Time to dig frens. It's looking like this watermarked ballot theory may* hold water. People getting banned for it. Fact Checker warnings for searching anything re: "Watermark" or "Printed Ballots".
It is looking more and more like this is a massive trap!
Officially requested/printed ballots had a watermark applied. A very advanced watermark, using blockchain/crytpo to track it. The rumor is that they can use this to not only ID the ballot, but, to also physically geo-locate them.
Meaning that fake ballots could be instantly sniffed out. Strike 1 ... this is #WaterMarkGate
Print at home ballots? They need to be recorded by election officials. But they also leave a paper trail. If the mailed print @ home ballots don't match the vote submitted? That's **strike 2. **
Strike 3? Dead/relocated/blank official ballots filled out.
If a UV light shows a watermark/pattern on a ballot that was never mailed back, would that convince you to at least consider the possibility of this being a trap?
Time to dig frens. It's looking like this watermarked ballot theory may* hold water. People getting banned for it. Fact Checker warnings for searching anything re: "Watermark" or "Printed Ballots".
It is looking more and more like this is a massive trap!
I'm glad you asked...
The working theory is this:
Officially requested/printed ballots had a watermark applied. A very advanced watermark, using blockchain/crytpo to track it. The rumor is that they can use this to not only ID the ballot, but, to also physically geo-locate them.
Meaning that fake ballots could be instantly sniffed out. Strike 1 ... this is #WaterMarkGate
Print at home ballots? They need to be recorded by election officials. But they also leave a paper trail. If the mailed print @ home ballots don't match the vote submitted? That's **strike 2. **
Strike 3? Dead/relocated/blank official ballots filled out.
I genuinely hope this is true. It would be so good.
If a UV light shows a watermark/pattern on a ballot that was never mailed back, would that convince you to at least consider the possibility of this being a trap?
Someone sent me this.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200258338A1/en?oq=us2020%2f0258338+A1
Idk I'd this validates anything or not. Haven't had time to read it all