She could be, but that would require the guy sitting across from her "to be in on it."
There are MAGA poll workers on .win who can explain the process better but as I understand it, if a ballot is rejected more than one person looks at it to determine the intent of the voter before transcribing the vote to a new ballot to be counted.
It was known after 2018 that there was questionable activity and a whole bunch of people said "we need to have more eyes on the polls." The problem seems to be that there aren't enough MAGA eyes for whatever reason.
But even if there were enough MAGA eyes, a rejected ballot would still be treated the same way.
Not sure what state this is, but some states forced GOP poll observers and workers out. A judge forced them to let them back in later in one, I believe.
I've seen that, too, but it doesn't mean the woman in the video is doing anything untoward. It does mean that there's no way to MAGA verify and I think that's wrong.
If they are filling out provisional forms without observers then they are doing a disservice to the american voter. They both should insist on having an observer present. Integrity is a two way street.
sorry, since I made that comment, i've read up on the procedure. apparently its a thing, and when done, they are supposed to keep the original ballot for recount purposes.
I just don't understand why it would have to be done in the first place. It sounds seriously fishy to me to do all that extra work to add the number to a digital count instead of just tallying such ballots up the old fashioned style. I am getting all paranoid here looking at this election and finding out about this procedure, I am reminded of the rumors of CIA intercepting voting machines to alter voting counts.
No, it's not. If it were "transcription" she would be transcribing from someplace. Do you see another ballot that she is copying from? NO? and why is that? Because she is filling out ballots, not transcribing. God, have you never worked in a polling place?
Okay, so did you see them following anything looking like these?
Procedures — Two People Work as a Team
Sort ballots to be duplicated by precinct number.
Pull blank ballots to match the number of ballots to be duplicated within each precinct. Tear off voter receipt at top of ballot as needed.
Assign a serial number to use on the damaged and blank ballots. The format of the number is a combination of type of ballot, precinct number and sequential number, VBM 1-X. Example: VBM-1001-1, VBM-1001-2, etc.
FED — outside the United States indefinitely (federal offices only)
OSM — outside the United States temporarily or in the military
POL — polling place or provisional ballot
VBM — vote-by-mail or “all mail” precinct
Write the serial number, in red ink, in the upper right corner of both the damaged and blank ballot.
Stamp VOID on the damaged ballot.
Stamp DUPLICATE on the blank ballot.
One team member reads from the damaged ballot while the other team member marks the blank ballot.
Fill out the duplication log sheet for each ballot being duplicated and check the reason for the duplication.
Both team members initial the voided and the duplicated ballot.
Store the VOIDED ballots boxes marked as follows: VOID DAMAGED BALLOTS, type of ballot (VBM, POLLS, etc.), and the name and date of the election. Number the boxes 1 of 2, 2 of 2, etc. as needed.
Store DUPLICATE ballots, rubber-banded together in precinct order, in boxes that correspond to the boxes of voided ballots and mark in center of box, no more than 4″ wide, as follows: DUPLICATES TO BE COUNTED, type of ballot (VBM, POLLS, etc.),date of the election and precinct range. Number the boxes 1 of X, 2 of X, etc. as needed
Nope, sure didn't. She just pulled the ballot off the stack, marked the same set of choices, and moved it to a stack of 6. Pretty clear even by "PA" standards she's not following directions. BTW, Cook County Judge of Election, 20 yrs...Republican.
According to regulations, the "damaged" ballot should be marked and logged. It's not. That means that the same stack of "damaged" ballots can be put on someone else's desk and "transcribed" again.
If a ballot doesn’t scan, they’re allowed to make a duplicate, stamp as duplicate, log the original, and put a serial number on both of them.
Do you see any observers?
Because there’s no fucking way even in the legit process that anyone should be allowed to create new ballots invalidate an old one and do so with no oversight.
It looks like the guy on the other side of the table is reading her the damaged ballot that she transcribes. They are clearly interracting and moving their papers at the same rate. I didnt know this a was a real procedure before tonight.
It was a logical exclamation. The issue here isn’t the idiots getting wrapped up in what she’s doing, it’s that she’s filling out a new ballot she’s marking an old one as invalid (probably), May be doing a correct and legal process… WITH NO OBSERVERS.
Well it COULD BE fraud but IT'S LIKELY transcription. Damaged ballots can be copied before being counted - it's normal and entirely within the rules. Let's not overreact.
False positives will help the other side to discredit legitimate claims of fraud.
