314
Comments (38)
sorted by:
5
shadypollster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hmm, this quickly leads here:

https://www.christianforums.com/threads/mainstream-is-censoring-dhs-2020-election-fraud-sting.8186094/

Where they have a screenshot of an article about a DHS sting BUT no link? Hmmm.

2
Polygauge [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know Econ Chicks background, she doesn't post things she doesn't believe have a high likelihood of truth behind them. She used to work with the Pentagon, as well.

Of course, I say alleged because it is understandable to be skeptical. I am looking for more info as we speak

2
HillarysMingy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did you read what she wrote? Its essentially only for press and if you don't have an account through your employer you cannot access that release. Now, that obviously doesn't make it true but she explains why there is no link.

4
shadypollster 4 points ago +4 / -0

I did read it yes. I do not buy this narrative and now believe it is a distraction. Besides if it is true I have to get a trump tattoo and there are too many choices.

2
HillarysMingy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm with you there. I do hold out a glimmer of hope solely due to the fact that Trump is always 2 steps ahead but who knows.

2
Fistfulofgreyhair 2 points ago +2 / -0

Need more sauce.

3
Polygauge [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Working on it

2
Fistfulofgreyhair 2 points ago +2 / -0

It would be huge if true. Game changer.

1
1
Polygauge [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Some partners of this pilot program include election officials in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Missouri, Virginia, Ohio, and Georgia."

4
loveshock 4 points ago +4 / -0

I so want this to be true.

2
iamherefortheluls 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would choose to isekai into a world where this is true, over any other fantasy.

4
Polygauge [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

My personal belief is that this resulted from the odd senate wins in 2018 going from red to blue.

1
JohnBarron 1 point ago +1 / -0

So much this, we saw it happen right before our eyes (those who paid attention) and trump was silent about it, I always found that odd. But its not odd if you were going to use it as a tool

1
Red_Turtle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could this explain why they were so quiet on the domestic terrorism of BML/antifa for the last few months? Trump had them playing the long game? Seems like this would involve a significant number of agents over time to plot.

2
Polygauge [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only time will tell

1
trump_navigator 1 point ago +1 / -0

This better not be another "just wait, the people behind the scenes are totally working on it, just sit back and let them handle it."

2
Polygauge [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lets hope its not

1
Polygauge [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

More info I've found regarding this: https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/471577-dhs-cyber-agency-invests-in-election-auditing-tool-to-secure-2020?amp&__twitter_impression=true

CISA Director Krebs has apparently spoke about tools to secure the election in the past.

Still working on finding more

1
Polygauge [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Some partners of this pilot program include election officials in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Missouri, Virginia, Ohio, and Georgia. “

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Pepedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

NO SUCH RELEASE HAS BEEN ISSUED BY DHS

1
Polygauge [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

indeed it has.

1
1
Polygauge [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Some partners of this pilot program include election officials in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Missouri, Virginia, Ohio, and Georgia. “

1
Pepedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

That link does not say what the tweet says AT ALL

1
Polygauge [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is a tool used to audit ballots.

That is likely what they'll be doing in battleground states.

Im sorry if you cant accept that

1
Pepedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your link has nothing to do with the release linked in the tweet, which says ink dot patterns were imprinted in the ballots.

The tool may exist....I'm not saying it doesn't. Im saying the two links do not reference or overlap each other.

1
1
Polygauge [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Some partners of this pilot program include election officials in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Missouri, Virginia, Ohio, and Georgia. “

0
Shalomtoyou 0 points ago +1 / -1

I saw this earlier and people shot it down as fake. Then a friend of mine sent me a clip to Brenden Dilley. Who also said it was bogus.

(Dilley said we need boots on the ground and it will be won in the courts, not to trust three letter agencies coming to our rescue. He may have said more, but I lost patience. Not because of his cursing, but because I get bored waiting 10 minutes for a guy to get to the point.)

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
5
Polygauge [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Have you see how many child trafficking have been busted?

These places can work if the garbage is preoccupied by something else.

Maybe, Idk, a probe into a former president and secretary of state?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
1
Polygauge [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Some partners of this pilot program include election officials in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Missouri, Virginia, Ohio, and Georgia. “

1
HillarysMingy 1 point ago +1 / -0

compartmentalization. They might of had the commies in our government working against themselves and they didn't even know it. Fingers crossed.