Right now nobody knows what anybody else's play is.
We knew they'd cheat but waiting to see what their plan is. If they stop cheating in N.C. and PA and call it for Trump it's something that HAS to be looked at later, but we will have the time to do it.
They are already compiling the list of invalid voters for NV (Dead, moved out of state) which should give a victory there. Next up should be MI since the fraud is big, overt, and has the public's attention. After that, the election is rightfully his and then we have four years to ensure this mail-in garbage never happens again.
Personally, I used to go to the gym and they required a fingerprint. That's what I would like. Can't say we are suppressing the votes of people without fingerprints and it would be dead simple to prevent multiple votes.
Well, while I think Trump, his administration, and his supporters all see that to be the case that they're one and the same, broad optically the average person (read swing voter/ independents) might just see what happens next to be about Trump trying to ensure a victory when he lost, similar to Kerry with the recounts with Bush.
The truth is it was Trump who had the election stolen from him, but I just think for the average person they're trying to clarify that this was a corruption of justice no matter who is doing it, or who it was done to.
Election integrity assures a Trump victory.
Right now nobody knows what anybody else's play is.
We knew they'd cheat but waiting to see what their plan is. If they stop cheating in N.C. and PA and call it for Trump it's something that HAS to be looked at later, but we will have the time to do it.
They are already compiling the list of invalid voters for NV (Dead, moved out of state) which should give a victory there. Next up should be MI since the fraud is big, overt, and has the public's attention. After that, the election is rightfully his and then we have four years to ensure this mail-in garbage never happens again.
Personally, I used to go to the gym and they required a fingerprint. That's what I would like. Can't say we are suppressing the votes of people without fingerprints and it would be dead simple to prevent multiple votes.
Well, while I think Trump, his administration, and his supporters all see that to be the case that they're one and the same, broad optically the average person (read swing voter/ independents) might just see what happens next to be about Trump trying to ensure a victory when he lost, similar to Kerry with the recounts with Bush.
The truth is it was Trump who had the election stolen from him, but I just think for the average person they're trying to clarify that this was a corruption of justice no matter who is doing it, or who it was done to.
Scorched Earth on all communists.
You can't have one without the other.