8202
Comments (1050)
sorted by:
354
Faffz [M] 354 points ago +361 / -7 stickied

I randomly chose one. Line 19. NORMA,HARMON,1919,49242 I duck duck go'd her name and found this: https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/39745450/norma-a_-harmon

Try her name. Birth month is Aug.

485
Wrexxis780 485 points ago +487 / -2

Michigan takes down the website in 3...2...1...

265
deleted 265 points ago +265 / -0
173
StillplayenSometimes 173 points ago +175 / -2

State will prob say "Taken down for techinal issues" and people will believe it

138
deleted 138 points ago +138 / -0
104
ChokingOnARedpill 104 points ago +105 / -1

covid

82
TonsOfSalt 82 points ago +82 / -0

Socially distanced the website from view.

33
PolarBears4Trump2020 33 points ago +33 / -0

Whitmer's got her eye on that website. Website is frightened

10
CuomoisaMassMurderer 10 points ago +10 / -0

Whitless should be scared.

5
epaminondas 5 points ago +5 / -0

Group of Bernie bros were staging an attack on it in MI, so it was taken down to protect it.

4
wernerziegler 4 points ago +4 / -0

Whitmer is frightened that she's the one that filled the voter rolls with dead people.

23
Lenny_Kravitz2 23 points ago +23 / -0

The webserver had a dry cough and loss of taste so we quarantined it for 14 days, per the CDC's guidance.

11
CuomoisaMassMurderer 11 points ago +11 / -0

Then they put it on a ventilator and it died. Nothing else could be done.

10
Lenny_Kravitz2 10 points ago +10 / -0

RIP serverdude =(

9
electioninfection 9 points ago +9 / -0

Covid to get more federal funds! Win!

6
ICantREEEE 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm sure it's all being archived. We have the best autists folks!

23
JudicialDredd 23 points ago +23 / -0

6 months later. Thanks for waiting, sites back up!

9
Cirruspede 9 points ago +9 / -0

Like, with a cloth

17
bigdickhangsright 17 points ago +17 / -0

A water pipe a few blocks over broke so we have to take the website offline.

7
mickusa1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Goddamn! Younger me laughing!!

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
11
DJTrump 11 points ago +11 / -0

Optics. We can do and say what we want at the moment because they aren't going to be going around arresting Trump supporters right now.

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not just yet. Wait until the great reset is upon us along with the vaccine. Do you know what they have planned?

1
SNOWBREAKS 1 point ago +1 / -0

I for one, love our Zeta Reticulan Over-Gods!

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

What, no culling by the Wraith?!? Joking aside though, Canada and New Zealand have some info in the planning stages that is no doubt the globohomo's blueprint for the rest of the 5 eyes including the US, and perhaps the rest of the world.

1
mickusa1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Love the optics...

7
Necrovoter 7 points ago +7 / -0

Working at the time of this posting. Downloaded the entire file (14,517 names). Picked number 14,468 MURMER (first name) HESTER (last name) 1919 48186 Plugged it in, got a hit on May as birth month. Hester, despite being dead in 2005, is registered to vote in MI.

A search reveals that:

"Murmer W Hester was born on May 13, 1919. Murmer died on October 15, 2005 at 86 years of age. We know that Murmer W Hester had been residing in Westland, Wayne County, Michigan 48186."

The MI website doesn't show a recorded 2020 ballot for Hester. Maybe Hester's ballot is one of the one they are waiting to "find" should they need more.

8
Necrovoter 8 points ago +8 / -0

Pastebin has already tagged it:

"Warning - Potentially offensive content ahead! Pastebin’s SMART filters have detected potentially offensive or questionable content ahead. The content you are about to view has been deemed potentially offensive or questionable by our filters, because of this, you’re receiving this warning. You can continue ahead at your own risk or go back."

The truth is potentially offensive!

Leftists are the scum of the Earth.

2
DonaIdTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Still doing it this morning and it works.

38
alpha_omega 38 points ago +38 / -0

Video record yourself doing to the search, publish to non-cucked video sites that won't take it down. If thousands of us do it and sign affidavits it will be accepted as evidence regardless of the presence of the database. In fact in that case if they take down the database or tamper with it, it'll be evidence against them.

5
Brutusmaximus101 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fucking brilliant idea lad.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
94
paganbutterchurner 94 points ago +96 / -2

fucking do-over right now. NO MAIL IN

17
logan34 17 points ago +17 / -0

How can you confirm the list is legit? The voter name list? Anybody?

31
Wrexxis780 31 points ago +31 / -0

If the list wasn't legitimate, you wouldn't find the results on the site. I'm from MI. You need your name, birthdate, and zip code to find yourself, or you can use your Driver's liscence number.

23
Uwjuebs 23 points ago +23 / -0

I tried 5 names, all were registered but only one, Ruth Suart, 1919, January, 49546 had voted. I looked her up online and no obituaries for michigan. According to beenverified.com she is still alive. Also, these names are from all over Michigan, not just Wayne County.

14
sesquipedalian 14 points ago +14 / -0

Tried a couple myself. Same result. Two old possibly dead people who are registered but did not request an absentee ballot.

24
MAGAlikethis 24 points ago +24 / -0

Here's all of the ones who voted: https://pastebin.com/XEi5Uy6t

2
latic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this confirmed dead and voted or just voted?

1
sesquipedalian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice. Thanks.

8
CuomoisaMassMurderer 8 points ago +8 / -0

They could still have voted without requesting an absentee ballot. In MI could they have voted early without that request?

3
sesquipedalian 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not sure. With the unsolicited vote by mail ballots that are not absentee ballots, it's possible. I don't know what states or who received them though.

13
Alex355f1 13 points ago +15 / -2

this needs to be worded carefully as something to investigate and not as a confirmed fact, if it's not 100% confirmed then it will be used as a weapon against our party...

9
CuomoisaMassMurderer 9 points ago +9 / -0

We need to forget all about this muh optics stuff. Don't fight fire with fire. Fighting to win means striking at every possible weakness. If we find enough instances of dead people supposedly having cast ballots, that's evidence. Just one person is evidence, but they can play dumb and pretend it's a fluke. Really all we're doing is trying to win this without war. Legal and peaceful is better.

3
Balzenburg 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can tell if they are registered and if they requested an absentee ballot. The other take is having a lot of dead registered voters inflates the registries so that turnout doesn't look even more insane in these heavily liberal areas.

Next target should be Milwaukee. They have insane turnout as it is. Once you take off the dead people or people who moved out of state the fraud is even more obvious.

3
RexCollumSilvarum 3 points ago +3 / -0

I tried 5 names, all were registered but only one, Ruth Suart, 1919, January, 49546 had voted. I looked her up online and no obituaries for michigan. According to beenverified.com she is still alive

Inevitably these kinds of searches are going to pull up false positives. If Ms. Stuart, aged 101, voted for Biden then I respect her wishes. Maybe she's an old-school Democrat who misses the JFK days. Maybe she's slipping a bit mentally and identifies with Mister Badakathcare. (I kid.)

But we shouldn't let these cases deter us from finding the 90+% of "100-year-olds" who have passed from this earth and whose votes are fabrications.

1
Balzenburg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Found 5 of 7 that were over 115 years old and still registered.

1
RexCollumSilvarum 1 point ago +1 / -0

If there are five people in the state of Michigan who are that old, I'll eat my hat. Your findings show that they're cheating.

