sorry, oldest post said 60 days, then I realized I don't know what the hell I'm looking at, just pissed at the fraud and taking it on people I shouldn't. Send in the lawyers, looking like 2000 all over again, with a side of openly cheating this time. Blood pressure's up, just had my 60th, and now I've got to wait for my President to be declared the winner. If I were still 19, I'd get drunk for a week. But I'm not, and I don't care to drink that much...but it's pretty tempting.
Is this some kind of disinformation campaign or something? This watermarked thing has been showing up frequently. Or is it just a larper getting his/her's/xir's rocks off?
Yes, it's disinformation. It was possibly intended as hopium, but it's real effect is complacency ("Oh, phew, DHS has this, I can sit back and let them take care of it...")
NO! Get involved - figure out some way to do your part, whatever it may be, to support the effort to fight the fraud / fight the steal!
As an enforcement tool - for a National Election - and in places like Detroit and Philly and Milwaukee and Cleveland and Houston and perhaps Miami which are all hives of election incompetence and fraud.... and carry 100s of Thousands of Votes...
I would like to see multiple precincts tested by 'out of state' Agencies -
to verify:
the Ballot Chain of Custody...
and to 100% vet the Voter as a 'real person'
who is fully credentialed and registered as a legal voter,
who actually will verify they did indeed 'cast a ballot' post election.
Recall the Recount in Michigan, in 2016... recall what happened there? Detroit Precincts had failed basic audit procedures; ballots versus voters, machine counts versus ballots given out... etc..
so in the end 'by LAW' were not allowed to be recounted... a totally failure.
My faith in elections and in the process is no where near where it should be.
INSTEAD OF VOTE VERIFICATION PROCESSES... we get entities like this = Center for Tech and Civic Life. Which basically send millions of dollars in grant money to DEM ONLY districts for "voting issues".... they are doing the exact opposite of verification.. they are opening pathways to massive fraud.
14th amendment put congress in charge of protecting pur voting rights. States have to prove they are legit, and congress can step in whenever they like.
Sorry, fake. No byline. Some serious grammar problems and its not using the AP style sheet. AP would never allow a reporter to say "In a stunning turn of events".
Agree 99% it's most likely fake. My only thought with the printing of ballots as most of you have pointed out could differ by state. For instance, some states/counties print their own or contract out, but others could rely on the federal government because they are lazy or don't want to pay for it. Just a thought. Im not well versed on election stuff, just on how to vote MAGA
Ballots, like money, are printed on special fraud-resistant paper, with particular size, thickness, weight, texture, color, and formats made to exact specifications. Furthermore, the paper is impressed with unique identifiers, such as watermarks, that certify it as an official ballot.
Bong! Watermarks confirmed, but this story still is not. If you go to DHS, go to the election security and check the PDF, you will see watermarks. But does not mean this story is true. Here is the link, go to the bottom and click mail in voting elections safeguard, read the last part of it, the green box at the bottom. https://www.cisa.gov/publication/election-infographic-products
Speaking of fake. 6 whole months here huh!
sorry, oldest post said 60 days, then I realized I don't know what the hell I'm looking at, just pissed at the fraud and taking it on people I shouldn't. Send in the lawyers, looking like 2000 all over again, with a side of openly cheating this time. Blood pressure's up, just had my 60th, and now I've got to wait for my President to be declared the winner. If I were still 19, I'd get drunk for a week. But I'm not, and I don't care to drink that much...but it's pretty tempting.
Is this some kind of disinformation campaign or something? This watermarked thing has been showing up frequently. Or is it just a larper getting his/her's/xir's rocks off?
Yes, it's disinformation. It was possibly intended as hopium, but it's real effect is complacency ("Oh, phew, DHS has this, I can sit back and let them take care of it...")
NO! Get involved - figure out some way to do your part, whatever it may be, to support the effort to fight the fraud / fight the steal!
Grifters
Would be nice
As an enforcement tool - for a National Election - and in places like Detroit and Philly and Milwaukee and Cleveland and Houston and perhaps Miami which are all hives of election incompetence and fraud.... and carry 100s of Thousands of Votes...
I would like to see multiple precincts tested by 'out of state' Agencies - to verify:
the Ballot Chain of Custody...
and to 100% vet the Voter as a 'real person'
who is fully credentialed and registered as a legal voter,
who actually will verify they did indeed 'cast a ballot' post election.