Transcribing like referencing the damaged ballot and transferring to a new one? But there is no ballot she is referencing. Just blanks. Memorized the results of all the damaged ballots first?
If she was transcribing damaged ballots, where are the damaged ballots she is transcribing from? Wouldn’t she need to check that she was filling in all the correct boxes from the damaged ballot instead of just filling in the boxes she chooses out of her head?
Seems fishy af - especially considering how poll watchers are not permitted to observe.
People keep saying this is transcription. What is she transcribing? is she looking at bad ballots and copying the answers on to good ballots, or is she just going down filling it out? If she is transcribing something she should be looking at two documents.
Poll worker bitch caught doing her job, and transcribing a ballot like they do in every election, and you don’t even know who the ballot was voting for
thanks for explaining
I think people would feel a lot more comfortable if they knew it wasn't a one sided (all D or all R) process.
How do we know that? they are not allowing observors so she could be filling out any fucking thing.
She could be, but that would require the guy sitting across from her "to be in on it."
There are MAGA poll workers on .win who can explain the process better but as I understand it, if a ballot is rejected more than one person looks at it to determine the intent of the voter before transcribing the vote to a new ballot to be counted.
It was known after 2018 that there was questionable activity and a whole bunch of people said "we need to have more eyes on the polls." The problem seems to be that there aren't enough MAGA eyes for whatever reason.
But even if there were enough MAGA eyes, a rejected ballot would still be treated the same way.
Not sure what state this is, but some states forced GOP poll observers and workers out. A judge forced them to let them back in later in one, I believe.
Which then of course takes us back to: "Damaged ballot transcription may be legal and normal, but with no watchers is ripe for fraud".
I've seen that, too, but it doesn't mean the woman in the video is doing anything untoward. It does mean that there's no way to MAGA verify and I think that's wrong.
If they are filling out provisional forms without observers then they are doing a disservice to the american voter. They both should insist on having an observer present. Integrity is a two way street.
No argument there, but I doubt they'd have observers assigned to every table.
Really... you think that's a stretch amongst the REEEEsistance?
Besides, they aren't paying much attention to the other person's work, just on their own - it wouldn't be that hard to flip ballots.
ok surrrre
Dem poll worker bad /MAGA-NPC
This is bullshit, they aren't looking at anything, there is no transcription. They are just filling them out one after another
I like this much better bc you will be able to at least verify the counts match and determine if the rejection rate is a problem.
Hopefully there will be changes moving forward.
sorry, since I made that comment, i've read up on the procedure. apparently its a thing, and when done, they are supposed to keep the original ballot for recount purposes.
I just don't understand why it would have to be done in the first place. It sounds seriously fishy to me to do all that extra work to add the number to a digital count instead of just tallying such ballots up the old fashioned style. I am getting all paranoid here looking at this election and finding out about this procedure, I am reminded of the rumors of CIA intercepting voting machines to alter voting counts.
If this was the case where is the ballot they are transcribing
No, it's not. If it were "transcription" she would be transcribing from someplace. Do you see another ballot that she is copying from? NO? and why is that? Because she is filling out ballots, not transcribing. God, have you never worked in a polling place?
Okay, so did you see them following anything looking like these? Procedures — Two People Work as a Team
Sort ballots to be duplicated by precinct number. Pull blank ballots to match the number of ballots to be duplicated within each precinct. Tear off voter receipt at top of ballot as needed. Assign a serial number to use on the damaged and blank ballots. The format of the number is a combination of type of ballot, precinct number and sequential number, VBM 1-X. Example: VBM-1001-1, VBM-1001-2, etc. FED — outside the United States indefinitely (federal offices only) OSM — outside the United States temporarily or in the military POL — polling place or provisional ballot VBM — vote-by-mail or “all mail” precinct Write the serial number, in red ink, in the upper right corner of both the damaged and blank ballot. Stamp VOID on the damaged ballot. Stamp DUPLICATE on the blank ballot. One team member reads from the damaged ballot while the other team member marks the blank ballot. Fill out the duplication log sheet for each ballot being duplicated and check the reason for the duplication. Both team members initial the voided and the duplicated ballot. Store the VOIDED ballots boxes marked as follows: VOID DAMAGED BALLOTS, type of ballot (VBM, POLLS, etc.), and the name and date of the election. Number the boxes 1 of 2, 2 of 2, etc. as needed. Store DUPLICATE ballots, rubber-banded together in precinct order, in boxes that correspond to the boxes of voided ballots and mark in center of box, no more than 4″ wide, as follows: DUPLICATES TO BE COUNTED, type of ballot (VBM, POLLS, etc.),date of the election and precinct range. Number the boxes 1 of X, 2 of X, etc. as needed
Nope, sure didn't. She just pulled the ballot off the stack, marked the same set of choices, and moved it to a stack of 6. Pretty clear even by "PA" standards she's not following directions. BTW, Cook County Judge of Election, 20 yrs...Republican.
