17
posted ago by JustHereForTheSalmon ago by JustHereForTheSalmon +17 / -0

Yes, they're supposed to copy ballots over. This is supposed to happen under close watch of observers that represent both sides, to make sure the transcription is accurate to the original ballot. When they fuck up, a ballot gets challenged and set aside for further review and manual entry.

Who are the types of people attracted to these jobs? We're talking temps, the kind of people that don't already have a 9-5. Young people with heads full of mush. The very kinds of people motivated to bring socialism and ruin the the United States.

When observers are kicked out, or the China Virus is being used excuse to keep observers so far away that they can't see the original and the copy, they're free to fill out the "copies" any way they want. We have no way to know the replacements are being copied accurately. Consider that people like this are the kinds of people filling these things out.

If he could get away with it, he'd count them all for his candidate.

Comments (4)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
Crudzilla 4 points ago +4 / -0

I thought if the machine doesn't read it then you're shit out of luck? That why the sharpie thing was such a big deal.

If this system of reading out 'unclear' ballots in pairs and just making up brand new ballots to 'replace' them is standard operating procedure in America your elections are a complete joke.

Nothing would stop the dude from reading out whatever he fancies. Or if one dem poll counter could change the votes, I don't think its a massive stretch to imagine that two dem poll counters could change votes together.

Or what's stopping the guy reading getting to the end of the pile and just starting over on the same pile again?

NO NEW BALLOTS SHOULD BE BEING GENERATED WITHIN A COUNTING STATION UNDER ANY FUCKING CIRCUMSTANCES?!

As a UK pede this looks like really banana republic shit.