1
Uwjuebs 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish it had been presented accurately. Such as: why does Michigan (3% of the US population) have 14,000 people over 100 on the voter rolls (20% of people over 100 in the US)?

10
ADAM_SCHITT 10 points ago +10 / -0

I looked up like 5 random names. A couple I couldn't get the obituaries to get the birth month. I found two names that were registered and did not vote and the rest I couldn't find at all. This might just be a list of registered dead people.

1
latic 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can just select the birth month and select submit until it works

8
Jimmy_Russler 8 points ago +8 / -0

This, I demand a source now. Last person who posted this only had 2 posts in their history so this could be a red herring to throw us off or discredit evidence of voter fraud

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

You have missed the point, entirely.

4
Jimmy_Russler 4 points ago +4 / -0

How so?

5
latic 5 points ago +5 / -0

You can verify them yourselves. The title is 100% misleading, this is a list of registered voters who are old. Lots are being found dead and have still voted.

The compiled list of people thought to be dead and have voted is https://pastebin.com/XEi5Uy6t

1
Dergy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice list. Good work.

1
Jimmy_Russler 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right but where did the list of registered voters come from? The primary source. I doubt many people over 100 are still alive, surely not 14k in one state.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

The point is to divide the work and see how many instances of fraud we can find in this batch. It's a great thing to do. If qe find 0, that would be great. People have found many so far.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
warkyd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not all of them. For example, VIOLET,SAWYER,1916,48762 has no record, even if you try all 12 months for birth.

2
Bullet3250 2 points ago +2 / -0

She did pass away...

Violet Evelyn Scott Sawyer BIRTH 22 Apr 1916 Thorndale, Middlesex County, Ontario, Canada

DEATH 6 Jul 2017 (aged 101) Spruce, Alcona County, Michigan, USA

Born in Canada.... was married....

2
pure_focused_autism 2 points ago +2 / -0

Congrats Violet for reaching such a ripe old age! Rest in peace.

1
warkyd 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're right. Not sure why it didn't come up last night.

2
Bullet3250 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oddly, Michigan data base shows MORE GOP voters requested Absentee Ballots then Democrats...

AND ...

MORE GOP voters RETURNED Absentee Ballots then Democrats...

with about 20% Absentee requests and returns not party affiliated.

Does not really add up.

1
B4OPENSPACE 1 point ago +1 / -0

What vote number is violet evelyn scott sawyer. I don't see her name on the 1,362 names

1
Bullet3250 1 point ago +1 / -0

I did not download the pastbin data... I no longer have access to that data bin... I think I was just trying to verify she did pass away - and found her name and zip code in a grave finder app.

1
Dergy 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is a record for her. She was born in June. She's reg'd but no voting activity.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
Balzenburg 2 points ago +2 / -0

I subscribe to the theory that they planned to cheat. Ballots were arranged by categories in terms of how obvious it is that they are dead / out of state. You cheat just enough to win. The bigger trump's lead on election night you start digging into the more desperate registered voters 100+ years old. We may have them.

Compare these voters to the mysterious Biden votes without a down ballot selection and there it is.

4
TheFountainhead 4 points ago +4 / -0

If they call a re-vote, suddenly voting in person will show a spike in COVID deaths, which will also be used as cover for why so many voters are dead...

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Many dead voters can be arranged.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +2 / -7
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
61
ChuckedBeef 61 points ago +61 / -0 (edited)

Secret service needs to seize these servers IMMEDIATELY.

44
EagleI 44 points ago +44 / -0

Please not the FBI...

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
11
BigMikesBlackCock 11 points ago +11 / -0

I also lost all my guns in a boating accident in michigan

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
BigMikesBlackCock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also lost all my ammo

3
mickusa1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Omg 😱 did your guns “drown”

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
ChuckedBeef 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup, not the FBM.

11
Kekintosh2020 11 points ago +12 / -1

Proud Boys!

11
deleted 11 points ago +13 / -2
1
mickusa1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Woah woah woooah... po-boyz....... getdatshit right maaan..... Jeb G-(guac) Bush even knows that my nigga...

3
electioninfection 3 points ago +3 / -0

Po boys. Delicious!

1
holliday50 1 point ago +2 / -1

Don't worry. Crowdstrike will investigate the server.

1
mickusa1 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know I heard they found nuching...

45
EagleI 45 points ago +46 / -1 (edited)

ARCHIVE AND BACKUP EVERYTHING!!!!

EDIT: Since mods are deleting my other posts on this thread (for some unknown reason), I;; add this here. I looked one up (Irene Drought). They are registered to vote but didn't cast an absentee ballot according to the state website. Either the post title is misleading or MI is hiding the info online now.

46
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
12
practicalize 12 points ago +12 / -0

No, because the response to each voter request form is different. But they are the easiest to investigate if there comes a legal battle.

I’ll update if I think of some way to archive the response.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
Diet_Loam 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lots of screenshots can be from different people can be used as evidence of it having existed. Document everything!

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
centispide 3 points ago +3 / -0

Glad someone did this. The pastebin original is already down. The leftists are censoring HARD and everywhere!!

21
deleted 21 points ago +22 / -1
266
red_xi 266 points ago +269 / -3

ALEX JONES IS IN PHOENIX LEADING THE CHARGE!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX3tqxi1Vkc

137
Wtf_socialismreally 137 points ago +137 / -0

Seeing that on RSBN right now, I gotta be honest I might flip on my opinion on Alex.

I've been pretty negative lately but he's getting out and having a ground game.

74
deleted 74 points ago +83 / -9
66
MageGills 66 points ago +66 / -0

Honestly his claims are typically more on point than people realize.

43
the_neon_cowboy 43 points ago +43 / -0

even the wild ones like making the frogs gay, it was real

24
Suo_Tamaki 24 points ago +24 / -0

He's either 5 years ahead or 5 realities beside. No middle ground.

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Our reality has leapfrogged 5 years. Or maybe that leapgayfrogged, either way. Most of what he's been talking about all along has been proven true this year.

2
The_RedWolf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Using that next time I need to describe his theories

4
RexCollumSilvarum 4 points ago +4 / -0

He mixes over-the-top crazy stuff in so that it's not as obvious how on-point he is with certain important things.

1
HK417 1 point ago +1 / -0

but is is so distracting last time I seen him he was doing a big interview with a big name can't even remember who was all there but they where talking about normal stuff and he railroads he whole talk when he goes off on a tangent about moon lizards.

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
14
K-Harbour 14 points ago +15 / -1

Alex Jones’ claims just need a time shift put on them. At time 0 they are Luney Bin. At time +1 they are outrageous. At time +2 they are prophetic. At time +4 they are Ho Hum.

11
MegaMagaManX 11 points ago +11 / -0

He was way ahead of the game, screw Dems and the deep state coining the "conspiracy theory" to immediately discredit.

It's all been trickling out as true

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
12
MegaMagaManX 12 points ago +12 / -0

That and all the: don't mix business and politics, bars and politics, holidays and politics. Fucking bullshit is why we're where we are today. They stripped any intimate person to person sharing of information. Pushed all their chips in on misinformation media and celebrities to push their propaganda

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
an_original_username 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow. I never put those together until now.

8
CuomoisaMassMurderer 8 points ago +8 / -0

The origin of that phrase becoming widely used needs to be well known: CIA used it to discredit anyone who knew what was going on when the gulf of Tonkin event was false flagged as a means to get the American people to support entering the Vietnam war.

