DNC operatives were posted up outside PA polling places counting in person votes to know how many fraudulent votes they needed to produce!!!
"My poll was visited by one such spy. He sat outside the poll all day long with a laptop. It was obvious what he was doing: counting in-person voters. Why? To divine how many mail-in ballots would be required to beat the in-person votes for President Trump that would be tallied first."
This isn't bad or illegal, this is turnout operations, which is much different than nefarious election activites. In fact this is part of how every local precinct should be run so you know whom your neighbors are, and no one whom doesn't live there can vote in that precinct. It's one of the most basic and fundamental checks on election fraud; which is why Dems do away with small election sites, go to universal (any polling location) models, and move to either mail or mega-centers with fewer polling places (or early voting locations where no one is able to verifiy if another voter lives there and is eligible or ineligible or not).
This shifts the burden of verification from the citizen doing their civic duty to the "gov official" as the primary one. This is bad (same problem with Voter ID it shifts the burden and rights).
This is like understanding that most crimes are detected by the public, not law enforcement officiers. It's the publics job to do these things to have a well functioning government with the most individual/societal freedoms.
Did you read the article? I get what you're saying but in this case it's not what you're talking about. They were from outside the district and tried gaining access to the polling place but were removed. One sat outside the polling place with a laptop counting people, more than likely feeding those numbers to someone letting them know how many fraudulent votes they could make. They weren't on the level especially when we've been seeing all the fuckery going on with them.
Yes, but there's no "devining" the motives behind the actions described. A legit campaign (particularly any excellent local campaign) will have these election turnout poll watchers, and they count the foot traffic (ideally they are local so they can identify who is coming like if they are supporters or opponents) AND as well as keep track of the voter signature lists where the updates for Who's voted every hour. This way they or someone else at campaign HQ or the local candidate can call people and get them out to vote.
Nowdays with laptops and stuff (especially in a Presidental Election Year) it's not uncommon to have hired in someone to do this job; particularly in key locations which might devine data trends. For instance my election location carries excellent modeling of data, and by seeing how this precinct turns out on an election predicts very well for the whole big area. So a campaign might pay attn to some districts/locations more than another depending on the turnout models they are trying to capture.
As far as trying to get access to the polling place, again this is good practice for someone to be able to "look into" the general area of a polling place to make sure the poll workers and basic procedures are being practiced (like signage, seals on boxes, or if the workers haven't updated the lists in awhile).
Part of the problem is with (from the article)
They were posing as poll watchers. In Pennsylvania, certified poll watchers can only work in the county of their residence.
See there shouldn't be such a thing as "a certified poll watcher" or a restriction upon the residency. Any American citizen should be able to do these things, so long as they are not interfering with the voting process or Election Integrity. These two restrictions of certification and residency promote the REMOVAL of this critical oversight function. And as the article wrote, those who break the Laws will break them no matter what (like gun control laws), and those who are law abiding means now the criminals can run their operations unwatched.
DNC operatives were posted up outside PA polling places counting in person votes to know how many fraudulent votes they needed to produce!!!
"My poll was visited by one such spy. He sat outside the poll all day long with a laptop. It was obvious what he was doing: counting in-person voters. Why? To divine how many mail-in ballots would be required to beat the in-person votes for President Trump that would be tallied first."
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/stealing_pennsylvania.html
Redpills they don't teach apparently anymore:
This isn't bad or illegal, this is turnout operations, which is much different than nefarious election activites. In fact this is part of how every local precinct should be run so you know whom your neighbors are, and no one whom doesn't live there can vote in that precinct. It's one of the most basic and fundamental checks on election fraud; which is why Dems do away with small election sites, go to universal (any polling location) models, and move to either mail or mega-centers with fewer polling places (or early voting locations where no one is able to verifiy if another voter lives there and is eligible or ineligible or not).
This shifts the burden of verification from the citizen doing their civic duty to the "gov official" as the primary one. This is bad (same problem with Voter ID it shifts the burden and rights).
This is like understanding that most crimes are detected by the public, not law enforcement officiers. It's the publics job to do these things to have a well functioning government with the most individual/societal freedoms.
MAGA On!
Hmm never thought of it that way. Good point well made!
Did you read the article? I get what you're saying but in this case it's not what you're talking about. They were from outside the district and tried gaining access to the polling place but were removed. One sat outside the polling place with a laptop counting people, more than likely feeding those numbers to someone letting them know how many fraudulent votes they could make. They weren't on the level especially when we've been seeing all the fuckery going on with them.
Yes, but there's no "devining" the motives behind the actions described. A legit campaign (particularly any excellent local campaign) will have these election turnout poll watchers, and they count the foot traffic (ideally they are local so they can identify who is coming like if they are supporters or opponents) AND as well as keep track of the voter signature lists where the updates for Who's voted every hour. This way they or someone else at campaign HQ or the local candidate can call people and get them out to vote.
Nowdays with laptops and stuff (especially in a Presidental Election Year) it's not uncommon to have hired in someone to do this job; particularly in key locations which might devine data trends. For instance my election location carries excellent modeling of data, and by seeing how this precinct turns out on an election predicts very well for the whole big area. So a campaign might pay attn to some districts/locations more than another depending on the turnout models they are trying to capture.
As far as trying to get access to the polling place, again this is good practice for someone to be able to "look into" the general area of a polling place to make sure the poll workers and basic procedures are being practiced (like signage, seals on boxes, or if the workers haven't updated the lists in awhile).
Part of the problem is with (from the article)
See there shouldn't be such a thing as "a certified poll watcher" or a restriction upon the residency. Any American citizen should be able to do these things, so long as they are not interfering with the voting process or Election Integrity. These two restrictions of certification and residency promote the REMOVAL of this critical oversight function. And as the article wrote, those who break the Laws will break them no matter what (like gun control laws), and those who are law abiding means now the criminals can run their operations unwatched.