit what the fuck is that bullshit?

Second of all: This does not look good for Democrats.

52
dontUseVinegerAsLube [S] 52 points ago +53 / -1

Robert Barnes with Viva raised many good points - one of them was prove a few dead people's votes in courts. That would demand a re-count.

30
WallEagle 30 points ago +32 / -2

What if Trump votes have already been dumped?? Recount won't work then.

37
Fabian 37 points ago +38 / -1

If the second count has less votes for Trump than the first and way less than Republican registrations it would raise even more questions

22
WallEagle 22 points ago +23 / -1

LMAO, now they'll print ballots for Trump. I hope they counted the ones they burnt.

13
Wtf_socialismreally 13 points ago +13 / -0

Tinfoil hat could say that's a plan to further destabilize this and make it look like Trump attempted to cheat.

I really hope that the hidden marks for official ballots pans out.

9
RexCollumSilvarum 9 points ago +9 / -0

I really hope that the hidden marks for official ballots pans out.

Don't all printers put tiny hidden marks on the things they print, to aid in investigation of things like counterfeit currency?

9
thereal____ 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes. Just finished reading a book that devoted a lot of time explaining it. Get this, it was about how the CIA uses it to discredit and prove origins of documents!

4
GroSweng 4 points ago +4 / -0

The printers that print ballots probably don't.

11
preferredfault 11 points ago +11 / -0

I think the point is, a recount will not find ballots that were thrown away before they were counted, and the number wouldn't change. We need more than recounts. We need ballots directly analyzed.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
6
TypicalEd 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's about time. They must fight the ugly fraud. It got so bad because Republicans ran from the fight every time. Now is not the time to run because letting the dims have their way is easier. Fight it out. This is about more than just Trump winning. This is about ripping away the fraud machine from dims.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
WallEagle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks, good news.

The thing is, none of the things that've happened was a surprise. All were expected. It'll be really surprising if Trump team don't have a counter-response.

2
lurkwellmyfriends 2 points ago +2 / -0

We shouldn't accept this no matter what. We should be rioting in the streets.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
2
jsmith81 2 points ago +2 / -0

If votes have been dumped, there also wouldn't be a way to prove the dead voters voted democrat. They obviously did, but I'm just saying, there would be no way to turn this state into a Trump state without a recount, no matter how you turn it..

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
jsmith81 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have no clue. Anyway I made that comment a couple of hours ago, since then, people have found the "dead" people, and apparently they're alive but had their age set wrong (name, address, zip code & everything else matching).

I think the best realistic thing we could hope for is that they haven't thrown away any ballots, and that they do a re-count with Republican observers. But again, I simply don't know.

1
wethedownvoted 1 point ago +1 / -0

rioting will burn up the ballots if it looks like a recount will happen

1
DonJr2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. If anyone knows someone who died in the last couple years in one of these States, try and put in their info and see if they "voted".

If we had even 100 clear cases of a dead person voting, and if they are able to see that they all voted for Biden, that's it. It's done. New vote, declare for Trump, whatever.

19
UpTrump 19 points ago +19 / -0

Twitter is silencing all mention of this. According to them and the media, there is "nothing to see here"

9
orange_dit 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well dead people are certainly absent...

2
Toohershat 2 points ago +2 / -0

There were 2.6M residents in Wayne Co in Michigan in 1970, now there are 1.7M residents. How many people who have died there in the last 50 years are still on the voter rolls?

100
SayonaraShitbird 100 points ago +101 / -1

Working with some other guys in that thread, I'm grabbing all of the dead people data from 1900 on and we wrote an API wrapper for Michigan's vote check. Tomorrow we'll be able to run through thousands of names programmatically. Fuck the dems.

56
TexasLawDog 56 points ago +56 / -0

Glad somebody learned to code.

26
bear__aware 26 points ago +26 / -0

Should we be doing this for other states also?

Where are you getting the dead people data from though? That seems like it would not be public. Sure there are obituaries in local newspapers and so you could infer name and zip code maybe but not birth date, not to mention it would be super hard to systematically scrape this.

I could pretty easily take on at least some portion of this work for another state. I am on mobile at the moment, stuck waiting for an oil change but I will try to catch up on twatter soon.

21
SayonaraShitbird 21 points ago +21 / -0

I'm starting here: https://sortedbybirthdate.com/small_pages/1903/19030101_1001.html

since it's all html with incrementing filenames I'm looping through and grabbing everything from 1900-1999.We've already got a parser for the data it's just taking a while to download it all.

