2447
posted ago by Barbocus ago by Barbocus +2447 / -0

How do I get this file to the Trump team?

https://pastebin.com/269wKj34

I wrote some python code that checks this URL https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/detroitnews, based on a list of voters in Detroit. Looks extremely suspicious!!!!

~40% of these folks have obituaries!!!!!!

Edit: This one has the links: https://pastebin.com/gb3NWc4i

Comments (78)
sorted by:
75
bellcurvestrikesback 75 points ago +75 / -0

Send this to project veritas too

30
tragician 30 points ago +30 / -0

Spread this far and wide. I will do my best posting in comments sections under bernie tweets. The meme war must go on

5
Ladybug87 5 points ago +5 / -0

We should do this for Georgia as well. Especially now that Biden has flipped the state by a handful of votes.

57
deleted 57 points ago +57 / -0
40
deleted 40 points ago +40 / -0
50
bangbus 50 points ago +50 / -0

Snopes Fact Check: An obituary and a death certificate are not conclusive proof that someone is deceased! Orange Man Bad!

10
HatnNewLognReqs 10 points ago +10 / -0

Kek

3
Lord_Kek 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dead people are citizens, too, bigot!

1
spezisapedo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I also heard that orange man was bad. VERIFIED.

13
BidenCrimeFamily 13 points ago +13 / -0

"I iDeNtIfY aS a DeAd PeRsOn" - some libcuck

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
LockeThePatriot 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why identify when you could transition, my sweet little Marxist?

1
HatnNewLognReqs 1 point ago +1 / -0

be committed and you will succeed!

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
nowrongwrong 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, they're just pining for the fjords.

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
16
2scoops2020 16 points ago +16 / -0

I manually reviewed the same dataset here: https://thedonald.win/p/11PpFywNIi/fraud-uncovered-13405-detroit-vo/

I don't think its 40%. I found SSA records for 14 that definitely are deceased, and another 11 obituaries matching birth/death dates, and another 33 obits that are more loosely correlated. Still a big deal.

10
Barbocus [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yours seems much more granular, mine was just a rough name match, but either way there seems to be patterns of meaningful fraud.

5
2scoops2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

Definitely worth looking into.

1
spezisapedo 1 point ago +1 / -0

a rough name match is NOT good data. You need to put that caveat in the post. Still could be important, but we need to not get duped into believing fake news.

15
lanre 15 points ago +15 / -0

Can you share the python code?

15
Barbocus [S] 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's in a notebook, I have to clean it up a bit then I could share.

4
Cloraxland_ 4 points ago +5 / -1

Notebook? Did you manually type it in or something into python IDLE?

8
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 8 points ago +8 / -0

Probably more like Jupyter

11
Barbocus [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes, Jupyter Lab

1
spezisapedo 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol. LEARN TO CODE.

2
daty_dato 2 points ago +3 / -1

You either have a python or you don't. That's the code.

15
Registered 15 points ago +15 / -0

Can you please put this in a TABLE with links so that EVERYONE will understand it?

9
HatnNewLognReqs 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yodels in Jeb

Bar chaaaaaart

12
H4yw1r3 12 points ago +12 / -0

do the obituary details match the deceased or is it john smith and john smith?

17
Barbocus [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

Some details, many match, some could be erroneous matches on common names, but even if it's 50% wrong, that's horrible fraud!!!!

12
H4yw1r3 12 points ago +12 / -0

rerun it to include the links from the obituary site so someone working it can quickly check em

5
Barbocus [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good idea!

19
H4yw1r3 19 points ago +19 / -0

i do investigative data analysis for a big company, the easier you can make manual validation of your datasets, the better. hell make a 2nd column that has a the obit page in a html tagged hyperlink so you can open it as html in a browser ;)

10
Barbocus [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm adding that now.

8
Barbocus [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

This one has the links: https://pastebin.com/gb3NWc4i

7
HatnNewLognReqs 7 points ago +7 / -0

I've never seen autists live...

🤭🍿 🍿 🍿

4
Registered 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly THIS ^^^

6
Hairy_Mouse 6 points ago +6 / -0

Exactly if this many were already found so quickly, it's GUARANTEED that there are many, MANY more.

2
2020REBOUND 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some details, many match, some could be erroneous matches on common names, but even if it's 50% wrong, that's horrible fraud!!!!

You did great work. A dedicated person at the campaign or us could verify these and surely would find some .

10
DRKMSTR 10 points ago +10 / -0

Do you need more data?

I have chunked apart the voter rolls in Michigan.

10 excel spreadsheets, about 800,000 names on each.

