1374
Comments (26)
sorted by:
22
OGTD1 22 points ago +22 / -0

This makes total sense because of holding the senate and picking up seats in the house. It was nationwide or at least only in swing states. No one fills out just the presidency.

1
spez3 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve seen democrat shills say “perhaps they were happy with their senator but hated their president”...

OK - then you vote for the guy who is “making you happy” otherwise you risk him getting replaced....

Robert Barnes said the fraudulent Biden camp often only fill in the presidential candidate when they stuff the ballot so that senators and other politicians on the ballot “don’t have legal standing” to raise objections.

17
DrCowboyPresident 17 points ago +17 / -0

If you were having to mark a few thousand votes, you wouldn't want to fill the whole thing out either

10
TedCruzAteABoogaloo 10 points ago +10 / -0

They have deadlines to meet!

15
sordfysh 15 points ago +15 / -0

This would be so dang sloppy. But we already know they aren't sending their best. They are sending pawns who think they are ready to go to prison for the party. But they will probably talk or end up with a bad case of Clinton-itis.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
Carbum 6 points ago +6 / -0

Its sloppy because polls were fake and Trump crushed his expectations

1
Bramble 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately it doesn't matter, because it's a legal ballot if you only fill in POTUS. Never mind that it's INCREDIBLY UNLIKELY, if the ballots themselves cannot be determined to be fake, then even a recount can't remove them.

It's fucking dirty as hell, but I don't know what can be done. The only way to prevent this is to prevent mail in ballots.

7
ohwens 7 points ago +7 / -0

They didn't have time to mark down-ballot if they had to create 100k + ballots in a few hours.

2
sorrytodisagree 2 points ago +2 / -0

This.

6
Crisis83 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes and you can see this in Georgia too. CANDIDATE VOTES PCT% Donald J. Trump * 2,436,327 49.52% Joe Biden 2,423,107 49.25% Jo Jorgensen 60,628 1.23%

CANDIDATE VOTES PCT% David Perdue * 2,437,300 49.98% Jon Ossoff 2,326,427 47.71% Shane Hazel 112,673 2.31%

No way Joe's voters are not voting for Jon since the Dems need/want Senate control. Almost as if Joe ballots were hasty added in the mix.

5
Redpill-notCommieRed 5 points ago +5 / -0

Look into NE district 2 as well. Trump lost 1 electoral vote there but the Republican House seat won his race.

2
ImReallyRich 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea it’s ridiculous. If anything, more people would vote for trump over a GOP house seat

4
SwanS0ng 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was going to say somehow we know the NC gov won his race by 300k but we won't know the states choice for Prez until next week? Did those 300k people just not vote for any other office?

2
richmomz 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not just in WI - this is happening in a lot of other states as well and it's the reason why the GOP is performing better in House and Senate races than anticipated. As an anecdote, on election day I was watching the early returns for Texas where it was initially favoring Biden by a few percentage points, but the GOP candidate for the Senate race (John Cornyn) was already beating his democrat opponent by a healthy margin. It's possible that there were just a bunch of lazy democrats who couldn't be bothered to fill out the whole ballot (I don't think Texas allows party-line votes anymore, or at least my county doesn't) but it's also possible that it was some half-assed attempt at fraud.

In a state like Texas it wouldn't make much difference but in battleground states, it absolutely would.

2
tragician 2 points ago +2 / -0

No independent votes. No other counts won't senators. Clear fraud if they didn't vote for house and senate as well.

2
Zude 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, statistical likelihood would show that this is practically impossible. That's a piece of evidence right there, and gives you areas to target your investigation. So, yes this is extremely relevant.

2
abiisthebestwifeever 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are just dumb. They thought mixing 170000 votes with the larger number that it wouldn't be identifiable and they were doing it at 4AM so no one would see. They didn't count on the live updates to vote counts.

1
Redpill-notCommieRed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dems are lazy by default. Toss all of those votes.

1
Dtom13 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're getting sloppy. Why not just go all in?

Or maybe it's possible that some people wanted a divided government and voted accordingly. I've spoken to people who hate Trump but generally lean Republican otherwise.

1
Demonspawn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or maybe it's possible that some people wanted a divided government and voted accordingly. I've spoken to people who hate Trump but generally lean Republican otherwise.

Then that 100k votes that dem house candidates didn't get would have gone to rep house candidates. Instead, they're just not voting for any house candidate, which is fishy as fuck.

0
Dtom13 0 points ago +1 / -1

True. I'd like to see some more in-depth analysis to see if this has ever actually happened before, in other elections. It's definitely odd but I wouldn't say it's definitive proof of fraud (just good evidence of something strange going on).

1
PapaPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are at least that many if not more fake ones that did full down ticket

1
Captain_MAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same thing happened in North Carolina, and yet Dan Forest conceded as fast as he could like a little bitch.

1
TheUpsetter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does anyone have this information in a spreadsheet? Could plot the delta in votes for all the states and show the statistical likelihood of this happening

1
Solocouple 1 point ago +1 / -0

On my ballot in TN, after presenting my drivers license, the last two were demos with no reps runner so left them blank.