19
dingdongbob 19 points ago +19 / -0

Michigan has an obituary website: https://obits.mlive.com

This link gives you all of the people who died in the Detroit area: https://obits.mlive.com/obituaries/southeast-michigan/obituary-search.aspx?daterange=30&countryid=1&stateid=26&affiliateid=all

It isn't as clean as the link you posted, but it gives you a comprehensive list of people who died in michigan. obituaries typically give you birth dates, and you can just brute force the zip code (can narrow down the list of zip codes by the region their obituary was listed in).

6
DonJr2024 6 points ago +6 / -0

Awesome. We need to check these. Recent deaths seem like the easiest target for fraud. Or even just loony liberals who return their dead dad's vote and think it is justified by "orange man bad".

2
Light_HIV_Effect 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, anyone that died before absentee/mail-in ballots were sent out are certainly fraud.

7
100percentdeplorable 7 points ago +7 / -0

Is that data different from the death data downloadable here? - http://ssdmf.info/download.html They seem to be run by the same people.

Also if you want to share the code for the API checker I can spin up a few VMs and try hitting the voter registration lookup for a few other states as well.

1
bear__aware 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey any update on this? I've got a script now which can do about 1300 requests against Wisconsin per minute, or 1,872,000 per 24hrs.

The full SSDMF data from here http://ssdmf.info/download.html has 90 Million records which don't say what state they are from. It would take a bit too long for me to run all these people against Wisconsin.

The sortedbybirthdate.com data has information on what state they died in so then I could restrict to Wisconsin, and probably have the querying done in a day or two.

11
RexCollumSilvarum 11 points ago +11 / -0

Should we be doing this for other states also?

We should; they undoubtedly cheated in every state.

Even the slam-dunk donkey states like California would benefit from a landslide Biden victory instead of a narrow one as that makes their narrow "victories" in battleground states look legitimate, and a higher national popular vote also gives them ammunition to claim that Trump doesn't have a mandate if by some chance they lose.

5
DrVeryStableGEOTUS 5 points ago +5 / -0

We should on every state that doesn’t have CAPTCHA on their voter lookup form.

Unfortunately that would mean creating a API new wrapper for every state though.

1
bear__aware 1 point ago +1 / -0

Focusing on the battleground states narrows it down a lot, enough that I think we might have enough people to put 1 person on each to deal with each unique api.

Maybe we can work up a list of which of those states have CAPTCHAs or otherwise are obviously not amenable to automation. I have only looked at MI and WI so far.

11
dissin_nips 11 points ago +11 / -0

I wrote up a script to take all of the voters from the MI voter rolls that are aged 95 or older (so it's just an estimate of who is fairly likely deceased), and then dumped them into a csv/google sheet.

I'm not sure if there's any overlap, or if you or anybody else can use it, but I'll paste the link here in case others could use the data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qWoOOr6QT1sJ5sJpjxQswqA2slocDbt3MfMsVZqAeQo/edit?usp=sharing

The sheet is 2,481 entries with the first name, last name, birth year, zip code, and some other fields. The only thing I think it would lack for calling the MI ballot check is the birth month, but maybe you can save yourself some trouble by only calling their site with what you see in my CSV which has registered voters? (that way you are not making a call for every single deceased person, whether they are registered to vote or not). So basically just only call from your screen scraped entries what is also found in the voter rolls from my csv. Might save some time.

11
100percentdeplorable 11 points ago +11 / -0

Where are you getting the voter rolls from? I found 2364 registered voters over 110 years old in Michigan, here's a CSV - https://gofile.io/d/KnNTij

I'm getting my registration data from here - https://michiganvoters.info/ http://69.64.83.144/~mi/download/20201012/

6
dissin_nips 6 points ago +6 / -0

I am going off of the file in your second link I believe, labeled "Entire State October..> 2020-10-23 22:35 560M"

I cannot see any file for download on your CSV link. But it seems we may be working off the same data based on your source link.

8
100percentdeplorable 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ok. The way you worded your original comment I thought you found another source where we could scrape voter registration data. I haven't been able to find a good source for Wisconsin voter roll data yet. Wisconsin is even closer than Michigan.

Wisconsin does sell its voter registration data for a whopping $12,500... https://elections.wi.gov/clerks/svrs/voter-data perhaps someone bought it and made it public?

4
TeachersUnionsSUCK 4 points ago +4 / -0

Someone here should be able to bypass this.. or we could buy it if crowdsourced.