The gulf of Tonkin event never happened. This is known. It wasn't a conspiracy theory at all, it was FACT. Told by those who love the US vastly more than the CIA was ever capable of. Anytime you want to use the term "conspiracy theory," don't, in light of this. Any time you see someone else use it, realize they probably aren't a government agent trying to discredit someone who really knows what's up, but it's as likely as the person they're accusing actually being correct. IOW, ignore it completely. Anyone accusing "conspiracy theory" is automatically an idiot.

4
MegaMagaManX 4 points ago +4 / -0

Precisely! Heard the term coincidence skeptic used alternatively, pretty much discredits their label attempt

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Two_Scoops__ 1 point ago +1 / -0

What units you using there

8
SexualTyrannosaurus 8 points ago +8 / -0

+ bro. + is winning. - is for losers.

+ 0 time unit? present.

+ 1 time unit? not quite as bat shit crazy

+ 2 time unit? omg that crazy bastard was right

+ 3 time unit? everyone knows the chemicals turn frogs gay

+ 4 time unit? Baron Trump, 1893 Time Traveler.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's how leaders are defined.

8
ProfessorRomendev 8 points ago +8 / -0

You just reminded me of his ‘I’m kinda retarded’ comment, and now I’m going to bed with a smile

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
HK417 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you search google for "I’m kinda retarded" it is the only thing on the first page LMAO

4
Philmor_Tittus 4 points ago +6 / -2

He is a retard. But damnit he’s kind of our retard. Lol

-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
1
ThickCheney 1 point ago +1 / -0

If he didn’t sperg out, nobody would know.

43
red_xi 43 points ago +43 / -0

can't afford to gatekeep rn

37
dakin116 37 points ago +37 / -0

Alex has been a beast for months now

10
Wtf_socialismreally 10 points ago +10 / -0

I just didn't like how he treated Millie Weaver, but he's getting out there right now and building crowds. That's not the behavior of controlled opposition.

8
prayinpede 8 points ago +8 / -0

I kinda got the feeling he was distancing himself from her but he also has a huge org that could be taken down that he has to look out for. Many have been trying to take it down for years. With rico type laws and over zealous prosecutors with limitless resources, he couldn't fight it. Apparently fighting the Sandy Hook thing almost bankrupted him. If push came to shove i think he'd be on the front lines like a true patriot.

13
brxn 13 points ago +13 / -0

Sandy Hook was bullshit.

7
prayinpede 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah i dont see how he could be held responsible. He didn't call for people to harass. Should be protected speech.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Explain "fighting the Sandy Hook thing?"

3
k614 3 points ago +4 / -1

I never got the whole "controlled opposition" thing. It's more of a thing people say because "it's a cool thing to say", and never produce proof on how he would be "controlled opposition"

6
Wtf_socialismreally 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well...Fox is controlled opposition and they proved that, so it's more than just the cool thing to say ya know?

3
k614 3 points ago +3 / -0

I get the Fox thing and there is plenty of evidence. I am referencing "controlled opposition" with respect to Alex Jones. Notice I put "he" in the second sentence.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've never really felt like he was really controlled opposition either. I just didn't like some of the things he did, notably the Millie Weaver thing.

I did watch him during election time 2016 primarily though, where he was very high energy.

2
Juanye 2 points ago +2 / -0

Millie got played. Not by alex

4
2020_Vision 4 points ago +4 / -0

decades*

31
prayinpede 31 points ago +31 / -0

His delivery takes getting use to but he loves America and freedom. There's crazy shit going on in the world that i hope and pray isnt true.

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh it's true. satan has two primary tactics: convince people he isn't there so he can subtly go unopposed, and act so outrageously that no one believes it.

13
ChuckedBeef 13 points ago +13 / -0

1776!!!!!

57
deleted 57 points ago +58 / -1
23
dakin116 23 points ago +23 / -0

Yep, calling out the covid hoax and correctly calling it's connection to what's happening right now

17
BasedRedPillZeus 17 points ago +17 / -0

He’s been fighting for your liberty for decades. He’s a patriot and an American hero.

2
K-Harbour 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even if half the people think he is a mossad agent!

3
one_out_of_many 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bill Hicks was too far before his time.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
13
iamherefortheluls 13 points ago +13 / -0

he predicted Fox behavior during election, 2 days prior.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
5
itswood 5 points ago +6 / -1

I saw that clip - it was almost surreal the accuracy in which he called it - "Expect a news organization to call it early for Biden, before the polls are even close to finished. It would make most sense if it was Fox -since that gives it a semblance of not being biased" - I totally paraphrased/butchered that quote, but you get the idea.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Define "showing up," please. What do you think is appropriate?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-1
CuomoisaMassMurderer -1 points ago +1 / -2

I never want to discourage anyone from being involved in any way they think best. Elections are supposed to show numbers. They're trying to steal every seat they can, not just POTUS.

I think every effort is worthwhile. Some may be more helpful than others. War is the last recourse.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
24
RedditIs4Retards 24 points ago +26 / -2

If Dems win, Alex Jones will be the first one they execute in public.

And libtards will clap.

-11
cheesecakelove -11 points ago +6 / -17

No. No they won’t.

25
RedditIs4Retards 25 points ago +25 / -0

Yes they will, they want us dead

5
CuomoisaMassMurderer 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think he's saying we won't let them execute Alex, and he won't exactly go without a fight.

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

Literally and factually untrue. They absolutely would be. Browse Twitter when ever someone is killed by AntiFA. Look at all the Twitter posts from the President while he was sick.

No, you're wrong and it's demonstrable.

3
wholesomekangz100 3 points ago +3 / -0

You really think that these NPCs wouldn't commit atrocities? Look up Stanford prison experiments and then look up TDS that these people. Then look up atrocities committed throughout human history.

Doesn't take a lot to put two and two together. You won't get it because abstract thinking is a high IQ trait (midwits need not apply)

12
TravisRSCX 12 points ago +12 / -0

He took his super vitality max tonight lol

8
Magamom 8 points ago +8 / -0

You know I just told my husband that I don't follow Alex Jones..i was thinking hes just there for the lols but right now, we need every support we can get and hes the one taking the charge. Hes the one going out there and fighting on the ground... while everyone else in the gop is measured by their tweets or non-tweets. At least lindsey graham gave money... and Barr will always hand us his everlasting sleep. F*cking ghost.

1
Johnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

He does not keep his eye on the ball on many ideas. His enthusiasm helps some cases, I suppose.

1
itswood 1 point ago +2 / -1

I never was a big follower of his. But I always thought to myself that much like our President, Jones had his reputation trashed on the daily by MSM, and then he started getting censored, and finally deplatformed. These treasonous cunts aren't exactly creative with how they try and take down their opposition.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
232
KeysToNeW 232 points ago +235 / -3 (edited)

Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa....the geniuses have VERIFIED, on the government website, that FOURTEEN THOUSAND DEAD PEOPLE, IN A SINGLE COUNTY, voted three days ago?

Hol' up. BS. They're registered. Here's the real question. Did they show up to vote in person??????

135
deleted 135 points ago +137 / -2
66
Ladybug87 66 points ago +66 / -0

They need to check this for each state. Pam Bondi and the Trump team have found thousands in NV either dead or that have moved out (checked against change of address registries) and now this in Michigan. Georgia and Pennsylvania at least, because it's going to be close.

