8202
Comments (1050)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
232
KeysToNeW 232 points ago +235 / -3

Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa....the geniuses have VERIFIED, on the government website, that FOURTEEN THOUSAND DEAD PEOPLE, IN A SINGLE COUNTY, voted three days ago?

Hol' up. BS. They're registered. Here's the real question. Did they show up to vote in person??????

135
deleted 135 points ago +137 / -2
66
Ladybug87 66 points ago +66 / -0

They need to check this for each state. Pam Bondi and the Trump team have found thousands in NV either dead or that have moved out (checked against change of address registries) and now this in Michigan. Georgia and Pennsylvania at least, because it's going to be close.

39
deleted 39 points ago +39 / -0
16
TonsOfSalt 16 points ago +17 / -1

I tried it on 7 of them at random. They were all registered, but none had voted.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
Sbstn -2 points ago +1 / -3

You need to prove they're actually dead though

14
DaayTerkErJerbs 14 points ago +14 / -0

They cheated everywhere NV, AZ, WI, MI, PA, GA, NC, MN, TX

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's almost 20% of States, but not "everywhere." I bet they cheated in the other 80% of States

2
Balzenburg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Milwaukee will be the biggest offender. Look at their turnout with Biden getting better numbers than Obama in 2008.

Turnout is said to be 5.5 standard deviations from the norm. Although this was a different year with mail in vote that is an insane number.

17
45willwinagain 17 points ago +17 / -0

But it's 14k in one single county alone... 14,000 dead people requested and received an absentee ballot.

Thats not a clerical error, that is coordinated election tampering.

This has RICO written all over it.

6
CuomoisaMassMurderer 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's ONE County. How much Nationwide?

Confidence cannot be restored in this election. Instead of trying to impress us with steps they've taken to secure the election, it needs to be reported (or at least considered) how easy it's been to cheat.

7
deleted 7 points ago +9 / -2
4
45willwinagain 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is everything Trump needs to fix the process.

Trumps greatest gift to the American people will not be the SCOTUS lockup, or the sweeps in the house and the senate, or even the breaking of the corrupt media machine... it will be the restoration of faith in our elections by implementation of comprehensive election security laws that will safeguard the election process for decades to come.

Trump has utterly devastated the democrat party for the next few decades at least.

This is their undoing.

5
BewareOfThePug 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lazy buggers didnt bother to fill it in, too much resting in peace I say

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
45willwinagain 1 point ago +1 / -0

And i'm sure that now that we are past the "election" the gloves are off because they can't accuse him of interfering in an election that has already taken place.

The whole point of running Biden was so that the DOJ couldn't go after him without the media crying "hitler".

Remember how comey was a traitor for even looking into hillary's deleted emails?

Thats gone now.

They'll still cry hitler, but the cover is gone now, and trump is going to unleash hell upon all of them.

2
Balzenburg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone have one specific example we can verify that requested an absentee ballot? So far I can find many that are indeed registered but did not apply for absentee. So they are on the rolls and may have voted but don't know yet.

1
45willwinagain 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah just replied to another member about this same issue. i was going by what others in the thread have said but i didn't check myself.

thanks for the correction

2
PresidentMilo 2 points ago +2 / -0

requested and received an absentee ballot

Not quite

Here is #3321 on the list https://i.imgur.com/5l4AYpp.png

I checked #4920 and it's the same deal.

This is just a list of people who are registered. Not people who requested and received an absentee ballot.

1
45willwinagain 1 point ago +1 / -0

thanks for correction, i was just going by what others in the thread said.

bottom line is why are dead people on voter rolls? why did we see an entire screen full of people "born" on 1/1/1900 on a screen at the detroit vote count center.

whatever the fuck is going on in these states we all know there is fuckery afoot... but it is important to make sure we aren't saying shit that isn't true so thanks for the heads up.

8
K-Harbour 8 points ago +8 / -0

This comment thread needs to be submitted to the judge. He/she needs to see how the general public sees through all this malfeasance.