5
100percentdeplorable 5 points ago +5 / -0

Naa not worth it unless someone else already bought it and made it public on their website/github or something. Even if 100 people pool together money that's still $125 from each person. Way too expensive.

The more effective route is to get all the death records in the US and have a bunch of people run checker programs against the Wisconsin voter portal API... if they have rate limiters we could bypass it with rotating proxies. People are already working on it.

4
dissin_nips 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jeeze! That's an INSANE price tag! What a bummer. :(

4
100percentdeplorable 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes it is. States are required to disclose voter registration data under FOIA but that doesn't stop them from charging you a pretty penny for it...

1
DonJr2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only 12 birth months and I doubt they made it lock out for bad attempts.

10
dasitmane 10 points ago +11 / -1

nice. how does one learn these, can anyone point a resource? would like to help too. i only know some bits of python from doing a couple udemy courses

17
SayonaraShitbird 17 points ago +17 / -0

What you need are projects to work on now, and google your way through them. You'll learn best by hitting walls and working your way around them. Think of some problems you could solve or things that would make what you do on your computer easier. Write something that'll grab the headlines from your favorite news sites and email them to you. The only way to get better is to dive in.

3
DrVeryStableGEOTUS 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://youtu.be/XjNm9bazxn8

This is the concept, but it’s not easy to jump into.

3
Feelthederp2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

What’s the chances of them disabling the web front end for us to check it?

58
PraiseBeToScience 58 points ago +59 / -1

Literally all mail-in ballots should be tossed for this alone. They're all suspect and can't be proven anymore.

At worst, redo the election, in-person only.

42
TexasLawDog 42 points ago +42 / -0

Would be a Trump landslide with no mail in

32
deleted 32 points ago +33 / -1
6
lurkwellmyfriends 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's why we should not accept. Riot and revolt when it's time.

7
Stellariagazer 7 points ago +8 / -1

Not only that but even democrats will see how badly their party cheated.

8
WallEagle 8 points ago +11 / -3

LMAO, then Trump is reelected easily. But is it possible to redo the election? Does SCOTUS make that decision? And what kind of proof does it need? (Europede here, don't know how it works there)

13
Wtf_socialismreally 13 points ago +14 / -1

I think a nation-wide re-do is unprecedented, but it could be necessary.

11
trozz 11 points ago +11 / -0

The mass mail-in ballots and some states basically prohibiting in-person voting are already unprecedented.

They’re already operating on no rules, so the fuck are we always tip-toeing around them?

10
Wtf_socialismreally 10 points ago +10 / -0

Trump either has a big brain 4D catch-them-in-the-act plan with this ballot thing going around; I have trouble with "trust the plans" at this point personally.

Or he's trying to win it totally legitimately, by the rules, because he knows he's the only one who can properly do the much needed election reform after this.

1
DahRage 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yep. Nothing like a redo has ever been done. If they choose to go that route, they would have to make the new election day a "national holiday" and make sure everyone has a day off work or something. Or maybe spread it over a weekend.

It's a good idea, but I would be worried about people out of state or in the military not being able to vote without time for absentee ballots.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
DahRage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then how would military vote? Changes would have to be made (for the better, of course!).

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
48
Italians_Invented_2A 48 points ago +48 / -0

We must demand that from now on the voter lists are deleted every election. You need to register again for every election.

But muh voter suppression

24
womp-womp-twice 24 points ago +24 / -0

oNLy fOuR yEaRs tO rEgIsTeR iS nOt eNoUgH fOr BiPoCs!!! vOhTahR sUpPrExSiOn!!!!!

6
stormcloud 6 points ago +7 / -1

That's a good idea; along with voter ID -- national requirement. It's not foolproof, but it's something.

7
Italians_Invented_2A 7 points ago +7 / -0

And another good idea is that there should be one single national database.

This is to prevent people from being registered at two different places, which is very easy for e.g. college students.

6
stormcloud 6 points ago +6 / -0

Honestly, we don't need that -- we just need voter ID and no more registration drives. The Dems in the area do like to do registration drives on the campuses. No, that should be everybody's personal obligation -- if they're too lazy to get to their county courthouse or DMV and get registered to vote. (I'd probably take away the DMV option.)

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's right. One should show active interest to participate in the democratic process. It's a feature, not a flaw of the system.

