417
posted ago by HeelsUpHarris ago by HeelsUpHarris +417 / -0

Not only is it annoying but the dems don't even need fake ballots they have send millions of official mail in ballots do you really think that UPS and other post services delivered them all? They most likely have millions of blank official ballots that they can fill in after filtering who hasn't voted yet. Don't enter a infowars rabbit hole thinking that it will all be fine because the ballots are marked.

Comments (47)
sorted by:
24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
9
hondo1 9 points ago +9 / -0

I get what you're saying, but there's literally no way they would have, for example, brought in 138k real mail-in ballots in the middle of the night. This is very big, if real.

Also, nobody on either side knew anything about the peace agreements until they came out. If you're fighting the mob you have to have tight lips.

It's not a sure thing, but the evidence is stacking up. There's something there for sure. What it is, we don't yet know.

6
PuffyHerb 6 points ago +6 / -0

Exactly. The other big issue I see is that ballots are printed at the state level. You'd need people inside the state at every level and to keep it from the Dems? No chance.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
ekos640 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did you know, counterfeit money is only ever used in crimes? Never real money. Nope. Not at all. Muh isotopes!

19
BakedBlunts 19 points ago +19 / -0

Yea I dont know about the watermark, but Trump did say this in June...

RIGGED 2020 ELECTION: MILLIONS OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS WILL BE PRINTED BY FOREIGN COUNTRIES, AND OTHERS. IT WILL BE THE SCANDAL OF OUR TIMES!

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1275024974579982336?s=19

11
ThatOneGuyQmart 11 points ago +11 / -0

Im not saying this is true but he did said that they can track each ballots location. So if it didnt get mailed out to the proper locations then they would know correct?

4
deleted 4 points ago +10 / -6
1
Harambesbegottenson 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think having someone with some in depth knowledge on blockchain technology stickying a post would provide a lot of insight to users here because its not some magical technology that is constantly updating location data in real time and theres a lot of people on here that seem to think thats the case.

11
deleted 11 points ago +18 / -7
10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
6
hondo1 6 points ago +6 / -0

We have the best doubters and pragmatists!

5
grad16uc 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't know who to believe. On one hand, I assume there are safe guards so that ballots can't be faked but on the other, I don't think they're filling out fake ballots (I assume they're just filling out real ones).

Eric Trump is saying they have something though, so it's either this or something else.

3
Harambesbegottenson 3 points ago +3 / -0

IF the blockchain is true, and thats a BIG IF, the way they can prove that the mail ins that were printed and filled out were never mailed is they can track location. The blockchain would only register at a new location when it is scanned, and I would imagine they were requiring ballots to be scanned when loaded into envelopes to be mailed out. Those envelopes could then be scanned at the post office, and again when they are returned, and then finally when they are counted and submitted. If a ballot were to miss any of those steps, there would be reason to believe there was potential fraud taking place.

Now - whether or not the blockchain was actually used will be something that only time will tell. The DHS website said they were using a form of technology to fight fraud that had never been used before but did not clarify exactly what it was.

Regardless, any mail in ballots that were counted that never got scanned at a post office would easily be flagged and we dont even need the blockchain for that because the post office scans every piece of mail that enters a facility. There are many ways that we can determine the fraudulent ballots with or without the blockchain, but i personally believe in the future that the blockchain will be the only way to secure an election and once there is a better understanding of how the blockchain works throughout the population there will be a strong push to move towards that system.

1
grad16uc 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's reassuring to know. I guess we'll find out what's what over the next few weeks. I'd find it extremely hard to believe there isn't something shady going on.

9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
2
HeelsUpHarris [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Couldn't have said it better

2
Philmor_Tittus 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s right folks.... and once the jury box fails, you know what to do.

1
Leave_The_Kids_Alone 1 point ago +2 / -1

There is evidence supporting the story. I thought it was Q tier bullshit. However, the ballots have watermarks, DHS has a ton of election work on the record.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Leave_The_Kids_Alone 1 point ago +1 / -0

read through this thread.

Watermarks are real DHS printing ballots is real DHS cyber security chief talked about securing 2020 elections executive orders for foreign intervention.

I am not fully on board, but there supporting documents.

7
MooseKnukl3 7 points ago +8 / -1

Ok but where do they get 400-500k extra ballots to beat Trump in Philly? Those would have to come from other districts? You don't think the block chain technology tracks where they come from and through whose hands they passed by C'mon man.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
8
HeelsUpHarris [S] 8 points ago +9 / -1

It's so funny seeing everything I say being down voted as if they don't want to think critical about these things or hear other perspectives but just want to believe in whatever infowars says regardless of if it makes sense or not

5
Tsspop 5 points ago +6 / -1

It's just that you act like you have real intel and you know exactly what is happening. He is the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, he is doing things your little pea brain could never imagine possible. Chill out and don't be a negative nancy ffs.