7
ParticleCannon 7 points ago +7 / -0

They've overplayed the fix. Dumb bastards shot themselves in the foot to do it.

28
sad_clown 28 points ago +32 / -4

No these are not verified. They are a list of dead people so they could be checked. You have to guess their month of birth to check them.

there is a script to do that, but now I can't find it.

37
KeysToNeW 37 points ago +41 / -4

They need to revise the title. Don't sticky that kinda phrasing. We're better.

But, did they "show up" in person?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
walls4america 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think they were there in spirit. /s The Dems held a seance to get those votes.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
12
ListenHereFat 12 points ago +12 / -0

Are you sure about that? I’m not seeing that explained anywhere else ITT

You need to guess their birth month to verify yourself, but I’m under the impression that this is a list of dead people on the voter rolls

That’s just how I’m reading this. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

20
TrumpyMadeYouGrumpy 20 points ago +22 / -2

It's a list of dead people who have been registered to vote during their lives. This is not a list of 14k who voted THIS ELECTION. I just checked 10 of them. None voted.

OP is saying that autists should check the list. But the way he phrased it was very poor.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you sure that none voted? Or could you only find that none had requested an absentee ballot?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
sad_clown 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yes this is a list of registered dead names. It doesn't have their month so they are not verified. If you click on the twitter on the original post, one of the responses also says that. I also just posted the script that will try to guess months.

4
Doctor_McKay 4 points ago +4 / -0

I checked a bunch and came up with around 4 that voted (nearly all were registered), but I couldn't find obituaries for any of the ones that did vote.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
7
TakingBackCA 7 points ago +8 / -1

Incorrect. You can find the list of dead, voted people here. They already had a bot do it. https://pastebin.com/XEi5Uy6t

7
Hattmall 7 points ago +7 / -0

Shockingly I'm searching and it seems like most of these people are actually alive, they are just old as fuck. I don't think the list is of dead people, it's just really old people that are registered voters. I'm sure that ballots were requested in bulk to nursing homes by democrats. We need to get an actual confirmed list of dead people because they don't have to be nearly this old.

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

You were unable to find a death certificate? Does that really mean they're alive?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Balzenburg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Heres the few I found 115 years old or older;

Last Name X First Name X Year Born X Birth Month X Zip Junkune x Mark x 1905 x - x 48390 Gilchriest x Eugene x 1903 x - x 48203 Wilson x Lavina x 1901 x January x 49454 Osborn x Martin x 1901 x - x 49337 Slowikowski x Bertha x 1903 x December x 48218

All registered. None requested absentee.

2
reallybadmanners 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don’t need a script. Just fill out the info and literally check each month Jan-dec until one works. Takes 30 seconds.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
16
goodatlife123 16 points ago +16 / -0

If if ifi ifififififiififififiififif

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
7
KeysToNeW 7 points ago +11 / -4

Way less than half it's an irresponsible title we're smarter.

But...did they "show up" in person??

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
sesquipedalian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep, my posts verifying a few numbers don't show evidence were banned.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
4
Shalomtoyou 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did ballots go out to ALL REGISTERED VOTERS?

3
MemeVendor 3 points ago +3 / -0

I looked up five names, had to guess the birth months to do so. None of them were marked as requesting an absentee ballot or sending one in. It doesn't seem conclusive that it covers in person though.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

If 10% of these people can be proven to have voted, that's YUGE.

1
Balzenburg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if they didn't vote it inflates the denominator # of registered votes that shows turnout. Enough of the crowd sourced cleaning on the rolls in these specific fraud areas (Detroit / Milwaukee / Philly) will expose the fraud.

3
ObjectiveReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

5/5 verifying they are registered, 0/5 that had voted. At least, none recorded in such in a way that displayed.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

there's a better post comparing absantee results in various close states, +57 biden in pa/michigan while +8 in places like ohio and arizona. fuckery is absolutely afoot. dead people aren't the only resource.

further, this logs absantee and aparently not mail in