5
stormcloud 5 points ago +5 / -0

I also believe there should be no party affiliations. No more of this R versus D with a side order of L, G, Qwerty. Run all the candidates together on individual platforms; we get to chose who we want. But that's just me. Political parties make for party machine politics, a push for low information voting, and it's killing us (in my opinion).

44
computer7723 44 points ago +46 / -2

gold comment "Ok I think we're looking at this all wrong, the Dems have found a way to bring people back to life to vote!!!! We're missing the bigger picture here"

38
MustafaJones 38 points ago +39 / -1

WTF why are the dead still enrolled to vote? Why is the election system this vulnerable? This is unequivocal evidence of fraud.

5
stormcloud 5 points ago +5 / -0

It happened with my mom, dad, and fil. Their names didn't get removed from the roll when they died...for some reason (oversight would be the innocent explanation -- and probably is, both are red counties). Fortunately, we were made aware of it and called the county clerk, got them removed (to the best of our knowledge). But I'm sure that doesn't happen all the time, so it would be easy to find those people on a voter roll and have them vote for who you wanted if you were running a large organization devoted to getting your guy into office.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
26
Kekception 26 points ago +26 / -0

Keep digging

23
aussie_maga 23 points ago +23 / -0

Pedes here focusing on "memes" when they should be doing work like this.

19
Benjamin 19 points ago +19 / -0

To be fair, we need both. Memes strengthen the numbers.

11
Wtf_socialismreally 11 points ago +11 / -0

This site is basically a war room at this point anyway. Memes are there, but almost everything being touched right now is focused on serious election stuff.

Memes are just there to cheer the people sorting through this, parsing and discussing it for dissemination up.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
19
StraightWhiteCisMale 19 points ago +19 / -0

Shouldn’t the autists be on this?

11
fapoo 11 points ago +11 / -0

day 1 election i heard 4chan went down, not heard anything about them about this, any users of 4chan know whats going on with them?

16
revere 16 points ago +16 / -0 (edited)

I have not been able to verify that any of these people are dead. Before we start mobbing a bunch of old people, lets double check info.

So far this is what I'm seeing:

June Aiken (June A. Aiken) appears to currently be 94 years old. Her husband, Floyd Junior Aiken passed away in 2015 at the age of 92 and she is listed as "his beloved wife of over 68 years, June A. (Saunt)":
https://obits.mlive.com/obituaries/annarbor/obituary.aspx?n=floyd-junior-aiken&pid=174429043&fhid=21030

It appears that June A. Aiken is still alive.

Donna Brydges of Ludington appears to really be in her 70s:
https://www.whitepages.com/name/Donna-Brydges

That being said, this should all be investigated more.

Another one mentioned Robert Brock, appears to actually be 48. Not sure if registered twice or two different people (maybe father and son)
https://mvic.sos.state.mi.us/Voter/Index
(ballot sent but does not appear to be counted)
First Name: Robert
Last Name: Brock
Birth Month: January
Birth Year: 1900
Zip: 48203
https://voterrecords.com/voter/20003213/robert-brock

(ballot does not appear to have been requested - not sure if voting was attempted)
First Name: Robert
Last Name: Brock
Birth Month: October
Birth Year: 1972
Zip: 48235
https://voterrecords.com/voter/20329620/robert-brock

One of the other ones mentioned was William Bradley. This one is a little weird. There is a William T Bradley and William Bradley (father and son at the same address). Father passed away but two ballots were sent out. If you search for the name here:
https://voterrecords.com/voters/detroit-mi/william+bradley/1

You'll see the two are at the 48207 zip code. One has a status of "Challenged" (the father's - I think this was one of the records that was actually challenged and started everything) and one has a status of "Active". I'm wondering if the 59 year old son returned the wrong ballot (only one is marked as received).

You can check it on the official site:
https://mvic.sos.state.mi.us/Voter/Index
SON (no ballot returned)
First Name: William
Last Name: Bradley
Birth Month: July
Birth Year: 1959
Zip: 48207

FATHER (ballot appears to be challenged based on voterrecords.com site)
First Name: William
Last Name: Bradley
Birth Month: March
Birth Year: 1902
Zip: 48207

Both did request a ballot so that is a problem. The one ballot listed as returned is on the father's account that may now be challenged.

Now after all that, a fun little story from my research that may also explain the additional confusion with June Aiken.

Based on obituaries, it appears that there were two brothers, Harry and Floyd who both lived in the same zip code in Michigan. They both married women named June. Harry married June Pauline and Floyd married June Ann. June Ann Aiken seems to be the last survivor of the 4, in her 90s, and still appears to be voting.

