43
Comments (8)
sorted by:
3
ObviousStatementMan [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Time to dig frens. It's looking like this watermarked ballot theory may* hold water. People getting banned for it. Fact Checker warnings for searching anything re: "Watermark" or "Printed Ballots".

It is looking more and more like this is a massive trap!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
ObviousStatementMan [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm glad you asked...

The working theory is this:

Officially requested/printed ballots had a watermark applied. A very advanced watermark, using blockchain/crytpo to track it. The rumor is that they can use this to not only ID the ballot, but, to also physically geo-locate them.

Meaning that fake ballots could be instantly sniffed out. Strike 1 ... this is #WaterMarkGate

Print at home ballots? They need to be recorded by election officials. But they also leave a paper trail. If the mailed print @ home ballots don't match the vote submitted? That's **strike 2. **

Strike 3? Dead/relocated/blank official ballots filled out.

2
iliv4gamez 2 points ago +2 / -0

I genuinely hope this is true. It would be so good.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ObviousStatementMan [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

If a UV light shows a watermark/pattern on a ballot that was never mailed back, would that convince you to at least consider the possibility of this being a trap?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Rhayne 0 points ago +1 / -1

Someone sent me this.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200258338A1/en?oq=us2020%2f0258338+A1

Idk I'd this validates anything or not. Haven't had time to read it all