3677
Comments (102)
sorted by:
189
hodlmybeer 189 points ago +189 / -0

Not enough time to fill in whole fake ballots.

124
Filetsmignon 124 points ago +124 / -0

Also explains the ~100K vote dump for Biden in the middle of the night. The Democrat overlords must be pissed that their minion dumped them all at once (they were supposed to slowly feed them in throughout the night) - which provided us with evidence.

88
deleted 88 points ago +88 / -0
36
deleted 36 points ago +36 / -0
27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
31
jslenterprises 31 points ago +31 / -0

There's 2 things that about democrats are true. 1) they're lazy, some just have a lot more money. 2) They cheat their way through life in some form or fasion.

12
HockeyMom4Trump 12 points ago +12 / -0

And there is a 3rd...always miserable

4
somedaysoon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah when you launder money/votes you're supposed to do a little here and a little there. C'mon man!

2
FuckRioters 2 points ago +2 / -0

138k

24
Toohershat 24 points ago +24 / -0

Also, not sure how much this matters, but the other Republicans on these WI ballots can't challenge it. For example, the Republican state senate candidate can't challenge these bullshit ballots because the "voter" did not vote for that office. So now the headlines will say it's just Trump acting all crazy challenging it in court.

There was no US Senate race there. In Michigan it makes complete sense to make a fraudulent ballot with both Biden and Peters votes. 1) it gets each candidate elected, and 2) it would be odd if Trump lost but James won the senate race by 1M votes.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
79
deleted 79 points ago +79 / -0
35
SanFranShitty 35 points ago +35 / -0

Also easy to throw out 🙏🏼

-5
Bramble -5 points ago +4 / -9

How? Its perfectly legal to only vote for president. If the ballots are there, and were "legally cast", then they won't be removed.

The only hope is if they are obviously fake or simply non existent.

17
SanFranShitty 17 points ago +17 / -0

Could see an occasional voter only voting for President but this many people is another point on the long growing list of statistical anomalies present in these “results”.

Do you honestly believe hundreds of thousands of people took the time to only vote for President and decided not to weigh in on any other issues? Unlikely!

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
8
KingNova 8 points ago +8 / -0

it is not this statistically prevalent. it’s like 1 out of 100K that don’t vote down ballot. and there are 200K with no down ballot votes in PA. but no other evidence of this happening anywhere else in the country. only important swing states, it seems unlikely to be a coincidence.

3
DisgustedByMisleadia 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not sure how convincing it is.

I see the same phenomena in Texas:

https://results.texas-election.com/races

  • Trump: 5,858,334, Biden: 5,209,021, Total: 11,227,604

  • Cornyn: 5,929,724, Hegar: 4,842,272, Total: 11,062,051

  • 165,553 more votes for President than for Senator.

  • 366,748 more votes for Biden than for Hegar

  • 71,390 more votes for Cornyn than for Trump.

But, we have to look a bit further down the ballot.

  • 160,248 votes for third-party Presidential candidates
  • 290,055 votes for third-party Senate candidates

I'm not sure how the votes would distribute, but I'll start with:

  1. 72,390 people voted for Cornyn, but not Trump. Assuming they all voted for BIden, that would explain those additional votes over Hegar. So, the unexplained differential is now 295,359.

  2. 129,806 people voted third-party for Senator, but not for President. I don't know if those people would have voted for Trump or Biden. If we assume a 50-50 split, the unexplained differential is now 230,456.

But keep in mind this is a much smaller percentage of Texas voters. 11.2M people voted in Texas, vs. 3.2M in Wisconsin.

Spez, one possible explanation: Texas eliminated straight-ticket voting starting this election. In the past, there reportedly was a higher number of straight-ticket Democrat voters than Republicans in Texas. That might be the reason why there aren't as many down-ticket votes for Democrats.

Perhaps that's a contributing factor in Wisconsin, who also doesn't have straight-ticket voting.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
DisgustedByMisleadia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democrats tried to block the removal of straight-ticket voting in Texas, because they thought it would make it too hard for Democrats to vote for the entire ticket. They used weasel words, but that's essentially what they were afraid of.

I understand what you want to do. But, since Texas just now eliminated straight-ticket voting, maybe you could look back at 2016 and see what happened then, for comparison.

