937
Comments (11)
sorted by:
12
Comanche_Moon 12 points ago +12 / -0

200%? Yeah, that's a problem.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
ItsOKtoVoteTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

maybe they award an extra vote to those over 300 pounds?

3
ChewyBass 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you identified as a woman last week they could early vote. Identify as a man and send in your mail in ballot. On election day identify as non-binary and vote.

10
HaitchElGee 10 points ago +10 / -0

And if you point this out to a Democrat, they won't give a single shit. They really are utterly amoral.

2
Plazma10 2 points ago +2 / -0

I got kicked off Twitter. Show them these charts that visualize the fraudulent distribution: https://thedonald.win/p/11PpFuP408/another-look-at-benfords-law-in-/

7
LockeThePatriot 7 points ago +7 / -0

The rebuttal I keep seeing about high voter counts in WI is that they allow election day registration. Does anyone know if there is data available on how many registered on election day?

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
LockeThePatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not saying it's believable. Just trying to acquire the proof needed to shut it down.

2
Plazma10 2 points ago +2 / -0

The distribution is still a statistical anomaly: please pass this chat to the Trump campaign if you Facebook or Twitter. https://thedonald.win/p/11PpFuP408/another-look-at-benfords-law-in-/

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0