Yes. It's still a batch we can help check out. We should organize and divide the labor, as well as create a database of results. If this batch isn't good hunting grounds, maybe we can find something better.
Semantics and infighting aren't what we need now. Apparently 3,000 were found from this batch. I doubt that was an exhaustive search; who knows how many more went wrong in this one way, in this one County?
It's still evidence. Every bit helps. We need to convince Judges.
It was repeating a tweet. It was a data dump to search.
Yes, people here are edgy, trigger happy, and knee-jerking. It's understandable. Still, if 3,000 were found out of 14,000 to search, and that search was prematurely cut off, that's still over 20%. Very substantial, and include the part that it's not complete.
I'll agree the title / OP could have been re-worded. The facts did come out in discussion.
Yes. It's still a batch we can help check out. We should organize and divide the labor, as well as create a database of results. If this batch isn't good hunting grounds, maybe we can find something better.
Semantics and infighting aren't what we need now. Apparently 3,000 were found from this batch. I doubt that was an exhaustive search; who knows how many more went wrong in this one way, in this one County?
It's still evidence. Every bit helps. We need to convince Judges.
It was repeating a tweet. It was a data dump to search.
Yes, people here are edgy, trigger happy, and knee-jerking. It's understandable. Still, if 3,000 were found out of 14,000 to search, and that search was prematurely cut off, that's still over 20%. Very substantial, and include the part that it's not complete.
I'll agree the title / OP could have been re-worded. The facts did come out in discussion.