Semantics and infighting aren't what we need now. Apparently 3,000 were found from this batch. I doubt that was an exhaustive search; who knows how many more went wrong in this one way, in this one County?
It's still evidence. Every bit helps. We need to convince Judges.
It was repeating a tweet. It was a data dump to search.
Yes, people here are edgy, trigger happy, and knee-jerking. It's understandable. Still, if 3,000 were found out of 14,000 to search, and that search was prematurely cut off, that's still over 20%. Very substantial, and include the part that it's not complete.
I'll agree the title / OP could have been re-worded. The facts did come out in discussion.
Semantics and infighting aren't what we need now. Apparently 3,000 were found from this batch. I doubt that was an exhaustive search; who knows how many more went wrong in this one way, in this one County?
It's still evidence. Every bit helps. We need to convince Judges.
It was repeating a tweet. It was a data dump to search.
Yes, people here are edgy, trigger happy, and knee-jerking. It's understandable. Still, if 3,000 were found out of 14,000 to search, and that search was prematurely cut off, that's still over 20%. Very substantial, and include the part that it's not complete.
I'll agree the title / OP could have been re-worded. The facts did come out in discussion.