Gab Comment... maybe this is why they froze the counting.
"IF the rumored watermarks on ballots proves true, and if Trump informed the governors of the swing states of this fact shortly before they freaked out and froze the counting, then they would have been forced into trying to undo the fuckery they were up to. The only way they can get out of a full-blown audit of all the fraud going on would be to count the votes so that Trump wins at the end of the day."
I still have my un-used mail in ballot for CA (I moved to TN, registered here and voted in person). I'm looking for any watermarks but cant see any on mine.. Does that possibly mean that since I registered republican in California that I received a phony ballot or am I missing something?
So that's how hard it is to see on a normal sheet of paper, and according to the OP on watermarking ballots it would have been done in UV ink and not yellow, making the codes even harder to spot.
So no--I suspect this is a red herring for whatever reason (Troll, LARPer, or a person who's ballot got debris on it from another source, such as they left it near their printer and specks of toner found their way into it.)
Gab Comment... maybe this is why they froze the counting.
"IF the rumored watermarks on ballots proves true, and if Trump informed the governors of the swing states of this fact shortly before they freaked out and froze the counting, then they would have been forced into trying to undo the fuckery they were up to. The only way they can get out of a full-blown audit of all the fraud going on would be to count the votes so that Trump wins at the end of the day."
No clue if this is legit but it is interesting.
I still have my un-used mail in ballot for CA (I moved to TN, registered here and voted in person). I'm looking for any watermarks but cant see any on mine.. Does that possibly mean that since I registered republican in California that I received a phony ballot or am I missing something?
I'm sorry I can't answer that. She seems to be implying that the watermark are a sequence of tiny dots.
The dots would be damn near invisible and microscopic. Watch this video from the EFF:
https://youtu.be/izMGMsIZK4U
So that's how hard it is to see on a normal sheet of paper, and according to the OP on watermarking ballots it would have been done in UV ink and not yellow, making the codes even harder to spot.
So no--I suspect this is a red herring for whatever reason (Troll, LARPer, or a person who's ballot got debris on it from another source, such as they left it near their printer and specks of toner found their way into it.)