39
deleted 39 points ago +39 / -0
16
TonsOfSalt 16 points ago +17 / -1

I tried it on 7 of them at random. They were all registered, but none had voted.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
TrumpaSoros-Flex 4 points ago +4 / -0

names?

3
TonsOfSalt 3 points ago +4 / -1

I closed the tabs, was just checking for myself but you're welcome to do it too. It's not that hard to cut/paste and go through the birth months until it gets through.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
SnowflakeJuice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did you try all the months for each one?

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you sure they hadn't voted? Or could you just check that they hadn't requested an absentee ballot?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
Sbstn -2 points ago +1 / -3

You need to prove they're actually dead though

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
14
DaayTerkErJerbs 14 points ago +14 / -0

They cheated everywhere NV, AZ, WI, MI, PA, GA, NC, MN, TX

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's almost 20% of States, but not "everywhere." I bet they cheated in the other 80% of States

2
Balzenburg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Milwaukee will be the biggest offender. Look at their turnout with Biden getting better numbers than Obama in 2008.

Turnout is said to be 5.5 standard deviations from the norm. Although this was a different year with mail in vote that is an insane number.

17
45willwinagain 17 points ago +17 / -0

But it's 14k in one single county alone... 14,000 dead people requested and received an absentee ballot.

Thats not a clerical error, that is coordinated election tampering.

This has RICO written all over it.

6
CuomoisaMassMurderer 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's ONE County. How much Nationwide?

Confidence cannot be restored in this election. Instead of trying to impress us with steps they've taken to secure the election, it needs to be reported (or at least considered) how easy it's been to cheat.

7
deleted 7 points ago +9 / -2
1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

With new lockdowns plus the "great reset" they can do horrific things very quickly. At that juncture our only option is to fight to the death, taking as many as possible with us. By contrast, fighting election fraud peacefully and legally is easy. And if that fails, going to war is better than waiting. Now money has no value except to fund the legal battle, and ammunition.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +1 / -7
4
45willwinagain 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is everything Trump needs to fix the process.

Trumps greatest gift to the American people will not be the SCOTUS lockup, or the sweeps in the house and the senate, or even the breaking of the corrupt media machine... it will be the restoration of faith in our elections by implementation of comprehensive election security laws that will safeguard the election process for decades to come.

Trump has utterly devastated the democrat party for the next few decades at least.

This is their undoing.

5
BewareOfThePug 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lazy buggers didnt bother to fill it in, too much resting in peace I say

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
45willwinagain 1 point ago +1 / -0

And i'm sure that now that we are past the "election" the gloves are off because they can't accuse him of interfering in an election that has already taken place.

The whole point of running Biden was so that the DOJ couldn't go after him without the media crying "hitler".

Remember how comey was a traitor for even looking into hillary's deleted emails?

Thats gone now.

They'll still cry hitler, but the cover is gone now, and trump is going to unleash hell upon all of them.

2
Balzenburg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone have one specific example we can verify that requested an absentee ballot? So far I can find many that are indeed registered but did not apply for absentee. So they are on the rolls and may have voted but don't know yet.

1
45willwinagain 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah just replied to another member about this same issue. i was going by what others in the thread have said but i didn't check myself.

thanks for the correction

2
PresidentMilo 2 points ago +2 / -0

requested and received an absentee ballot

Not quite

Here is #3321 on the list https://i.imgur.com/5l4AYpp.png

I checked #4920 and it's the same deal.

This is just a list of people who are registered. Not people who requested and received an absentee ballot.

1
45willwinagain 1 point ago +1 / -0

thanks for correction, i was just going by what others in the thread said.

bottom line is why are dead people on voter rolls? why did we see an entire screen full of people "born" on 1/1/1900 on a screen at the detroit vote count center.

whatever the fuck is going on in these states we all know there is fuckery afoot... but it is important to make sure we aren't saying shit that isn't true so thanks for the heads up.

2
Niq000 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is an example:

JANIE SMITH 1920 48204 SEPTEMBER

8
K-Harbour 8 points ago +8 / -0

This comment thread needs to be submitted to the judge. He/she needs to see how the general public sees through all this malfeasance.

7
ParticleCannon 7 points ago +7 / -0

They've overplayed the fix. Dumb bastards shot themselves in the foot to do it.

28
sad_clown 28 points ago +32 / -4

No these are not verified. They are a list of dead people so they could be checked. You have to guess their month of birth to check them.

there is a script to do that, but now I can't find it.

37
KeysToNeW 37 points ago +41 / -4 (edited)

They need to revise the title. Don't sticky that kinda phrasing. We're better.

But, did they "show up" in person?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
walls4america 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think they were there in spirit. /s The Dems held a seance to get those votes.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
12
ListenHereFat 12 points ago +12 / -0

Are you sure about that? I’m not seeing that explained anywhere else ITT

You need to guess their birth month to verify yourself, but I’m under the impression that this is a list of dead people on the voter rolls

That’s just how I’m reading this. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

20
TrumpyMadeYouGrumpy 20 points ago +22 / -2 (edited)

It's a list of dead people who have been registered to vote during their lives. This is not a list of 14k who voted THIS ELECTION. I just checked 10 of them. None voted.

OP is saying that autists should check the list. But the way he phrased it was very poor.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you sure that none voted? Or could you only find that none had requested an absentee ballot?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
sad_clown 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yes this is a list of registered dead names. It doesn't have their month so they are not verified. If you click on the twitter on the original post, one of the responses also says that. I also just posted the script that will try to guess months.

4
Doctor_McKay 4 points ago +4 / -0

I checked a bunch and came up with around 4 that voted (nearly all were registered), but I couldn't find obituaries for any of the ones that did vote.

4
reallybadmanners 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m finding Tb a lot of register voters that died 20-30 years ago. Michigan is sending ballots out unrequested to all registered voters. The fact that people that died 20 years ago are still registered is a issue. I think these are the people they send in ballots for at 4am as needed

2
Doctor_McKay 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, absolutely. Dead people should definitely be purged from the voter rolls. That they haven't been is incredibly concerning.

4
reallybadmanners 4 points ago +4 / -0

If it was recent deaths I’d understand but 20-30+ years ? Almost have to assume they were re-registered since death

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
7
TakingBackCA 7 points ago +8 / -1

Incorrect. You can find the list of dead, voted people here. They already had a bot do it. https://pastebin.com/XEi5Uy6t

7
Hattmall 7 points ago +7 / -0

Shockingly I'm searching and it seems like most of these people are actually alive, they are just old as fuck. I don't think the list is of dead people, it's just really old people that are registered voters. I'm sure that ballots were requested in bulk to nursing homes by democrats. We need to get an actual confirmed list of dead people because they don't have to be nearly this old.

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0 (edited)

You were unable to find a death certificate? Does that really mean they're alive?

-2
mush -2 points ago +1 / -3

Might be still alive. I grabbed one at random (DORA QUITTELIER, 10/1918, 49417) and found an article about her a couple of years ago: https://generationcare.org/99-and-not-slowing-down-doras-story/

-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
2
SpaceAce 2 points ago +2 / -0

I find it highly unlikely that 14,000 people live in that county who are all roughly 100 to 104 years old. That doesn't even make sense. You can't expect any rational person to believe that.

1
Hattmall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe not, but I pulled names at random and found links to them being alive. Things such as recent obituaries listing them as a survivor, or an actual article about them being 100.

Just try it. What we really need is a very recent Social Security Death index dump, then a bot can easily cross reference.