Recall the Recount in Michigan, in 2016... recall what happened there? Detroit Precincts had failed basic audit procedures; ballots versus voters, machine counts versus ballots given out... etc.. so in the end 'by LAW' were not allowed to be recounted... a totally failure.
My faith in elections and in the process is no where near where it should be.
INSTEAD OF VOTE VERIFICATION PROCESSES... we get entities like this = Center for Tech and Civic Life. Which basically send millions of dollars in grant money to DEM ONLY districts for "voting issues".... they are doing the exact opposite of verification.. they are opening pathways to massive fraud.
14th amendment put congress in charge of protecting pur voting rights. States have to prove they are legit, and congress can step in whenever they like.
bro i hope it's true, I also saw this video of someone possibly confirming the watermarks:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSGiepYfMy0&
confirmation bias, maybe, but it seems to be gaining steam
When you want to believe something is when you should be most skeptical.
When I see it here I'm in.
I'm hoping it's real... right now probably not
https://www.dhs.gov/
Source link or bogus.
Sauce plz
source:
http://treeofliberty.me/2020/11/05/mainstream-is-censoring-this-ap-onewire-press-release-about-obvious-election-fraud-so-i-am-leaking-it/
So no video of him scrolling the site
This is fake
Where’s the link to the DHS website making this announcement?
There isn’t one
That’s because this is fake
Not saying it's real probably under 16 percent, but if it was a Sting Operation would it be public?
Sorry, fake. No byline. Some serious grammar problems and its not using the AP style sheet. AP would never allow a reporter to say "In a stunning turn of events".
Fake, fake.
who published this?
The chans
source:
http://treeofliberty.me/2020/11/05/mainstream-is-censoring-this-ap-onewire-press-release-about-obvious-election-fraud-so-i-am-leaking-it/
Agree 99% it's most likely fake. My only thought with the printing of ballots as most of you have pointed out could differ by state. For instance, some states/counties print their own or contract out, but others could rely on the federal government because they are lazy or don't want to pay for it. Just a thought. Im not well versed on election stuff, just on how to vote MAGA
The sauce for this was a fucking link to treeofliberty.me the site had a link to boogaloo merch on it rollseyes
SAGE
danger- this is probably disinfo. There is no link to the dhs press release.
This is poorly written and consequently, not credible. Where is it supposed to be from? I hate it when pedes post stuff like this with no source info.
Get this fake shit tf outta here
Boogaloo site? Lol Comeon man!
Ballots, like money, are printed on special fraud-resistant paper, with particular size, thickness, weight, texture, color, and formats made to exact specifications. Furthermore, the paper is impressed with unique identifiers, such as watermarks, that certify it as an official ballot.
https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/news/10346-ballots-are-secure-knowledge-on-vote-by-mail-is
What happens when the same election officials who print the legitimate ballots decide they want to print some extra ballots, just in case?
Wow, someone typed this up on a word processor, so it must be real.
Good
Clearly a bogus article/announcement. Throw it in the bin with the fraud ballots.
80% fake. Give me a break.
I can’t find anything about this online. Can anyone verify?
Gonna need a link to the actual DHS saying they are conducting an election fraud sting.
source?
source:
http://treeofliberty.me/2020/11/05/mainstream-is-censoring-this-ap-onewire-press-release-about-obvious-election-fraud-so-i-am-leaking-it/
Hmmm
Bong! Watermarks confirmed, but this story still is not. If you go to DHS, go to the election security and check the PDF, you will see watermarks. But does not mean this story is true. Here is the link, go to the bottom and click mail in voting elections safeguard, read the last part of it, the green box at the bottom. https://www.cisa.gov/publication/election-infographic-products
Fake
Hope porn
Funny, the5y seemed to have forgotten to post this on their website. https://www.dhs.gov/news
TRUST BUT VERIFY. Especially before you post fake news.
Um. . . no.
Please stop with this.
This is a wet dream of fake news.
Why does this LARP keep cropping up?
T_D and .WIN have been bamboozled by hope porn for years.
This will need to be won in the courts. No magic fairy is getting us out of this one.
This would be amazing, but don't know if it's true, even from the link.
I feel like I'm praying towards Mecca saying a prayer so many times a day
can't find this headline in any search engine, it only exists as an image
source:
http://treeofliberty.me/2020/11/05/mainstream-is-censoring-this-ap-onewire-press-release-about-obvious-election-fraud-so-i-am-leaking-it/
Although I wish this was true - dont believe everything you read from every random website.