Where are the ballots they are supposed to be copying?
so how we know it really was damaged ballot transcription if no observers were allowed?
Why were the observers not allowed if it was all valid?
Something does not add up.
There are no reference ballots, they are just doing the same thing over and over
Yeah I noticed that too.
How do you know it's "transcription"? I don't see here comparing it to another ballot so she can work it. Nor do I know why you would need to.
Thanks. I see the dude is supposedly calling out votes and she's filling them in.
We'll see what is real I hope. Let's see if there is a believable number of "transcribed" ballots, etc.
Thank you. Thedonald has devolved into a shit show. Remember a few days ago when the majority of posts were intelligent, informative or funny?
According to regulations, the "damaged" ballot should be marked and logged. It's not. That means that the same stack of "damaged" ballots can be put on someone else's desk and "transcribed" again.
If a ballot doesn’t scan, they’re allowed to make a duplicate, stamp as duplicate, log the original, and put a serial number on both of them.
Do you see any observers?
Because there’s no fucking way even in the legit process that anyone should be allowed to create new ballots invalidate an old one and do so with no oversight.
WHO TF HOLDS A PEN LIKE THAT???
he's left handed, too
https://archive.is/EIIFv here's the archive.
Any retard that holds a pencil like that is clearly a democrat. And the other guy is a sloppy looking beta, democrat too.
Hang them both.
You understand that no matter who is in power police will always be needed. So they don't care about any of this !!
It looks like the guy on the other side of the table is reading her the damaged ballot that she transcribes. They are clearly interracting and moving their papers at the same rate. I didnt know this a was a real procedure before tonight.
Wha wha what?
A logical explanation??
It was a logical exclamation. The issue here isn’t the idiots getting wrapped up in what she’s doing, it’s that she’s filling out a new ballot she’s marking an old one as invalid (probably), May be doing a correct and legal process… WITH NO OBSERVERS.
Well it COULD BE fraud but IT'S LIKELY transcription. Damaged ballots can be copied before being counted - it's normal and entirely within the rules. Let's not overreact.
False positives will help the other side to discredit legitimate claims of fraud.
Transcribing like referencing the damaged ballot and transferring to a new one? But there is no ballot she is referencing. Just blanks. Memorized the results of all the damaged ballots first?
There is a guy directly in front of her going at the same pace with an already filled-in ballot.
He is reading the damaged ballot, she is transcribing what he reads.
That does appear to be the case, where are the observers?
If she was transcribing damaged ballots, where are the damaged ballots she is transcribing from? Wouldn’t she need to check that she was filling in all the correct boxes from the damaged ballot instead of just filling in the boxes she chooses out of her head?
Seems fishy af - especially considering how poll watchers are not permitted to observe.
You’re asking the wrong question.
The guy right across from her seems to be clearly transcribing to her. He talks, she fills in a bubble.
The right question: is where are the observers?
I missed that he was reading to her.
But she still could put whoever she wants.
Absolutely. There MUST be observers here, and there are not.
only reason to hold a pen like that is to disguise whatever it is you are doing. That, or you are a fucking retard.
You must not know any left handed people lol
People keep saying this is transcription. What is she transcribing? is she looking at bad ballots and copying the answers on to good ballots, or is she just going down filling it out? If she is transcribing something she should be looking at two documents.
There is a guy directly in front of her going at the same pace with an already filled-in ballot.
He is reading the damaged ballot, she is transcribing what he reads.
Video got removed.
It’s been removed! Can you reupload to BitChute?
These are the people who need to pay. Crush them after we secure the presidency.
Sticky sticky sticky mods
Hang her
Holy fuck
This chick writes like a fucking chicken
Poll worker bitch caught doing her job, and transcribing a ballot like they do in every election, and you don’t even know who the ballot was voting for
This won't stand.
WTH?! A cop even walks by the table as she’s forging them and doesn’t do/say anything.