I posted the wrong link. Corrected now. Look at page 9. It talks a lot about CISA, doesn’t it? It establishes in the paper I posted earlier that CISA is an important part of securing the elections. DHS and CISA are working together. Here’s CISA talking about watermarked mail-in ballots.
You just keep posting irrelevant information that does not support your claims in any way. You can believe whatever crazy shit you want to, but that won't make it true.
At least I have information to support my claims. Idk how you think the links I posted are irrelevant since they are from DHS, CISA, and the US Patent Office. I must have made these links up myself.
Not one word on that page about watermarks, ballots, much less about DHS providing paper for ballots to be printed on.
I posted the wrong link. Corrected now. Look at page 9. It talks a lot about CISA, doesn’t it? It establishes in the paper I posted earlier that CISA is an important part of securing the elections. DHS and CISA are working together. Here’s CISA talking about watermarked mail-in ballots.
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/mail-in-voting-election-integrity-safeguards_508.pdf
https://pdfaiw.uspto.gov/.aiw?PageNum=0&docid=20200258338&IDKey=7A4F4EA40D1F&HomeUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fappft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO1%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526d%3DPG01%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html%2526r%3D1%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526s1%3D20200258338.PGNR.%2526OS%3D%2526RS%3D
You just keep posting irrelevant information that does not support your claims in any way. You can believe whatever crazy shit you want to, but that won't make it true.
At least I have information to support my claims. Idk how you think the links I posted are irrelevant since they are from DHS, CISA, and the US Patent Office. I must have made these links up myself.