For example I found one person who is definitely dead that voted in Michigan just by looking up recent obituaries. But, that's not really widespread fraud because they just died a week or so after returning the absentee ballot which was sent out in September.

1
Balzenburg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Heres the few I found 115 years old or older;

Last Name X First Name X Year Born X Birth Month X Zip Junkune x Mark x 1905 x - x 48390 Gilchriest x Eugene x 1903 x - x 48203 Wilson x Lavina x 1901 x January x 49454 Osborn x Martin x 1901 x - x 49337 Slowikowski x Bertha x 1903 x December x 48218

All registered. None requested absentee.

2
reallybadmanners 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don’t need a script. Just fill out the info and literally check each month Jan-dec until one works. Takes 30 seconds.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
16
goodatlife123 16 points ago +16 / -0

If if ifi ifififififiififififiififif

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
7
KeysToNeW 7 points ago +11 / -4

Way less than half it's an irresponsible title we're smarter.

But...did they "show up" in person??

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
sesquipedalian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep, my posts verifying a few numbers don't show evidence were banned.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
4
Shalomtoyou 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did ballots go out to ALL REGISTERED VOTERS?

3
MemeVendor 3 points ago +3 / -0 (edited)

I looked up five names, had to guess the birth months to do so. None of them were marked as requesting an absentee ballot or sending one in. It doesn't seem conclusive that it covers in person though.

1
SpaceAce 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, it does not cover ballots cast in person. I'm sure the data exists in election records but it's not made public. Of course the server the data was on probably randomly destroyed itself.

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

If 10% of these people can be proven to have voted, that's YUGE.

1
Balzenburg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if they didn't vote it inflates the denominator # of registered votes that shows turnout. Enough of the crowd sourced cleaning on the rolls in these specific fraud areas (Detroit / Milwaukee / Philly) will expose the fraud.

3
ObjectiveReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

5/5 verifying they are registered, 0/5 that had voted. At least, none recorded in such in a way that displayed.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

there's a better post comparing absantee results in various close states, +57 biden in pa/michigan while +8 in places like ohio and arizona. fuckery is absolutely afoot. dead people aren't the only resource.

further, this logs absantee and aparently not mail in

108
TakingCoatsWIN 108 points ago +112 / -4

14,000 WTF!!!

I bet every single one voted Biden.

86
BidenCrimeFamily 86 points ago +86 / -0

Lol of course they did. Biden has the 1800s seniors on lock.

17
mintscape 17 points ago +17 / -0

I laughed so much at that I swallow my chewing gum. Well played Pepe, TOP KEK.

3
DonJr2032 3 points ago +3 / -0

I checked this and it only shows that they are registered to vote. Not that they actually voted. You also have to guess their birth month to check.

9
MakeAmericaGreat9 9 points ago +9 / -0

Literally the funniest thing I've read in a few days

13
Genericwhitemale 13 points ago +14 / -1

I’m sure they threw in a couple Trump votes for good measure

19
Wtf_socialismreally 19 points ago +19 / -0

They threw in enough Trump votes to try and have that one phrase that keeps being uttered by the left:

Plausible deniability. They'll try to ONLY find the fraudulent Trump ones that they planted guaranteed.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
Balzenburg 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. Looks very sloppy and desperate. These are not smart people. They don't understand math or data analytics. They will be exposed.

5
ADAM_SCHITT 5 points ago +5 / -0

They didn't all vote, this is just a list of registered voters. I found a few that did not vote and none that did.

5
goodatlife123 5 points ago +5 / -0

And no one else

2
Hartrw 2 points ago +3 / -1

This might not be the best of data, a lot of these people the MI website shows didn't vote, and googling the ones that did it looks like they might still be alive. ALMA GINOP, 5/1919 . I'm sure there's rampant voter fraud, but I don't think this is our best evidence. I just don't want to discredit ourselves.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
77
kratomlol 77 points ago +78 / -1

Holy shit this is insane

22
Filetsmignon 22 points ago +23 / -1 (edited)

I checked a bunch of them at random (~25). Most I couldn't find a birth month for and I didn't guess. The 4 I did find were registered but had not voted.

UPDATE: I stopped being lazy and started guessing the birth month. I got a lot of hits. Almost all the ones I tried were registered but did not request, receive or return a mail in ballot. Only 1 requested a mail in ballot but there was no date of return (I suppose they didn't return it). Also, I did not verify if these were people still alive (they'd be ~100 years old).

TL;DR: lots of registered people but I saw no returned ballots in my sample of about 25.

7
CuomoisaMassMurderer 7 points ago +7 / -0

Could you verify they had not voted? Or merely that they had not requested an absentee ballot?

7
SpaceAce 7 points ago +7 / -0

Only that they didn't vote via mail in ballot. In person voting records aren't public.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6
73
Maga2020Maga2020 73 points ago +74 / -1

The fraud is everywhere.

MSM ignoring actual evidence.

Our MSM worse than Chinese or Russian propaganda and its here in the US

22
goodatlife123 22 points ago +22 / -0

They delete reporting about the fraud as "election disinformation"

Thats yhe real evil in all of it.. one thing for them to just ignore it, but they cant let us talk about it either.... everythint is election disinfo ban ban ban ban.... trumps stop the steal facebook page got promptly deleted. Bannon was deleted of YouTube and Twitter at exactly the same time

3
elided_ego 3 points ago +3 / -0

Im pretty sure that our tech companies are just Chinese pawns at this point. This is a very dangerous time.

19
mintscape 19 points ago +19 / -0

Our MSM worse than Chinese or Russian propaganda and its here in the US

I lived in China for a while, it is remarkably close to how the Chinese do things. I believe it is organized the same way with some coordinated messaging taking place.

It is no coincidence MSM and big tech are all censoring the same things and at around the same time.

Personally I am suspecting a government intelligence agency is running the censorship, it is coordinated just like it is in China.

This is not hyperbole but it is very scary.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
CuomoisaMassMurderer 4 points ago +4 / -0

They challenge us to overthrow their power.

60
Creepy_Ginger 60 points ago +61 / -1

Seriously though, as the famous saying goes..

They are SCARED!

53
Jaybird91 53 points ago +53 / -0

Ok that cuts into the lead. Can we sue enough to fully flip?

53
Jschnizzle 53 points ago +53 / -0

Remember this is just one county, there could be thousands more in others.

15
Jaybird91 15 points ago +15 / -0

WOW

9
MAGAlikethis 9 points ago +9 / -0

Someone has done the legwork https://pastebin.com/XEi5Uy6t

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
15
mintscape 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is RAMPANT, 14k in one single county.

This is a massive and well organized voter fraud operation and it must also be done deep on the inside of the election organization. It will be some major state official running this like the state AG.

This is serious prison time for senior officials, this isn't just a small time operation.

4
TrumpyMadeYouGrumpy 4 points ago +7 / -3

It's just a list of dead people who have been registered to vote during their lives. I just checked 10 of them. None voted this election. OP posted to ask us to check the list to see if any voted.

9
Disavow_tendies 9 points ago +10 / -1

https://pastebin.com/XEi5Uy6t This is the list of dead people that actually voted.

1
EagleI 1 point ago +1 / -0

good share, thanks!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
1
FormerGraveheart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Goshdurnit.

3
Bianceziwo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Prison time? Anyone guilty of this deserves execution

3
mintscape 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is treason, so yes, you are right.

