52 added up the votes in GA and noticed a large amount of votes that ignored the other races (media.patriots.win) posted 161 days ago by resist 161 days ago by resist +52 / -0 5 comments share 5 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (5) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 1 ▼ – TrumpSteak2 1 point 161 days ago +1 / -0 Didn't see Doug Collins was ahead. That's good news. I like that guy. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – resist [S] 1 point 161 days ago +1 / -0 sorry if it's hard to see, but there's a green line separating the senate seats (same for the house districts) Collins performed well but it seems there will be a runoff between Loeffler / Warnock for that seat permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – TrumpSteak2 1 point 161 days ago +1 / -0 Bummer. Maybe once the fraud is parsed it'll shift. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – VinceVonVroom 1 point 161 days ago +1 / -0 It's interesting, though - I went back and compared the 2016 Georgia presidential race to the Senate race. Trump ran 45K votes shy of the R Senate candidate, Hillary was a whopping 280K ahead of the D Senate candidate. Weird numbers for sure! permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – JustHereForTheSalmon 1 point 161 days ago +1 / -0 Because filling all the ovals takes more time and paid off people. permalink save report block reply
Didn't see Doug Collins was ahead. That's good news. I like that guy.
sorry if it's hard to see, but there's a green line separating the senate seats (same for the house districts) Collins performed well but it seems there will be a runoff between Loeffler / Warnock for that seat
Bummer. Maybe once the fraud is parsed it'll shift.
It's interesting, though - I went back and compared the 2016 Georgia presidential race to the Senate race.
Trump ran 45K votes shy of the R Senate candidate, Hillary was a whopping 280K ahead of the D Senate candidate.
Weird numbers for sure!
Because filling all the ovals takes more time and paid off people.