4465
Comments (3665)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
52
FrankieDs 52 points ago +52 / -0

The math for the Wisconsin turnout is just not statistically possible.

27
Bearing51 27 points ago +27 / -0

Correct. WI and MI are the easiest cases to win because the fraud is so blatant and obvious.

10
ramennov 10 points ago +11 / -1

Please lay it out.

9
DelrayFitness 9 points ago +9 / -0

At least 7 districts in WI have >100% turnouts. How can any non-kangaroo court uphold that?

2
ramennov 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting.

1
Greenetarpaulin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because you can register to vote on Election Day in Wisconsin. It only matters if number of voters is greater than number of eligible voters, not registered voters.

3
DelrayFitness 3 points ago +3 / -0

Still, not every registered voter shows up to vote AND people move/die and get taken off the roles.

You want me to believe 90%+ turnout with new registrations? I don’t buy it.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
0
ramennov 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's still possible, though. Not saying it's not fraud, because we know it is, but that's not impossible.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
Slowsuby 5 points ago +5 / -0

Voter turnout was 89% in WI. That's 5 standard deviations above the mean. To put it bluntly, that never happens.

1
chaletschuss3467 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. At least it's easier to prove in courts