1
MetaRazz 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is across all Michigan and not all voted. This is a list of registered voters over 100 years old. It just shows that they voter rolls are not purged.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
-1
Chilopoda -1 points ago +2 / -3

No, it’s a big nothing. I checked several. None of them had voted

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

You didn't check if they had voted. You couldn't find that they had requested an absentee ballot.

1
Chilopoda 1 point ago +2 / -1

I believe it said no absentee ballot had been received. Can’t check now, the list has been taken down. Is it possible to check if they voted?

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well fuck. Now that list might offer evidence of fraud via the fact it was taken down? Plus the individuals who died then voted.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
1
Chilopoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve been with The_Donald since 2016. I recently over-shared and opened myself to trouble so I made a new account. Again.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
0
TonsOfSalt 0 points ago +1 / -1

They are registered. If my random sampling of 7 didn't get any confirmed votes though.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Confirmed votes" would mean they had requested an absentee ballot, right?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
36
anon2468 36 points ago +36 / -0

I think you all could use this in this thread. I don't know why this hasn't gotten traction yet!

Michigan Fraud/I Ran a script on ENTIRE voter registration CSV file/created and provide link to 4 small data subsets that range from potential to highly likely for fraud

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpFwf1pR/michigan-fraudi-ran-a-script-on-/

3
Whirlybot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can you cross it with all deaths in past 4 years f all people over 18 yo?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
anon2468 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't have death data. And matching by name is not easy to do. For example John Smith has a ton of results. Or what about name variations like nick vs Nicholas. Or with and without suffix like Jr or sr.

36
Creepy_Ginger 36 points ago +36 / -0

I will just pretend like I was the one to hit the updoot to number 2 while it was on the front page.

I have dreams.

17
OJ_Epstein 17 points ago +17 / -0

I got #3!!

Wow, did I just witness one of history’s epic moments?

32
SikoraP13 32 points ago +32 / -0

Has this info been forwarded to Trump campaign?

3
NoahGav 3 points ago +8 / -5

I'm sure.

7
ajcadoo 7 points ago +8 / -1

NOT GOOD ENOUGH PEDE

31
2020REBOUND 31 points ago +32 / -1

GOOD LIST to work with! But no proof they're dead?
I checked some dozens hours ago and could only verify the few ones already known (fleccas talks)

33
Shokanshi 33 points ago +34 / -1

These names are from obituaries, secondly I doubt a guy born in 1908 is voting in the General Election in the city of Detroit... but I guess his corpse is a very big Biden supporter.

-1
2020REBOUND -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yeah obviously all of them suspicious.

secondly I doubt a guy born in 1908 is voting in the General Election in the city of Detroit..

Which guy, Name?

1
Shokanshi 1 point ago +2 / -1

I can't find the original person as my browser crashes when I CTRL+F, but here is one: GENEVA,FISH,1908,49802

Edit: I searched that woman up, her obituary states she died in Kenosha (2006) but was from Upper Michigan. Maybe she also voted twice, as a ghost.

2
stickerking 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want this to be as reason as the next guy but these ballots were never cast. I just checked your Geneva Fish (December birthday) and in the bottom of the page "Your clerk has not recorded receiving your AV Application."

-7
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
16
KeysToNeW 16 points ago +19 / -3

I'm with you. This was stocked. What's with the 14k "verified"? Can we please be accurate here?

4
2020REBOUND 4 points ago +4 / -0

hehe it's motivational but yeah show this to "debunkers" and you look dumb and they don`t trust the real cases.

3
ObjectiveReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

5/5 all were registered, 0/5 displayed as having an absentee vote recorded, never bothered checking if any were dead

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-6
deleted -6 points ago +1 / -7
13
iClue 13 points ago +13 / -0

You’re right. It’s well known that Detroit, MI is the centenarian capital of the entire world. Get a grip, man

10
2020REBOUND 10 points ago +10 / -0

Not all of them are dead. I found several with newspaper articles etc. talking about their 100 years anniversaries.

But yeah many of them are fraudulent. NO DOUBT!
just not 100% proof, needs deeper investigation!

6
Inboxman 6 points ago +6 / -0

How many 100 year olds voting? My mom stopped caring about voting when she got old. She had to have her mail read to her. She didn't have her senses to know about the different initiatives or state reps.

3
2020REBOUND 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh 90%+ of them get it filled out by family and delivered.. yeah!

Very grey area with the while list!

There has to be a signature check with these ballots!!!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
12
Farage_massage 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yeah, there’s no public “dead” register, so you have to either have access to county records (calling all Cop pedes...), or google each one...

The only other “confirmed” dead voters Would be manual searches and those over 110 yrs old.

36
dontUseVinegerAsLube 36 points ago +36 / -0

I checked:

CATHERINE,KELLY,1915,48708

Month: April

and it worked:

Absentee ballot Election date 11/3/2020

Application received 10/6/2020

Ballot sent 10/6/2020

Ballot received 10/13/2020

Even found the Obituary which says age was 89 in 2004:

https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/name/catherine-kelly-obituary?pid=182910219

14
h4b1t 14 points ago +14 / -0

this is the proof we need to look for pedes. This is not 14k votes, this is a list of people we need to find the fraud

7
dontUseVinegerAsLube 7 points ago +7 / -0

Somebody used some coding to test and find the ones which requested/received ballots:

https://pastebin.com/XEi5Uy6t

Try it yourself.

For example I checked on https://mvic.sos.state.mi.us/Voter/Index/#yourclerk

Enter:

CATHERINE,KELLY,1915,48708

Month: April

and it worked:

Absentee ballot Election date 11/3/2020

Application received 10/6/2020

Ballot sent 10/6/2020

Ballot received 10/13/2020

Even found the Obituary which says age was 89 in 2004 and matches her YOB:

https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/name/catherine-kelly-obituary?pid=182910219

Here's a few I verified:

CATHERINE KELLY, 4/1915, 48708 ### VOTED! ### Ballot Received: 10/13/2020 (2 votes)

WILLIAM BRADLEY, 3/1902, 48207 ### VOTED! ### Ballot Received: 10/2/2020 (70 votes)

TERRY MATHIS, 1/1900, 48207 ### VOTED! ### Ballot Received: 11/2/2020 (564 votes)

DONNA BRYDGES, 1/1901, 49431 ### VOTED! ### Ballot Received: 9/30/2020 (1112 votes)

BRANDI KETELAAR, 7/1907, 49329 ### VOTED! ### Ballot Received: 10/26/2020 (162 votes)

3
2020REBOUND 3 points ago +3 / -0

Damn I found Catherine Kelly, alive, :( but good for her lol The obituary is in Detroit same name same age but probably different person.

668 N Pine Rd #1211, Bay City, MI 48708,

New Hope Bay Independent Living, Assisted Living & Memory Care

https://voterrecords.com/street/n+pine+rd-bay+city-mi/7 (page 7)

https://voterrecords.com/voter/71827748/catherine-kelly

NOW... that would be a good one for Project Veritas. WHAT is going on in that MEMORY care center? Did she really vote?

I did the same graphic work like you in paint. sucks but we need to keep researching these to nail down more of them. We have at least half a dozen(like: https://twitter.com/fleccas/status/1324216584219623424)

2
h4b1t 2 points ago +2 / -0

Completely agree, what we need is confirmation that ballots were received from people who died prior to the election.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1 (edited)
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
GAGASays 9 points ago +9 / -0 (edited)

Isn't the Social Security Death Index public? Or did they lock that down?