56
deleted 56 points ago +56 / -0
55
blacktankguy 55 points ago +55 / -0

I heard that fraudulently filled out ballots often only pick one race (in this case, only pick biden, and none of the other senate or local races).

They do not want to statistically make any other races "close" because that will draw more scrutiny or potential to open up law suits for the courts to discover the fraud.

Not sure if that is true....who knows what is true anymore.

45
DrCowboyPresident 45 points ago +45 / -0

I think the answer is much simpler than that, if it's paper ballots we're talking about.

Imagine you're a faithful Dem commie. You are one of the ones filling out the ballots.

Here's your 1000 ballots to mark. How inclined are you going to be to fill the whole thing out?

14
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 14 points ago +15 / -1

But straight ticket voting exists. I think the less scrutiny thing makes more sense.

Edit: not correct in WI, I looked it up. No straight ticket. TY replies that pointed it out for their state.

16
Spooky_Lunch 16 points ago +16 / -0

Idk about WI but here in NH we didn't have straight ticket. I had to fill out the whole thing.

10
Hairy_Mouse 10 points ago +10 / -0

Same in PA. I asked how to do it and they just said you can't this year. I had to click on every Republican individually, by they were clearly marked and always in the same spot.

5
Factsnlogic 5 points ago +5 / -0

NY too

4
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 4 points ago +4 / -0

Looked it up - looks like you're correct. They don't have it in WI.

2
NC_patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same in NC

7
vicentezo04 7 points ago +7 / -0

This isn't straight ticket voting. Its circling the bubble for Biden but not for any of the other D candidates or D endorsed props.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
vicentezo04 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm in CA and not aware of this "straight ticket" bubble. Is there one in WI?

4
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 4 points ago +4 / -0

Turns out there is not, I looked it up and edited my comment.

4
ConfiscateTheCoats 4 points ago +4 / -0

We don’t have that in VA. Not sure how it is state by state.

3
DisgustedByMisleadia 3 points ago +3 / -0

Texas got rid of straight-ticket voting in this election cycle. Per this article:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/texas-eliminates-straight-ticket-voting-option/ar-BB18mS0O

Straight-ticket voting remains in six states. I don't know which ones.

5
behemoth887 5 points ago +5 / -0

also if they steal from multiple candidates they face multiple lawsuits and also piss off the GOP, while if they steal from just Trump, the GOP doesn't care

43
deleted 43 points ago +43 / -0
24
deleted 24 points ago +25 / -1
21
kebabdrogo 21 points ago +22 / -1

Wait. For now

18
NoahGav 18 points ago +18 / -0

It's being contested in the courts by Trump.

14
vicentezo04 14 points ago +14 / -0

Trump campaign can challenge legally. WI legislature (if Republican) can refuse to send electors for Biden.

Lots of routes. For now, just get the word out.

4
Markdin7725 4 points ago +4 / -0

What do you mean refuse to send electors?

4
ConfiscateTheCoats 4 points ago +4 / -0

It means we choose the right electors, regardless of their fraud.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
10
ConfiscateTheCoats 10 points ago +10 / -0

I mean, if the alternative is allowing them to win via fraud, then so be it. Not desirable but we have to make a stand on this.

1
amopheldupsidedown 1 point ago +1 / -0

Riots can be quelled, we just have to

RELEASE THE KYLE

7
TearofLys 7 points ago +7 / -0

Gather as much evidence as we can of fraud, create a report, and disseminate it to people that can use it (e.g. campaign, media, legal team)

5
barefootozark 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly. Once the ballots are mixed in with others can they be tracked to someone or not? How do you proof the ballott was fraudulently filled out?

23
OutcastSeal 23 points ago +23 / -0

These Antifa fucks have infiltrated every level of every institution. Nobody fills in one bubble and leaves the rest of the 6 pages blank.

10
TearofLys 10 points ago +10 / -0

This isn't Antifa. They are street thugs for the left and nothing more. This was perpetrated by operatives. What we need to do is get election integrity laws passed that only allows absentee voting in special circumstances.

5
Factsnlogic 5 points ago +5 / -0

These are all the Obama ACORN people that Andrew Brietbart exposed coming back for more

2
chopz 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's exactly what BLM/Antifa are. Street thugs for the left.

