257
posted ago by dahdahdah_dahditdah ago by dahdahdah_dahditdah +257 / -0

Pedes, I have created a GitHub with reproducible Benfords Law analysis of Milwaukee vote anomalies. This is designed to be rapidly extensible. Please please please, suggest more suspicious datasets and I can rapidly add them to this analysis.

Here's the webpage:

https://voteanalysis.github.io/benfordslaw_election2020/

... and here's the github page so anybody can reproduce my results:

https://github.com/VoteAnalysis/benfordslaw_election2020

Comments (19)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

To make this case stronger, you could run the 2016/2012 data through the same process. Certain cities may just magically district with sizes that either cluster in the 1k range or the 5k range.

But if you show a clean 'control' example when fraud wasn't as extensive the case makes itself.

1
Salt_n_Pepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another pede earlier posted a link to a 2016 election study of Wisconsin done by Purdue University that proved back then there was no fraud (or very minimal fraud) in Wisconsin. The Benford's Law analysis of Wisconsin 2016 compared to 2020 shows enormous fraud took place there this year!