Harry Aiken passed away in 2012 and does not appear on the voter rolls:
https://obits.mlive.com/obituaries/jackson/obituary.aspx?n=harry-p-aiken&pid=158896026

Floyd Aiken passed away in 2015 and is no longer on the voter rolls:
https://obits.mlive.com/obituaries/annarbor/obituary.aspx?n=floyd-junior-aiken&pid=174429043&fhid=21030

https://voterrecords.com/voter/20496897/floyd-aiken

June Pauline Aiken passed away in 2019 and is no longer on the voter rolls:
https://obits.mlive.com/obituaries/jackson/obituary.aspx?n=june-pauline-aiken&pid=191540711&fhid=16571

https://voterrecords.com/voter/25652270/june-aiken

June Ann Aiken appears to still be alive and is on the voter rolls:
https://voterrecords.com/voter/20496898/june-aiken

I definitely think this all needs to be investigated further but lets be careful.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
9
revere 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yeah, I'm a programmer and initially figured it wouldn't be too hard to run the Social Security Death Master File ( http://ssdmf.info/ ) against the ballot request systems. But I couldn't find any of these names in the SSDMF database. (It looks like William T Bradley is dead but isn't in the SSDMF database but I did find his obituary - I found the background on Bradley here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/seven-voters-older-oldest-human-alive-today-voted-michigan-including-one-man-born-1850/ ).

As I started digging more, I first thought June P. and June A. were the same person since they were in the same zip code (I assumed the "A" in June A. Aiken was an accidental double up of her last name) but it bothered me that it looked like they were 4 years difference in age on some records. I started digging into property records and it finally all clicked that there were brothers who both married women named June.

1
DonJr2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think data mining is great.

But the less tech savvy should simply try looking up people they personally know who died in recent years. That liberal acquaintance from high school, whose dad died two years ago... check if that dad "voted".

3
friend0rags 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also any that were sent, returned and accepted, we dont know who cast these. It could be someone from either side collecting additional votes.

Records will show where the ballot was sent so its an easy thing to narrow down.

The core point is any suspected fraud is investigated and done so openly so nothing can be buried in the follow-up.

2
CMUBigGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should be its own post. Good work!

12
BidenCrimeFamily 12 points ago +12 / -0

VOTER ID

2
stormcloud 2 points ago +2 / -0

No more taking in late ballots. I find that one really hypocritical: for how many years now have most of my family not had their votes counted because the military ballots came in way too late to be counted? Oh, a lot! Now all of a sudden late arriving ballots are oh, so important?

10
Kek_Johnson 10 points ago +10 / -0

Vote of the living dead.

10
CynicalRightwingB1tc 10 points ago +10 / -0

We just watched an election get stolen right in front of our fucking eyes. Absolutely fuck the democratic party.

10
SirDonaldJTrump 10 points ago +10 / -0

CAnt wait for twitter to tell us this is fake, although she died her SOUL can vote as per Michigan laws

9
igor 9 points ago +10 / -1

It was her dying wish...

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
2
Pedeville 2 points ago +2 / -0

crack not meth

i rate this snopes/0

7
Herr_Meerkatze 7 points ago +7 / -0

Key way to frauds is not to search for dead people. It is to vote for actual person who has not registered for voting.

Such voters are not visible for validation from outside, they are not aware their vote has been used. They will never go and check if they have voted or not.

States have info on all citizens. They have list of registered voters. Hence they have lists of unregistered voters with a right to vote. Fraudsters register the unregistered voters and mail-in their ballots.

The way it can be found is:

  • campaign among all citizens that have not voted to check if they have actually voted

If this is the case and such people will find themselves among those who have voted then THERE is the fraud.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0 (edited)
6
trumpforeverandever 6 points ago +6 / -0

GET THIS TO TRUMP. I TAGGED HIM AND HIS GUYS IN THE REPLIES BUT I DON'T KNOW IF IT'LL BE ENOUGH. EVERYBODY TAG THEM!!!!

6
donaldreagan 6 points ago +6 / -0

These most likely just the outliers and part of a big identity theft. All these mail/absentee votes should be verified, pretty fishy.

5
SoldierofKek 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good work discovering it. I was listening to Robert Barnes talk about this and the first thing we need is evidence to support wide spread fraud. In my opinion, though it's not worth much, there's absolutely no way to salvage the election in these battleground states where the fraud is taking place...no way in hell. The only way to handle this fairly is to order a new election...it's never been done for a presidential election, but guess what? The Dems have demanded and got a new election for less evidence.

