31
posted ago by waxonwaxoff87 ago by waxonwaxoff87 +31 / -0

Saw video on info wars and have read that Trump set up sting with blockchain coded watermarks on legit ballots. Some have said executive order gave DHS authority over election security. Can anyone speak on this? Rumor mongering or truth? I know Trump has dealt with Democratic politics most of his career until he decided to flip the political table. I would think he and Giuliani (a New York mayor) are quite familiar in election fuckery.

Comments (26)
sorted by:
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
shadypollster 4 points ago +4 / -0

That is another possibility, an intimidation tactic perhaps.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
K-Harbour 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lincoln 1864 approved two to life sentences for mail-in vote fraud scheme.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
shadypollster 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think that it is an attempt to build up hope and then crush it.

I do not believe it, but if it turns out to be true I will get a Trump tattoo.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
K-Harbour 5 points ago +5 / -0

What Say? I say this is the plan:

  1. Team Trump sues
  2. DHS provides damning evidence
  3. Barr/DOJ join in to assert civil rights violations

It is wrong to disenfranchise big city minorities by stuffing their ballot boxes.

3
Alphahorizon 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZdWbQdcEqkV1/

I say it sounds somewhat credible. If it is, we should see something in the coming days as it relates to initial arrests. Unless suppressed. But I am not following MSM on any levels any more to include Fox. And have found alternative sites to be much better on just...reporting

1
Treintrientje 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the push to letting the media call out the winner/ letting Biden suggest he won/ is to let Trump concede before the actual vote count has been signed off by the officials. See if they can let him drop the hammer too fast. If he accuses them of vote fraud before the official numbers are turned in it will be hard to get anyone convicted except for trying to be fraudulent with votes.

I'm from the Netherlands and our vote numbers have to be written down in an official Proces Verbaal (government statement under oath). I guess the USA has somewhat the same system where someone has to sign off for the numbers per district and the national total? That's the moment I'm expecting Trump to strike if this idea is true.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
eagle123 3 points ago +4 / -1

https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/news/10346-ballots-are-secure-knowledge-on-vote-by-mail-is

"Ballots, like money, are printed on special fraud-resistant paper, with particular size, thickness, weight, texture, color, and formats made to exact specifications. Furthermore, the paper is impressed with unique identifiers, such as watermarks, that certify it as an official ballot."

2
waxonwaxoff87 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Question would be a simple smiley face for example vs a unique watermark code that would give you a digital chain of custody. Ie did this ballot really come from this specific. precinct/county/voter

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
JustTheNews 2 points ago +2 / -0

larp

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
waxonwaxoff87 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve only posted once. And it was for clarification. If I posted out definite that would be falling for it. Calm your tits.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
waxonwaxoff87 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Welcome to an active forum.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
hot_covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

For what it's worth, the preacher interviewed in this video earlier today says he has a source that has confirmed the watermark story. As far as I know, this guy Mario Murillo is as straight as they come- not sensationalist, no scandals, been around a long time. I don't see why he would lie about something like that or even bring it up. So there is this anyway:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mc6qsI5bYts

(This is definitely a Christian video, so if you don't like that, don't watch. But Christian pedes, be encouraged, keep praying. God has this!)

1
anenzymaticboom 1 point ago +1 / -0

I give it an "ehh..."

As most things Steve Pieczenik talks about on Alex Jones. Now perhaps Steve Pieczenik is on way more frequently than I remember from back when InfoWars was on YT, but as of late whenever I listen to InfoWars, which is like once or twice a month, Steve Pieczenik is on dropping some interesting things to think about.

When I think back on other things Steve Pieczenik has talked about I often think at the time, NFW, but interesting to ponder, then a few weeks later, he often is a little more right then wrong. Like, it did not turn out exactly like he said but, he is a hell of a lot closer than what the common thought was at the time. I believe, he said back when the cruise ships were getting infected with covid, which is when the normies were first hearing about it and when most of us had already stocked up, Steve said that covid did escape from a lab, but that it was no big deal and that most people would survive it just fine, I think he even said he had gotten it back in like Nov 2019...

2
waxonwaxoff87 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems weird to make up talking to a DHS friend and talking about a specific operation. Would blow credibility to be so certain. But I don't know what motivates some people. He is a guy that worked in intelligence so hes not a complete rando. Ill be hopefully optimistic as I do trust that Trump has some sort of ammo in these court proceedings.

0
totesnotabot 0 points ago +1 / -1

Pure LARPery.