920
Comments (33)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
cyber_acolyte 8 points ago +8 / -0

True. It’s near impossible to create the kind of infrastructure needed to launch an app like Twitter without significant investment. The running costs would be sky high too.

7
Wyopepe 7 points ago +7 / -0

Capex vs opex.

Most apps are going to utilize the pay as you go model, which has the benefit of scale without the initial investment costs of capex.

The only problem is, the metal isn’t really yours so the control aspect is gone.

Tough spot for new platforms to be in, especially conservative media sites.

5
remember1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

We’ll just construct our own buildings full of server farms. With blackjack. And hookers!

0
cyber_acolyte 0 points ago +1 / -1

Whoever hosts has the power. Not sure how successful the payg model will be.

4
Wyopepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

That’s essentially what I mean by pay as you go.

That’s how Azure and AWS operate for the most part.

Spin up servers, pay for the per minute use, etc.

They can still yank that service if they deem it to violate some terms.

Giving up a lot of freedom for convenience. In a perfect world that’s okay, but in Wokanda, no guarantees.

2
cyber_acolyte 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh I see sorry I thought you meant for the everyday end user not the app developers. Of course cpu/storage/bandwidth. Got ya.

2
fatemaspanky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Andrew Torba is the only one that is completely independent from big tech. That's where you need to put your time and energy into.

1
RedStapler 1 point ago +1 / -0

It has been done on Gab.com