5
GeorgeKirby 5 points ago +5 / -0

Where is he getting the names? I would like to help search. I feel like I’m sitting with a thumb up my ass not doing shit. Commiefornia is lost but i fucking search and compile shit all day if need be.

3
Stellariagazer 3 points ago +3 / -0

There still many of us trap in CA! Remember CA has a large population so the amount of Republicans or just independent who vote for Trump like myself is very huge. Enough to start multiple states.

2
UndocumentedUpvote 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can get a list of likely voters, they can get a list of unlikely voters. Probably from big data companies.

5
Cubanpede 5 points ago +5 / -0

They were probably friends with Joe when they were still alive

4
RevDrEBuzzMiller 4 points ago +4 / -0

I mean, we know the Democrats have always engaged in vote fraud. What they hell do we think happens in Detroit.

The have corpses on the voter rolls, and now they've run a corpse for President.

Where the fuck is Bush's lawyer Phil Beck. DJT should have him on speed dial and sic him on that fat cunt Big Gretch.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
LabashSe 4 points ago +5 / -1

We need something bigger than “3” people if we’re gonna want to convince people

5
orange_dit 5 points ago +5 / -0

True. But I think the point of this is that if laymen can easily find 3 examples, what the hell have government bureaucrats, that are supposed to update voter rolls, been doing for all these years?!

1
Pedeville 1 point ago +1 / -0

marking ballots for biden

3
Anonyyy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would say at this point what needs to happen is we must toss all mail-in ballots. There is no security protecting them from fraud. We must hold another election day but everyone must vote in person and with ID.

3
QueMalaHarris 3 points ago +3 / -0

The fuckers thought they were gonna get away with it too

3
lizardo221 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is there any way for people to help remotely with things like this? I'd stare at ballots for a few hours and find all the zombies.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
Aries_cz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here is a list of all supercentenarians, both living and dead

http://supercentenarian-research-foundation.org/TableE.aspx

Three guesses if either one of those people are on the list

1
RexCollumSilvarum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently in Michigan more supercentenarians than have existed in all of recorded history voted for Joe.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
HazelHen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look at it this way, each vote is a felony. Each vote is an act of treason.

Once caught, there must be a fair trial and if found guilty execution.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
dadmda123 2 points ago +3 / -1

What, you don’t care about dead people’s right to vote? Are you some sort of bigot?

1
SurrenderFreeman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Against zombie.....

With extreme bigotry

1
SlumberBalu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lefties and the democrats are so big jokes, that they make memes become reality!

1
Bill07 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where can we get the names and addreses to do this? How do we find that data?

1
Bornonthe1stofJuly 1 point ago +1 / -0

God must be part of the Deep State, if everybody becomes a Democrat voter after they die.

1
Pedeville 1 point ago +1 / -0

more dead people voting democrat than people eligible for heaven

must be satans doing

1
SmokeDopeDank 1 point ago +1 / -0

Time to subpoena that database.

1
lanre 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Sand313man 1 point ago +1 / -0

Should this not have the most severe of sentences?

I would argue grounds to lose citizenship - trying to defraud the democracy - should be met with no tolerance.

Can they trace who handed this ballot?

I mean I know technically the person is dead.. But is there no way to know who handed it in?

1
eagleboy 1 point ago +2 / -1

Great job ! Keep it going, we are a big part of this fight and helping trump win faster !

1
unspecified_user 1 point ago +1 / -0

And who did these long dead people vote for, pray tell?

1
Flipbarryfromreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

We knew they would do this too!!!!!! Nothing to see here folks, move along

1
knnbccb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any dead people voted GOP?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
UndocumentedUpvote 1 point ago +1 / -0

They would be screaming at the top of their lungs if GOP benefits.

1
Ponchik 1 point ago +1 / -0

How are they finding these? Can I help?

1
dagoat4l 1 point ago +1 / -0

They have figured out how to cheat. It stops now or they will never lose an election. These are scary times.

1
DeplorableOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

WTF Patriots will need to stand up and fight, do not rely on Government. WWG1WGA

1
snekipede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Find out their last known address and someone local get there now. If there's trash out on the curb, take it. Take pictures of anyone who comes and goes. If this was more coordinated than just mailing in dead grandma's ballot, we need this person to talk. Don't do anything illegal, or anything that would compromise an investigation, but get the info before they can destroy it or plan further.