41
posted ago by DuesImperator ago by DuesImperator +41 / -0

Has an election EVER had multiple States that haven’t been called almost 3 days after the election? And a winner not declared almost 3 days after an election?

Hasn’t it always been that people vote, the polls close and then late that night, or early into the next morning a winner is declared?

Comments (8)
sorted by:
6
CameraWheels 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is the only one they failed.

4
eyerighteye 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's been the way i remember it.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Tex1oco 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is mostly a first though 2000 did take to December 12th, due to Florida being contested - multiple recounts, finally the supreme court. I believe NM vote was only a few hundred off and 2-3 others too close to call.

I Googled it: here is a timeline https://uselectionatlas.org/INFORMATION/ARTICLES/ElectionNight/pe2000elecnighttime.php

2am Florida called, Bush declared winner. 4am Florida retracted, no winner. 6am Wisconsin finally called for Gore - no winner. Nov 10 - New Mexico retracted from Gore, and Oregon for Gore Florida still in recounts, until went to the Supreme Court and Gore conceded Dec 12th.

Historically in the modern era - Newspapers declared Dewey the winner over Truman in 48. (Morning after vote I believe.) in 1960 Kennedy stole the election in a razor thin margin (using the same democratic machine being used today. but he won the electoral college easily / to the same degree Trump did in 2016.) Nixon conceded that night.

Nothing I can think of in the age of TV / Radio otherwise. 1800's took time...

1
DuesImperator [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks fren! How many statistical anomalies have to be present for people (normies) to think “something doesn’t seem right here”?

2
Tex1oco 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the worst I've seen.

We are well beyond plausibility I think!!! We have 7 states (6 if you believe FOX) that are too close to call as of 3rd day of counting! Plus all the strange oops found a box of 130k votes all biden at 4am type stuff. MI having 89% turnout or something like that (I think I saw that, when Obama only had 72 the prev. record...)

Something interesting, I think its on LBJ's wiki page for 1946 election. His first election to the US Senate. 5 days after the primary vote, 200 ballots, names in alphabetical order, in the same ink were added to the vote. Putting him over the top by like 80 votes out of 1 million. Books were later written describing this and much larger fraud. Dem fraud in the 1960 Kennedy v Nixon, lots of LBJ's races and others are completely accepted by history. Chicago democratic fraud machine for Obama and Hilary is well documented (and much in WI, MI, PA - but less accepted yet. )

3
DisrespectfulNipplez 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's what I thought

1
BlackLivesMurder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not this bad the one with jfk went into the next say but that's it