I'm in the blockchain business. I didn't really look at the patent carefully but I suspect this is more less a distributed way to store records of unique signature that were added to watermark so they can verify the blockchain (master record) the hash information written on it. I actually worked on USPS automation system for a few years as well. I wrote software to scan zip codes to direc tthem in certain lanes, and checking whether a box has a lid and send to a lidder or skip lidding. I'm guessing the USPS could mandate that all mail-in-ballot goes through a specific watermark machines. This would be brilliant and support the theory.
People are familiar enough with the concept of Bitcoin to get through the idea of using blockchain. QFS for voting however is going to be dicey.
I'm in the blockchain business. I didn't really look at the patent carefully but I suspect this is more less a distributed way to store records of unique signature that were added to watermark so they can verify the blockchain (master record) the hash information written on it. I actually worked on USPS automation system for a few years as well. I wrote software to scan zip codes to direc tthem in certain lanes, and checking whether a box has a lid and send to a lidder or skip lidding. I'm guessing the USPS could mandate that all mail-in-ballot goes through a specific watermark machines. This would be brilliant and support the theory.
Can you explain better how the embedded isotopes work with respect to the QFS blockchain?