I appreciate all the work people here are doing to point out the irregularities. However, because the cheating is so obvious, the cognitive dissonance is probably and ironically stronger. The only effective way to get through that is to find a person to blame. The "dems" won't do it. The good news is we don't know how to find all of them, just one will probably be enough to break the spell.
Has anyone found who is filling these harvested ballots out? With modern tech it only takes a handful of people, but without finding a specific person to pin it on, I don't see either side ever conceding. I know which side I will fight on in a civil war, but I really hope it doesn't come to that.
I deal with lawyers often unfortunately. They are far more "people-people" than "number-people" or even "things-people". The "best" are the ones that read people and can pick them apart. I doubt there exists a significant amount of prominent lawyers or judges that understand any of the technical fraud arguments being made here. That's why any proof must lead to a person if the play is to win in court.
You misunderstand. The courts are not properly setup to process a claim of a crime without a specific alleged perpetrator. Just look at civil forfeiture where technically money is accused of committing the crime of being illegal. Furthermore, the court battles have barely begun. Anything out there yet is just a plea for an emergency injunction, which would not evaluate any technical evaluations.
I know you are probably just here to get a rise, may even be a bot. If Biden wins I'm in all the scapegoat tribal categories of the regressives so I might as well go down fighting.
I appreciate all the work people here are doing to point out the irregularities. However, because the cheating is so obvious, the cognitive dissonance is probably and ironically stronger. The only effective way to get through that is to find a person to blame. The "dems" won't do it. The good news is we don't know how to find all of them, just one will probably be enough to break the spell.
Has anyone found who is filling these harvested ballots out? With modern tech it only takes a handful of people, but without finding a specific person to pin it on, I don't see either side ever conceding. I know which side I will fight on in a civil war, but I really hope it doesn't come to that.
I'd rather not. More important shit to do.
I think we both have more important things to do.
I deal with lawyers often unfortunately. They are far more "people-people" than "number-people" or even "things-people". The "best" are the ones that read people and can pick them apart. I doubt there exists a significant amount of prominent lawyers or judges that understand any of the technical fraud arguments being made here. That's why any proof must lead to a person if the play is to win in court.
You misunderstand. The courts are not properly setup to process a claim of a crime without a specific alleged perpetrator. Just look at civil forfeiture where technically money is accused of committing the crime of being illegal. Furthermore, the court battles have barely begun. Anything out there yet is just a plea for an emergency injunction, which would not evaluate any technical evaluations.
I know you are probably just here to get a rise, may even be a bot. If Biden wins I'm in all the scapegoat tribal categories of the regressives so I might as well go down fighting.