While tantalizing, set aside the 4D chess stuff for a second.
There’s an inarguably damned good reason that these ballots have these marks - so that they can be quickly, accurately and irrefutably identified and confirmed, later.
And there’s a reason why they must also be verified via block chain - so that they cannot be forged and replicated. To insert this batch of ballots at one point would invalidate all that followed afterward.
And as several posts have said, both here and elsewhere, these ballots absolutely bear these marks. It’s publicly available info and well-proven.
So, if the Dems were stupid enough to print unofficial ballots (or printing them now) to make their fraud easier, then it’ll be a quick, easy and irrefutable process to verify that - again, because that’s what the marks are for.
Now, what I wonder is whether the system that all states use to scan in ballots to have then counted has also secretly been doing and reporting these validity checks the whole time, and storing / relaying that information, locally or elsewhere, and with the users (poll workers) being unaware.
I also wonder if the USPS system has done the same when the ballots were processed in, so as to allow the ballots to be tracked from received by USPS to delivered from polling place / counting center. I think that’s why Trump is talking about “bags of ballots” coming in “from everywhere” - because he knows that mail-in ballots should only arrive from a single source, the USPS, but are coming in from anywhere, instead, so as to stuff the box. How would Dems possibly explain that any percentage of “mail-in ballots” didn’t arrive in the mail? It would beg the question as to where they came from, and that would be difficult to answer if any fraud had occurred.
Obviously, voter fraud can still occur even while using valid ballots (dead people voting, ballot harvesting, etc.) - but this would be a very quick and easy way to identify ballots as fraudulent and have them quickly thrown out.
I truly think that they had a reserve of ballots - perhaps perfectly valid ones (albeit from dead people, etc.) - ready to go, and which they planned to slowly filter into the count throughout the night, but that Trump’s counts were so much higher than they expected, that they exhausted their supplies. That’s why they stopped counting, because it was only growing better for Trump and worse for them, and they were running out of time to make more. If you think those spikes in MI & WI look terrible now - and they do - imagine if the Dems waited to dumped them at the very end, and when the states were at 95%+. Even they knew they couldn’t explain that away. So they stopped counting, and began printing more.
This is why they were so ham-fisted in dumping them en masse, and couldn’t afford to give Trump a single one - because they couldn’t afford to do so in making up the shortfall while not exceeding the number of eligible voters / registrants. Damn the optics, as they’re already bad enough as they were, but you can’t defend breaking hard limits such as that.
So, if true, and the Dems have caught wind that they’ve been had with these hallmarks (how could they now know now?) - what’s their recourse? Well, they could throw up their hands and just admit the wrongdoing. That’s not happening. They could just let the ballots sit there, knowing that they’ll hang them - definitely proving their intentional fraud - and wait to be caught. Or, they could realize what’s happened and try to assess the extent of what fraud they’ll prove - again, definitively - and to quietly get rid of the evidence. Then what happens? Well, Trump wins, which he’s already done - but the racket then can’t be definitively proven, and no one goes to jail.
I believe that they’re going to try to convince everyone that Biden’s won, so as to make all of this moot in everyone’s minds - in fact, they’re lining this up in GA now. That’s also why Fox won’t put Arizona back in as a tossup. They’re going to stack those two frauds together and call it done, and they only need a second and a scintilla of seemingly credible evidence to do so.
If that doesn’t work, they’re going to destroy those ballots and just claim standard clerical errors when the recounts how hulking errors. Or better, they’ll claim that Trump “forced” them to “throw out” hundreds of thousands of ballots, and hence, further delegitimize his second term.
It ultimately doesn’t matter if Trump knew or intended it or not. It only matters that he, and those around him, learn and understand this NOW. That these hallmarks are available NOW, and will remain so forever, and that they use them to prove - IRREFUTABLY - what the Democrats and their globalist money friends have attempted to do here in this election, and to our nation. Americans can struggle to maintain enough attention on much of anything, but they’ll quickly grasp that watermarks, machine dots or block chains are either there and legit or not.
I want to believe that there is this giant sting going on, but I think that sounds like LARPing silliness. I’d love to think that this was all a plant to catch the Dems doing what they have done for years - lying and cheating the American people. But whether that’s the plan or not, is really immaterial, as these hallmarks / validity checks now offer that opportunity NOW. And he MUST use it.
TRUMP HAS TO ENSURE THAT THEY SCAN THESE BALLOTS FOR THOSE HALLMARKS AND MAKE THOSE FINDINGS KNOWN.
What am I missing?
The dots are "real", but they exist in digital printers like you'd find in a home or office. A printing press is a completely different animal. You wouldn't need anything special to tell a ballot made on a printing press from a ballot made on a printer. It would be obvious. You also couldn't print the actual ballot markings. They'd have to be filled in with ink pens or it would be painfully obvious to the naked eye even to someone who knows nothing about printing.
Furthermore, they can't print hundreds of thousands of new ballots and fill them out by pen in a few hours, but they had no need to. The number of extra blank ballots that are typically printed far dwarfs what they've so far pulled out of their rears. The same election supervisors and ballot workers that are currently counting fake votes, have had those blank ballots in their possession for several months now. They made as many fakes as they could with the plan of only dumping in a realistic amount, but they had to use too many to be believable.
Ballot integrity measures like special paper and secret watermarks are useless if the cheaters are the people in charge of the ballots. It's the same as having voter ID, but having poll workers that refuse to check IDs or turn people away for not having them. It's a solution to the wrong problem.
The watermark argument is like saying you can stop a bank employee from stealing real money with anti-counterfeiting measures.
I think they had ballots pre-printed, likely for months. I think Trump’s margins exceeded them, and they printed more.
This is why they all stopped counting - at the same time in both WI & MI.
This is why they all had a similar 100% infusion for Biden in both WI & MI.
Once printed, they had people hand complete the presidential vote - which is why they’re finding thousands of ballots who voted for Biden in places at an >85% clip, but didn’t vote for the Democratic Senate candidate, immediately below it.
If the ballots have these hallmarks - and they do - then they could be used to identify any fake ballots. Even if the ballots are legit, it DOESN’T mean that the vote is legal.
Do you see how it’s a two-step process? Is the ballot legit (hallmarks) and THEN is the vote legally cast / counted.
If these hallmarks served no purpose, they wouldn’t exist - and yet, THEY ABSOLUTELY EXIST.
If they can easily sneak in a box of fake ballots. How much more easily can they sneak OUT a box of legit blank ballots?
They needed the pause to move the ballots and fill out more, but not to print new ones. They would have to have contacted a 24/7 industrial printing press and put in an order for hundreds of thousands of ballots, printed, cut, and folded then filled them out and delivered them.
Why bother when there were boxes of unused ballots lying on the floor in the same room they were already counting?
I appreciate all of this.
I wonder if Trump’s lead was so vast - and growing - that he blew through their stockpile.
Or maybe they didn’t print them, but had to quickly fill out thousands more than they believed they needed, hence the pause in counting.
I’d love to believe it’s this elaborate sting, because it’d rip Dems out at the root...but I have no faith that it is.
I’m totally going on the fact that they had to have a reason to put those hallmarks on the ballots, and that it had to originate from a fear of a bunch of fake printed ballots....and which is what Trump has repeatedly warned about. I may not know what those reasons specifically are, but I’m certain that it wasn’t for nothing and no reason. I don’t have hallmarks on my notepad because I don’t fear anyone making a fake of it. If I had a hallmark on my notepad, there’d have to be a reason that I feared it’d be fake. That’s the best I can explain it, inadequate as it may be.