1044
A PATH TO INAUGURATION (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by wuhan ago by wuhan +1044 / -0
Comments (48)
sorted by:
62
colonial113 62 points ago +62 / -0

No no no fuck all this. We win with the votes, full stop. Exposing the fraud. That's where all this ends.

27
awooo 27 points ago +27 / -0

If we are going to get real election reform, this is what has to happen. Expose the fraud. It's obvious to us. It has to be obvious to everyone.

2
Nancypelosisoldliver 2 points ago +2 / -0

The media has been spending 3 days convincing their retard base that they haven't cheated at all so they'll never admit its happening because theyre too brainwashed. We're going to have to charge all their leaders with sedition and treason. Death penalty and yheyre going to reee but theyre the ones chopping kids genitals off soooooo its obvious were not the crazy ones here

18
conservativeyuppie 18 points ago +19 / -1

You can't. The well is poisoned too much and it's affected every vote. This is the Democrat legacy, they were so hell-bent on removing Trump that they've disenfranchised EVERY SINGLE VOTER. There should be no faith in the election system at this point, Trump has ripped the mask off of decades of fraud and corruption. The whole system needs to be reformed.

8
dixond 8 points ago +8 / -0

This 100%

8
MyDogCompletesMe 8 points ago +8 / -0

I agree. We won. We got all the votes. It's already ours. But I truly think Pelosi miscalculated on this.

Even if it does have to go to 12th Amendment, she's fucked.

1
Cbllbc 1 point ago +1 / -0

To paraphrase Arnold Schwarzenegger, "Fuck Plan B, we're going to win with Plan A."

21
PANTIFA 21 points ago +21 / -0

How is possible the electoral college won't pick a winner? 269 is impossible.

22
Nimble_navigator92 22 points ago +22 / -0

If Trump wins pa, az and nv, but loses georgia, it's 269 269

20
mintscape 20 points ago +20 / -0

You are right but my personal feelings are, why they hell would they rig everything like this and then allow that?

It's not like they are even being subtle.

13
kmillz 13 points ago +13 / -0

Well they might have been caught by surprise by Trump pulling off 1 more win than they planned for, that is one possibility.

10
Fuckingfuckers 10 points ago +10 / -0

Let's be real here, Trump mopped the floor with them. He's currently a few thousand votes away from breaking Obamas popular vote record. He won a lot more states than we think.

1
Nancypelosisoldliver 1 point ago +1 / -0

Without the dems cheating and trying as hard as they can to get everyone to look the other way trump probably had a historical record breaking landslide

3
Slowsuby 3 points ago +3 / -0

What if their intention wasn't to steal the election, but to create chaos? 269/269 creates a hell of a lot more chaos than a Biden win does.

9
OsakaRaccoon 9 points ago +9 / -0

There are currently 2 paths to 269 given AZ and Midwest litigation.

5
MyDogCompletesMe 5 points ago +5 / -0

269 to 269 could mathematically happen with our current map. I think that's why they're holding North Carolina.

14
MyDogCompletesMe 14 points ago +17 / -3

Isn't this what Pelosi was drooling over? Except she said that every DELEGATE gets a vote, not every state. That means Dems win, since they have the majority.

Yes, this is their whole plan in fact. Cause an illegitimate election, fall back on the House of Reps to choose President.

This is why we needed the Supreme Court.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
10
meteorknife 10 points ago +10 / -0

Its 100% state delegations and not individual delegates.

5
MyDogCompletesMe 5 points ago +5 / -0

in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.

So, is the above clause saying "each state" having one vote OR "the representation from each state" having one vote.

I do believe you are correct. The original framers of the constitution, who designed the electoral college, would not have wanted the majority of reps from one region to have an outsized weight in the outcome.

You have changed my mind, and you know what, I bet this is why Trump is so confident. You see -- he KNOWS that "The Crypt Keeper" (thanks @crusty_curmudgeon) has clearly misinterpreted the meaning of the clause. I believe the intent was that within each state, the reps get to choose 1 vote, and in the end there only 50 votes, of which Repubs have a majority.

Are you certain the House still maintains a State-wise majority of Republicans?

Honestly, my feeling is this needs to be kept quiet, otherwise if the dems realize this too quickly they'll find another cheat. Best if Trump springs it on them.

2
wuhan [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

One delegate per state. Steve Bannon has been explaining this process all week. Tune into his War Room livestreams daily on Facebook. It’s gold information that you need to hear. He’s 100% already set in stone Trump won.