Edit: It's still available. https://www.deathindexes.com/ssdi.html

8
obviousalt 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah, I checked one and can't find a death record so far. Still VERY unlikely all these are among the living and/or voted of their own volition.

17
dontUseVinegerAsLube 17 points ago +17 / -0

I checked:

CATHERINE,KELLY,1915,48708

Month: April

and it worked:

Absentee ballot Election date 11/3/2020

Application received 10/6/2020

Ballot sent 10/6/2020

Ballot received 10/13/2020

Even found the Obituary which says age was 89 in 2004:

https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/name/catherine-kelly-obituary?pid=182910219

6
Frednut1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Checks out. Legit fraud right here. How do we save this shit before MI dems take down the website?

4
ChristopherFritz 4 points ago +5 / -1

Big question is whether there's any way to verify whether this one was counted or rejected. Just being accepted doesn't mean counted.

The existence of the ballot being accepted shows voter fraud has taken place.

But if it was rejected, then that would mean the system worked, and this is a false-positive that we don't want to waste time going after.

Then again, if they were going to catch this when counting votes, how did an absentee ballot go out in the first place? Did she sign up for absentee back before 2004? It just looks really, really bad.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
5
Frednut1 5 points ago +5 / -0

ANN,ABDOO,1918,48331 Month: May

Absentee ballot Election date 11/3/2020 Application received 6/15/2020 Ballot sent 9/24/2020 Ballot received 10/13/2020

She may still be alive: https://www.instantcheckmate.com/people/ann-abdoo/

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
27
Algotrade 27 points ago +27 / -0

WE HAVE THE BEST AUTISTS DON'T WE FOLKS.

In all seriousness, how can I get involved and help?

18
Embeyz 18 points ago +20 / -2

Its funny as I am one of those autists the left claim are triggered by 'words', we take no offense and wear the title as more of an honor, they seem to be more affected and 'triggered' than we ever would.

3
darthmatt005 3 points ago +3 / -0

Glad to hear that, friendo.

4
MAGAlikethis 4 points ago +5 / -1

Get this to the Trump campaign. https://pastebin.com/XEi5Uy6t

These are all the deceased from the list who voted.

1
Brendancs0 1 point ago +1 / -0

They can’t get rid of us without force. Make them move first and justice will back us. Just like Gandhi, the founders and the Scottish rebellion

24
MagaroniNCheese 24 points ago +24 / -0

Almonds = activated. It's like 2016 /pol/. What a time to be alive.

4
mintscape 4 points ago +4 / -0

Amazing isn't it. This election was very different to 2016 as Hunters emails were kept private but now we have all this to go at.

19
tuaris 19 points ago +19 / -0

If you ain't dead, then you didn't vote Democrat! or is it "If you didn't vote Democrat then you ain't dead"

5
tuaris 5 points ago +5 / -0

Or is it "If you didn't vote democrat then you ain't dead."

4
tuaris 4 points ago +4 / -0

hmm, looks like comments are lagging. Sorry for the weird double post.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or if you voted Democrat you're a dead man walking

19
RogueLeaderX 19 points ago +20 / -1

This election should be declared invalid and done over completely!

This election is absolutely FUBAR!

So much fraud and corruption. If this is allowed to go forward, I don't understand how the country will survive!

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
Cirruspede 7 points ago +7 / -0

Problem is it’s still a broken system, so another do-over will be much the same

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

It could be done over with no fraud.

18
WowStrongWinning 18 points ago +18 / -0

Wow crazy! Let’s get it!

17
NeuroticIntrovert 17 points ago +17 / -0

I believe this is a duplicate of this thread:

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpFtEkTK/mi-voter-fraud-investigation-con/c/

It's down to ~600 on the list who voted by absentee ballot, we need to verify deaths.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Merely finding who requested an absentee ballot isn't nearly like finding out who voted.

1
NeuroticIntrovert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Michigan gov website gives you not just requested an absentee ballot, but also when they received it, and returned it (to be counted).

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
10
Bramble 10 points ago +10 / -0

You're actually probably correct. I bet what was uncovered is a mad SS fraud scheme. People connecting SS from dead parents and keep getting the ballot.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
16
joek123 16 points ago +17 / -1

HOLY Shit, THis is yuge

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
15
dontUseVinegerAsLube 15 points ago +15 / -0

For example I checked:

CATHERINE,KELLY,1915,48708

Month: April

and it worked:

Absentee ballot Election date 11/3/2020

Application received 10/6/2020

Ballot sent 10/6/2020

Ballot received 10/13/2020

Even found the Obituary which says age was 89 in 2004:

https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/name/catherine-kelly-obituary?pid=182910219

5
freepreview 5 points ago +6 / -1

June Aiken, 1900, 49201

Month: August

Absentee Ballot received 10/08

Here's her obituary: https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/name/june-aiken-obituary?pid=191540711

Died Feb, 2019

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Sbstn 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not the same person. Obituary says : died in 2019 at age 98, meaning she was born around 1921 and not 1900.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
5
JalapenoPepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

this seems like a hit

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MuhFeelings 1 point ago +2 / -1

This needs to be at the top!

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
14
butte_weippe 14 points ago +14 / -0

Send this too don jr and and project veritas and rudy now

4
mintscape 4 points ago +4 / -0

We need some of our Youtubers to be aware of this thread.

4
DuesImperator 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tim Pool, Styxxhexenhammer, Crowder, Dave Rubin, Candace Owens, Glen Greenwald, Jimmy Dore, Steve Bannon, Papadopolis, Rush Limbaugh, Tucker Carlson, Mark Levine, Larry Elder, Hodge Twins, Karlyn Borysenko, Scott Pressler, Blair White, Michael Knowles, Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Adam Crigler, Maria Bartiromo, Judge Jenine Piro....not all “our” people (and not all “Youtubers”—but all have a platform and large audience), but all would cover it if it looked legitimate. They all care about election integrity.

3
Sbstn 3 points ago +4 / -1

No we don’t, not until we find at least one person in that list who has voted AND is dead.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
11
Krat 11 points ago +11 / -0 (edited)

No, I just tried 5 random ones and all 5 didnt even request a ballot.

For example: OTTIS,HILL,1920,48228, march

13
deleted 13 points ago +15 / -2
1
Sbstn 1 point ago +2 / -1

This.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
7
testingonetwothree 7 points ago +7 / -0

Requesting a ballot does not mean they did not vote. It means they did not vote absentee. In Michigan you can vote without an ID and theyre supposed to separate those votes but who knows if they actually did

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doesn't mean they didn't vote.

11
Bluntman 11 points ago +11 / -0

I checked a couple and both said they were registered but "Your clerk has not recorded receiving your AV Application.".

8
freepreview 8 points ago +8 / -0

yeah, I don't get how this proves they voted. They're all registered to vote, which I have no idea how voter registration works after you die, but this at least shows they didn't absentee vote.

Vote by mail? not out of the question

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not false info. The point is to submit the evidence of fraud you find.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes. It's still a batch we can help check out. We should organize and divide the labor, as well as create a database of results. If this batch isn't good hunting grounds, maybe we can find something better.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Semantics and infighting aren't what we need now. Apparently 3,000 were found from this batch. I doubt that was an exhaustive search; who knows how many more went wrong in this one way, in this one County?