19
Filetsmignon 19 points ago +19 / -0

I've been watching closely what's going on the past 36 hours and I've seen a lot of suggested proof and anecdotal evidence of fraud. But if this is true, that there's a ~100K gap between house Dem votes and Biden votes in Wisconsin, than it's the hardest evidence for fraud I've seen yet and I will be 100% convinced of it. That's a smoking gun!

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
10
The_RedWolf 10 points ago +10 / -0

Draw your own conclusions, I took the time and did the math.

WISCONSIN

==========================================

2020 Dem+Rep Results (as reported at 11/5/20 2:25pm CST)

Presidential Votes: 3,240,536

House Votes: 3,146,271

Difference: 94,265 (2.91%)

=============

2020 All Party Results (as reported at 11/5/20 2:25pm CST)

Presidential Votes: 3,297,420

House Votes: 3,154,457

Difference: 142,963 (4.34%)

==========================================

2016 Dem+Rep Results

Presidential Votes: 2,787,820

House Votes: 2,650,446

Difference: 137,374 (4.92%)

=============

2016 All Party Results

Presidential Votes: 2,976,150

House Votes: 2,773,662

Difference: 202,488 (6.80%)

==========================================

2012 Dem+Rep Results

Presidential Votes: 3,028,951

House Votes: 2,847,010

Difference: 181,941 (6.01%)

=============

2012 All Party Results

Presidential Votes: 3,068,434

House Votes: 2,956,050

Difference: 72,901 (3.66%)

==========================================

2008 Dem+Rep Results

Presidential Votes: 2,929,604

House Votes: 2,658,523

Difference: 271,081 (9.25%)

=============

2008 All Party Results

Presidential Votes: 2,983,417

House Votes: 2,775,174

Difference: 208,243 (6.98%)

==========================================

2004 Dem+Rep Results

Presidential Votes: 2,967,624

House Votes: 2,760,215

Difference: 207,409 (6.99%)

=============

2004 All Party Results

Presidential Votes: 2,994,021

House Votes: 2,832,064

Difference: 161,957 (5.41%)

5
The_RedWolf 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'd like to point out is that I find it interesting that while 2004-2012 has drops in "difference %" from dem+rep to all party, it had raises in 2016 and 2020.

9
spezisacuckold 9 points ago +9 / -0

This also helps prove fraud because most Democrats held their nose and voted for Biden, while they were much more enthusiastic about supporting Democrats that aren't Biden (e.g. the down-ballot candidates).

If anything, Biden's vote should be expected to be a bit lower than the down-ballot Democrat candidates -- just like Trump's.

7
Ben45 7 points ago +7 / -0

Trump won

6
TheEmoEngineer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Can someone please get me some sauce on this?

Like is there a news article, video, or pictures that I can throw at the normies? They won't believe this tweet by itself.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
PizzaDecorations 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's a big concern for me. I can bookmark this page, but there is no guarantee that the tweet will still be available.

1
TheEmoEngineer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can glean info just fine from these but normies aren't going to take tweets at face value when I show them, which becomes a problem

3
barefootozark 3 points ago +3 / -0

I added all rep votes for the 8 districts and and was off by less than 10 on each side compared to the post above.

Still need to consider write ins and 3rd party... I only found 7911 of those. That isn't 105,000.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/results-wisconsin-house-district-8.html

6
CmonPeopleGetReal 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wait, and also 10k voted downballot for GOP but not for Trump? Yeah fucking right.

6
SanFranShitty 6 points ago +6 / -0

There’s your voter fraud. Mr. Ferrari and his friends were in a hurry to fill in ballots and didn't have time to fill in the down vote

3
Alpha_plus 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Lemme commit voter fraud in the least inconspicuous car imaginable" lol

They're not sending their best folks.

6
barefootozark 6 points ago +6 / -0

Are we to believe that 93.58% of Biden voters filled in one vote and passed it in, and 100.65% of GOP voted for more that the president?

Not only are there 104,699 more votes for Biden than Dem House members, but the GOP side is almost as odd. Seriously, there are 10,434 more votes for GOP than Trump votes. How do they explain this. Did 10434 Biden voters vote for GOP House members? I doubt that also.