Pulling one up and sorting by Date of Birth......1800-1925 has 4322 voters, another and 1800-1925 has 4461 voters.

So extrapolating that out, I have a list of approximately 43k voters over the age of 95.

It's the full 8 million list.

Let me know. https://i.maga.host/XSRVX1y.png

8
Barbocus [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm happy to run the older folks in Michigan through the same process. It would be interesting to see how the % changes.

4
DRKMSTR 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can compress it down, what age-range do you want?

7
Barbocus [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Start with 90+, I'll have to run it slower so I don't break the site or somehow get shutout.

5
DRKMSTR 5 points ago +5 / -0

90+....so....Oh dear.

~100k voters :P

Give me half an hour.

What's a good hosting website to drop the data? Do you want Excel or .CSV?

4
Barbocus [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

csv would be best, not sure how to share the data.

1
Barbocus [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also, is your list folks that actually voted or requested a ballot?

1
DRKMSTR 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is registered voter as of OCT 2020 (Does not account for those registered on election day, which was apparently 50% or more in some areas)

9
shitPostingChamp 9 points ago +9 / -0

You are a warrior. Thank you.

8
Markdin7725 8 points ago +8 / -0

This needs a sticky. Politifuck and sNOPEs are trying their damndest to disprove dead voters, especially the one Flecca found on twitter.

Can someone link me the thread we had counting all the dead voters found so far? there were literally dozens just on that post.

7
hloblart 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Pastebin’s SMART filters have detected potentially offensive or questionable content ahead. The content you are about to view has been deemed potentially offensive or questionable by our filters, because of this, you’re receiving this warning. You can continue ahead at your own risk or go back. "

I know I shouldn't be surprised anymore...

Also they imply it is an algorithm. Unless they have dead voters names in their algorithm, or they flag anything coming from here, a person flagged this as offensive.

3
MrDonaldTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Came here to post same thing. SMH, clown world we live in these days.

5
Bjc112 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sticky! Let's use this code everywhere and expose these fucking commies!

5
Drumburt 5 points ago +5 / -0

This was a landslide!

5
Wmmiv2016 5 points ago +5 / -0

Weaponized Autism!!!

4
JamesSunderland 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is anyone else getting the "Warning - Potentially offensive content ahead!" from the pastebin with the links?

3
Barbocus [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, just click through it, I think it's because I added the links that have the work "Obituary"

3
Trumpnado_warning 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep - I got that warning

3
MAGA_4EVER 3 points ago +3 / -0

Send this to trump and veritas!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Iknowityouknowit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Up! Up! Up!

Maybe sticky this!

2
MAGAdadUSA 2 points ago +2 / -0

They probably passed away right after voting Biden, which would explain no down vote.....

2
nerdly1234 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nerd!! Love it! You pedes are the best!

2
chopz 2 points ago +2 / -0

WOW that's a big deal

1
BarronTrump2032 1 point ago +1 / -0

Man, kamela absolutely crushed it with the zombie demographic...

1
Afeazo 1 point ago +2 / -1

Can you share your code?

1
MAH3A2HO 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've gone through part of the list, roughly 92 names starting with the earliest date ballots were requested and found 56 that all show up as being registered on the same date (making them all about 70-75 at the time of voter registration). There were some registered on the same day at 2 different addresses. Made a post about this earlier here https://thedonald.win/p/11PpFwfqya/going-through-csv-dump-from-http/c/ and used this site to check the names https://www.michiganresidentdatabase.com/. It would be interesting to search through some younger lists to see if there's another common reg. date that's more recent, just find it odd that all these people in their 70's register for the first time and have then been voting ever since, unless they are dead or don't exist.

1
Farage_massage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Run for all ages with cross reference on middle initial?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Frednut1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where did this data come from?

1
2020REBOUND 1 point ago +1 / -0

Edward Leonard Is 96 and none of the guys at that link match him:

https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/detroitnews/obituary-search.aspx?daterange=99999&firstname=EDWARD&lastname=LEONARD&countryid=1&stateid=26&affiliateid=all

Have to really match the birthdates and names.Names not enough.

3
Barbocus [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

He seems to be 97, close and I don't know how accurate the original data is...just a granular check, you are right it would have to be investigated more closely, but how may Edward Leonard's of that age could there be? It is a common name, so maybe.

3
2020REBOUND 3 points ago +3 / -0

For some you find newspaper articles and stuff, correlate the family etc.

A dedicated person(from the campaign?) who also would make calls could easily verify each of them.

THIS IS A VERY GOOD PRE SELECTION!