14
ekos640 14 points ago +14 / -0

Bold of you to assume we can trust 27 out of 27 Republicans

6
MyDogCompletesMe 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's not 27 out of 27. Each individual state's Reps must vote on which President they wish. That means it's multiple Reps contending for one vote. Like all the Montana Reps must decide within their own membership who to choose. So every member of the house still gets a say, but New York would never have more weight in the outcome than Montana.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
9
CrQCQd1LE_TendiePede 9 points ago +9 / -0

If I never hear that s*** stain of a phrase "our democracy" again in the rest of my life, it will still be several lifetimes too f****** soon. You AmeriPedes have built and are blessed with the protection of living in a constitutional Republic. That shite left-leaning larp needs to head to the dustbin of History.

Don't forget that you have allies the whole way around the world right now 100% in your corner with this war. So far you have lost absolutely nothing. You've won the first battle and these c***s just shifted the goalposts to skew the picture. The king of 4D chess hasn't even moved his third pawn yet.

A quick message to the doomers: wake up to yourselves. Perhaps for the first time ever you're slowly coming to realise that there's more at stake than who wins the coolest frog meme of the day. Your negativity is fuelling their fires, not ours. Choose a f****** side, and get with the program. If you are not all in by now, either get there QuickSmart or f*** right off back to Reddit, Twitter and Facebook with the rest of these traitors.

Right now all we need is Soldiers holding the line. We do not have any provisions, time or sympathy spare for weak c***s right now. Simple as that.

KangaPede Out.

2
Nancypelosisoldliver 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amen

6
testingonetwothree 6 points ago +6 / -0

im confused - if they vote for pence trump becomes president?

17
ObongoForPrison2020 17 points ago +17 / -0

No, the House selects the President and the Senate selects the VP.

11
webeehai 11 points ago +11 / -0

In theory you could have a Trump presidency with a Harris as vice president.

13
veritasvincit 13 points ago +13 / -0

That would be a mega-cursed timeline.

3
Slowsuby 3 points ago +3 / -0

A quick moment of silence for all our fellow 'pedes stuck in that dark, dark timeline.

3
MyDogCompletesMe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Romney/Murkowski might vote for Harris but I think Collins would Vote for Trump, giving us 50/50. Not sure how the tie would be handled, maybe Pence would have to break the tie and vote for himself.

4
zestanor 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, this is only for a tie. If no electors are chosen in the first place (because of a dispute), the state legislatures pick the slate of electors. If this happened, we’d win all the contested states except Nevada.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MyDogCompletesMe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I really think we need to Lock this one up so Dems don't realize their error. Don't let the cat out of the bag.

1
Soulmask 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is a Rothschild calling the election for trump?

1
NADSAQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just shares a last name, he’s a regular dude from MD that reposts a lot of t_D content

1
mememak3 1 point ago +1 / -0

REMEMBER EACH DELEGATION NEEDS 2/3 TO SUPPORT THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.

they're fucked.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MyDogCompletesMe 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why this needs to be kept quiet. Trump is waiting for her to spring it on us. And when she misinterprets, Hello Supreme Court, I have a question....

1
CrQCQd1LE_TendiePede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Von Rothschild??

Rothschild.

Rothschild.

As in, possibly the wealthiest bloodline on the planet. Illuminati as they come. Crashed the British economic system and stole the bank of England during the Napoleonic Wars with a Transnational PsyOp, BACK THEN. Conspiracy NOT theory.

Anyone NOT know about them here? I'd be extremely surprised, except perhaps for some of the minipedes.

Dafuq?

Has to be a PsyOp. This family is evil incarnate, as far as I know.. Does this dood have ANY history of being based before this post? Anyone know where this imposter is coming from with this?

-3
deleted -3 points ago +5 / -8
4
Rerun1Central 4 points ago +5 / -1

TRY TO UNDERSTAND IT 1ST... NOT DUMB - YOU'RE DUMB

3
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 3 points ago +3 / -0

Contingent election is used if EC can not determine a winner. And as stated in OP, this is a vote from each state delegation, to be done after the new Congress is sworn in. If it gets to that point, we win

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

Problem is he gets 270 from PA and EC will say biden won

1
mostpeoplecallmeJim 1 point ago +1 / -0

They still have to certify

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

hopefully they aren't all dem run