6
IvotedforTrumptwice 6 points ago +6 / -0

Even if there was no watermark, there should be anti-counterfeiting measures on all ballots. Ballots are worth more than cash so why shouldn’t they be secured? I’m hoping after Trump wins, they will pass a voting reformed act that creates safe ballots that only the US can verify. China obviously printed millions of ballots and sent them here.

4
HeelsUpHarris [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

They could easily reform by cleaning all voter registration rolls and only allow votes with ID verification even setup a system where people receive a text notification after voting with a unique code which they can use to view who they voted for & only allow someone else to bring upwards to 3 ballots at once so if someone brings 10x3 ballots and his ID is registered 10x as having delivered ballots than it triggers a warning. All this is very easy to do

3
IvotedforTrumptwice 3 points ago +3 / -0

But voter ID is rayciss. Black people are too stupid And poor to get an ID.

1
HeelsUpHarris [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea I know it's always the silly and quite racist argument democrats use but I don't even understand why IDs have to cost money the government can just allocate a few billion towards it and make them free and only charge for replacement fee

3
DonaldTrump2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

Their 100% is a watermark on every ballot to authenticate it but this blochain thing is bullshit.

https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/mail-in-voting-election-integrity-safeguards_508.pdf

5
Carbum 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just hope porn imo.

5
Raritat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Watermark discussion is a distraction perpetrated by Steve Paczennik.

Opposition in 2020 had an unlimited supply of genuine blank ballots.

The fraud occurred by a large number of politically motivated busybodies. Watermarked ballots can only be used in a narrow set of situations, however it may be helpful if some illustrative instances are documented.

3
BrotherAshanti22 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'm of a different opinion.

Watermark! Watermark! Watermark!

3
iamherefortheluls 3 points ago +3 / -0

watermark isn't a thing because it would have been commented on by DHS already.

but if it was - it would catch the fraud because the paper was alleged to be using new tech that actually put a Unique Identifier on each ballot, which would have allowed comparisons such as where it was sent, and where it was received and where it was counted.

3
AtomicShnoz 3 points ago +3 / -0

First, did all states have to buy ballot stock from trump? second, they didn't mail more than half, the rest went to ballot marking houses. only if there is some way to show they were OR ballots that show up in PA.

However one thing is true, trump has been silent letting the left think he is wilting and they are getting away with it and cheat brazenly in the open

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
HeelsUpHarris [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also said this to someone else there but: It's not impossible to have machines that can compare already voted to the voter registration list filter out those that didn't vote and make the machine fill out blanket ballots with that voters registration data they don't even have to do this process manually. All we need is more mail carriers to come forward the FBI needs to get involved and investigate this by approaching employees

1
infojunkie07 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could explain teh ferrari for speedy delivery

3
Thingthing22 3 points ago +3 / -0

The video states they would know everything about who the ballots touched and where the ballots where at any given time. Some science fiction bullshit for sure, and perhaps bait to get more whistleblowers to come forward. All Trump wants, is a win. He doesn't want to out this sort of fraud just yet. He's got more traps to lay, especially if he can win without revealing the plan yet. When he actually loses the first time, well bois, that's when he push the button. Could be today. Could be when he loses in 2024 before he goes out the door. Just wait, watch, and see.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
JustTheNews 2 points ago +2 / -0

yep

2
probablyacoincidence 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can track total ballots sent out in an area though. If they are throwing out Trump ballots and creating Biden ballots, the total ballots used vs total votes cast will be way off. Im sure there's a standard deviation, but like many other indicators it will be way outside the deviation

5
HeelsUpHarris [S] 5 points ago +6 / -1

We already have whistle blowers coming forward claiming that the higher ups edited the dates of received mail in ballots if they are capable of doing this than don't you think that they would be capable of manipulating the send ballot numbers as well? The DOJ is investigating it but I won't get my hopes up trump needs private investigators that can go out and approach employees

2
prospektor 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't know if this counts as a doomer post, but I assume that most of the ballots are indeed authentic, official ballots. Who filled them out is another story completely - as we've seen, there were ballots submitted by "dead voters", i.e. someone filling out their ballot and sending it in. It doesn't matter if these ballots get sorted out when somebody double checks and finds the voter deceased - whoever filled out that ballot could just as well fill out other ballots for voters who are NOT deceased, and nobody would realize that, unless that voter somehow gets told they already have voted when they show up in person. Now, if you steal (or not deliver - looking at you here, USPS) ballots from areas that are traditionally low participation, if most of these people never show up to vote, they will never realize somebody voted in their stead. Also, if the poll workers simply not tell the voter that there already is a ballot cast in their name, but just silently have the in-person vote "overrule" the mail-in ballot (as I understand the process), the voter would also never know that there was another vote he just cancelled out. I'd really like to know if there is a way to check how many mail-in ballots were discarded because the voter showed up in person, if there is a way to check that, some "paper trail". Some might have legitimately wanted to change their vote, but who knows how many never showed up to vote and nobody would suspect "their" mail-in ballot was not submitted by them.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
-2
BigMikesBlackCock -2 points ago +3 / -5

Pleaee go fuck yourself ! I N F O W A R S . C O M