It's still evidence. Every bit helps. We need to convince Judges.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
latic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Im the same so far.

3
Bunny 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same, I saw that twice and one that was absentee requested but never received (which makes sense considering the guy died last week - Richard Walker, Sept 1919, 49008)

1
mintscape 1 point ago +1 / -0

Didn't all registered voters get a ballot automatically?

4
Bluntman 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not sure my dude, just going off what I saw which is dead people are registered but there's no indication they voted.

This does not mean that they did or did not receive a ballot or had voted while dead.

Also relies on accurate reporting from who is sending and receiving those ballots so yeah.... who knows.

Why people that are dead are still registered to vote is beyond me tho.

2
mintscape 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not sure either, I am not sure how these no request ballots worked. Absentee is far safer of course and fully tracked but I wonder if these special covid no request ones are?

I can understand perhaps people that died in 2019 still being on the rolls but people that died in the 1800s? Very strange.

4
DuesImperator 4 points ago +4 / -0

I thought that was what the “mass mail ballots” was about. Unlike Absentee ballots, people didn’t have to request them, they were sent out to everyone on the voter rolls.
And just because a lot didn’t send in a mail ballot, doesn’t mean a poll worker didn’t just down the list after they closed the polls and fill out a ballot on behalf of anyone on the list that didn’t vote by mail or in person. They just a names on the rolls to justify the number of ballots. 500 dead people still on the list? Opportunity to fill out 500 ballots for those “people” in the back room. Scan them, mix them in with valid ballots.....how would anyone know?

11
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaab 11 points ago +13 / -2

Holy fucking shit

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
11
Ronald_RayGun 11 points ago +11 / -0

Looks like Someone made a bot that checked them all and returned their statuses: https://pastebin.com/XEi5Uy6t

5
JalapenoPepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

I believe the original list was generated based off of registered voters over the age of 100 (dead AND alive). Anyone on this truncated list which has the "ballot received" status would have to be verified as dead via other means to show a fraudulent vote. The oldest living person in the US is 115 yo, so for anyone on this list born before 1905, you can assume they are dead. There are 3 people that meet that criterion. The remaining would need some investigative work, online obituaries and whatnot.

4
mahler5 4 points ago +5 / -1

As of the last census, 1729 Michigan residents were over 100 years old. I don't know how the number has changed since them, but it likely has increased.

This curated list only has 1362 names on it. That means it's within the realm of possibility that it's legit.

1
jnathan2010 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tweet mentions that the list is only for one county in Michigan though. Detroit so main population but still...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
10
TarHeelMAGA 10 points ago +10 / -0

If the courts do not straighten this blatant stealing of the election, then we have lost the country....UNLESS WE NUT THE FUCK UP AND STOP THEM! #MAGA

10
BidenCrimeFamily 10 points ago +10 / -0

OF ONE COUNTY!

9
Wtf_socialismreally 9 points ago +9 / -0

Holy shit though that is a NOTABLE amount of dead people.

8
UndocumentedUpvote 8 points ago +8 / -0

I checked 4 names, none of them voted. This is not a list of people who voted, but registered voters.

3
DuesImperator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well it says they didn’t vote by mail. It doesn’t mean someone didn’t fill out a ballot, scan it and mix it in with the others after seeing their name on the active voter roll list.

“Hmmmm Mark Smith is on my list, and he didn’t vote by mail or in person. Let me just quickly fill out a ballot for him and cross his name off the list. There we go.....500 people on my list (dead and alive), 500 ballots in my bin.”

~cheating Dem poll worker

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

You did not check if they voted or not. You checked if they had requested an absentee ballot. That ;leaves plenty of stones unturned.

8
kneauxp 8 points ago +9 / -1

Tried one at random, dead and shows they voted...

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/207374179/estelle-ann-fausold

First: ESTELLE Last: FAUSOLD BirthYear: 1915 Zip: 48236

1
Tylem_syk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Month?

2
kneauxp 2 points ago +2 / -0

November

1
Sbstn 1 point ago +2 / -1

No she didn’t vote : Your clerk has not recorded receiving your AV Application.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which does not mean she didn't vote. It just means she didn't request an absentee ballot. Lots of other ways for her dead name to have been used to vote.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0 (edited)
4
tyrannyusuallywins 4 points ago +5 / -1

Agreed,

For instance one such vote was "Harry Whiteley", in which a vote is recoreded and the person is dead. However the ballot was indeed cast prior to their death.

https://www.beckfuneralhome.org/funeral-obituary/harry-hoeft-whiteley/

I will continue to comb but I believe this just may be a list to help us narrow them down, not necessarily a list of absolutes.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

You didn't determine they had not voted, only that they hadn't requested an absentee ballot.

6
Diotima 6 points ago +6 / -0

I checked a few names and none of them have a received AV ballot... don't think the tweet is accurate and im to tired to check more... don't get me wrong I only checked about 6 different names chosen at random so there could be a bunch here with fraudulent votes.

6
Bramble 6 points ago +6 / -0

I tried a random name. They are registered, but did not submit a ballot it seems.

Either the list is just a list of registered dead voters or MI is cleaning up after themselves.

1
EagleI 1 point ago +1 / -0

I posted this and comment was deported. Had another user DM to say the same. What gives?

6
Thrice 6 points ago +6 / -0

They just nuked the guy who found the information from Twitter

HMM

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
MAGAlikethis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Master death index.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sounds like something a Butler would say: "oh Master death index ..." Lol

5
adam_schiff 5 points ago +5 / -0

We need to make a shared document and enter the birth month for each of these.

5
givethismanacoat 5 points ago +5 / -0

I am sorry I can’t read it. It is dangerous.

“Pastebin’s SMART filters have detected potentially offensive or questionable content ahead. The content you are about to view has been deemed potentially offensive or questionable by our filters, because of this, you’re receiving this warning. You can continue ahead at your own risk or go back.”

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
itbj2 5 points ago +5 / -0

They suspended the account of the guy that was looking it up.

4
sharthappens 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are you supposed to guess their birth month?

3
pelt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes you have to guess that part.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
first_amendment 1 point ago +1 / -0

try http://familysearch.org , a free geneology site. You can search by name, location, dob, etc, etc. I been using it to get social security death indexes with hopes to build a program if a michigan foia went through (so I wouldn't have to access their website every 4 seconds for a month-anything faster than 4 seconds could signal a ddoc attack). But it appears someone is way ahead of me in terms of data collection and processing.

1
2020REBOUND 1 point ago +1 / -0

you just go through the months in drop down menu, easy.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
butte_weippe 4 points ago +4 / -0

can someone verify

4
NoahGav 4 points ago +4 / -0

I tried to verify this, but you need to enter their birth month and that information isn't available in the pastebin?

3
_Throwgali_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

You have to guess it but the site only shows that they're registered not that they voted, unless I'm missing something

2
EagleI 2 points ago +2 / -0

Check right hand side where it says absentee ballot. However, it wouldn't account for if someone claimed to be them in person, of course.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nor would it show if they mailed by mail in ballot instead of absentee.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
Sbstn 1 point ago +3 / -2

She didn’t vote

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
3
letrain 3 points ago +3 / -0

14+ thousand....holy fuck. That should alarm everyone. Not just trump supporters....

2
Sbstn 2 points ago +3 / -1

It’s just a list of centenarians (dead or not), so far most didn’t vote and the very few who did are not proven dead. We need to find one match to file a complaint

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are giving incorrect info.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3