9004
Comments (457)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
62
TheNewRepublic 62 points ago +65 / -3

Checkmate...He’s been saying this for a while, you’ll be stupid to think he didn’t put traps in.

18
deleted 18 points ago +21 / -3
8
Terriblesubreddit1 8 points ago +8 / -0

How can ballots be marked, aren’t they made by the states and not the federal government?

3
Slappysq 3 points ago +3 / -0

DHS was given authority over federal election security.

7
CrackaJack 7 points ago +7 / -0

Infowars is talking about it right now. Tune in

3
patriotblend 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pieczenik is the real deal. Fun fact, the character Jack Ryan was based on him in part because he was Tom Clancy's source for intelligence and the military and international operations. The guy used to overthrow dictators for a living.

Buckle up isn't quite a strong enough phrase for this one

2
CRobinsFly 2 points ago +2 / -0

When I originally heard about this, it seemed farfetched and excessively complex. "where'd the ballots go, how would you tell it was fraudulent?" Thanks for the link. Now, it makes a little more sense, all were marked so any one that isn't, is fake. Throw away potentially pallets worth of ballots. On top of this, they have evidence of fraud from people who actively engaged in it or at least knew about it. Could be massive arrests and they saw this coming via the NG deployments.

One thing I did find humorous was in one of the tweets they said they were marked with non-radioactive isotopes. There is a lot of things it could have been marked with then. Besides the lack of capability to detect the watermark, how does the non-radioactivity even matter? Why not just barcode them?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0