5
Trumpticusprime 5 points ago +5 / -0

democrats can't even rig an election... what business have they got running a country.

5
LastHearth 5 points ago +5 / -0

I just did some quick numbers.

In 2016: Trump got 1,405,284 votes, Republican Senator got 1,479,471 (105%)votes and Republican Congressional Candidates got 1,270,448. The discrepancy is because in District 4 there were no Republican candidate running, so the probably many Republicans in that district that skipped and some voted for independents.

Hillary got 1,382,536 votes, Democrat Senator got 1,380,335 votes (99.8%), and Democrat Congressional Candidates got 1,379,996 (99.8%).

There is no reason my Dem house candidates would get 93.6% of the vote of a presidential candidate when historically they would track so closely.

4
GT24 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is BIG! They were rushing!!!! FRAUD!!!

4
85Dacudo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wait so these ballots were marked for Biden....and no one else running ?

3
DaayTerkErJerbs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bet those were the 100k+ Absentee ballots they found in the middle of the night to flip Wisconsin where 100% of found ballots went to Biden

3
swimminginthoughts 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have never, ever not voted down the ballot.

3
amopheldupsidedown 3 points ago +3 / -0

In Ca, when they give you Harris and another dem for senator, you don't bother with that line. But I still had to vote no on all props back then.

2
Factsnlogic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this overall or are all 100k from these magic ballots that just appeared?

1
amopheldupsidedown 1 point ago +1 / -0

What, you want transparency now? Unverifiability is a cornerstone of our democracy. /s

2
MFB1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is called democrat fraud in WI.

2
SyNiKaLiTy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I need the graph showing this plz.

2
NYC_Deplorable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Source? I saw similar for Virginia. Huge red pill.

2
AbsoluteJack1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Confiscate all of the ballots cast and re-count them immediately!

2
tiamat 2 points ago +2 / -0

A few hundred sure, 100thousand not doing it? Fraud

2
KudzuKing69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds reasonable.

NOT!!

2
djtverystablegenius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Archived Tweet can be found here:

https://archive.is/8NdXz

2
JediDwag 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do we have the stats that show what % of dem voters in that area did that in previous years? Because if we have a marked increase in "voter turnout" that just so happens to coincide with the increase of presidential race only ballots that would be pretty hard to explain away.

They're trying so hard to rig it, but statistics don't lie. Any one of these statistical anomalies happening is explainable, but all of them happening in the exact states required to barely squeak Biden to 270, and by a ridiculously slim margins. 🤔

2
DeplorableLA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hinky

2
mintscape 2 points ago +2 / -0

What complete horse shit.

2
MaxineWaters4Prez 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm also guessing many or most of Biden's votes were complete ballots all the way down. The LAST 100k were hurriedly rushed with only the Biden bubble filled in.

2
covfefe-time 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, I wonder why they don't want Poll Watchers inside the locations?

2
KRM944 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are quite a few “anomalies” of statistics that are huge indicators of fraud.

I have faith that the DJT Team has the best lawyers, statisticians, investigators and Americans.

We. Will. Win!

2
ajm144k 2 points ago +2 / -0

how do we prove people weren't just voting for Biden for President then R downticket?

2
grad16uc 2 points ago +2 / -0

These people are selling us beachfront property.

1
somedaysoon 1 point ago +1 / -0

God way to check is to compare the analysis against past elections, how many of those were mail in, how many of the caught fraudulent votes for this pattern etc. We need some people with access to the data and a lot of coffee to break this shit open.

1
SoldierOnFire 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Anomaly" Translation = FUCKING FRAUD!!!

1
dave12 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah much quicker to mark 100k false ballots with your 100 of your GOONS on just Biden than have to fill in 20 bubbles for all the down ballot races and ballot measures.

1
TheMemeSpiceMustFlow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Has anyone put together a spreadsheet of all the states for this data? If not I can. Give me an hour.

1
Philhelm 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honk!

1
Licensetomeme 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where's the source?

1
StaryHickory 1 point ago +1 / -0

A lot of it was avoiding challenges at other levels of the election. And maybe these are just people trying to defraud and fuck Trump which is what the left has been doing.

1
amopheldupsidedown 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well now we will have to give more time for the ballot counters to fill in some of those bubbles and fix the ballots