To those promoting the 'Special Printing Marks' on Ballots as some magic bullet to invalidate the fraudulent votes:
-
This is not the issue with the fraud.
-
Tens of millions of mail in ballots were printed 'lawfully' using whatever printing process federal authorities approved. And were mailed out like grocery coupons everywhere. Like confetti dropped across the land.
-
It is the fraudulent completion, harvesting and submission of these millions of mail-in confetti ballots as real votes that is the issue. THAT is the issue. THAT is the vehicle of this fraud.
-
In some states such as PA, corrupt state governments have removed all validation checks on these ballots, including even postmark and signature requirements.
-
The ballots are legitimate. The votes are fake.
I really wish people would get off this ballot printing detour.
This needs a sticky for a couple hours, as the fixation on the ballot printing is distracting from the real battle.
This, they're using legit ballots, the distribution and collection are the issue.
Exactly. The votes are what is fake; not the ballots.
Someone even tried to post that there was a radioactive molecule in each legit ballot that the DHS or some new agency put there to detect fraud.
Im our company's RSO and deal with the NRC regularly. The chances of this happening are about 0%.
If you "print" new ballots and fill them for the purpose of Post-Election day shenanigans... that's where we have them.
i agree with a couple of possible exceptions:
Were the number of watermarked ballots capped at a certain amount? I've heard of people receiving multiple votes addressed to them.
The case of PA where they don't need a postmark or signature. If you don't care about the most basic election security methods there's nothing stopping your photocopier from going BRRRRR. This may also apply to anywhere there was a sudden Biden drop of ballots in the early AM.
But you may be right, they could have just got into the stock of watermarked ballots and had a bubble-filling party and then what good is a watermark?
The President identified this issue with the mail in ballots in June, when they started going out. You just can't throw millions of ballots out in the mail and not expect fraud. Not with Democrats.
The voter rolls in these states are train wrecks, and haven't been purged in years.
Dead people were getting mail in ballots sent out. I know, because we got one. We destroyed ours. But there was a massive harvesting operation set up for them in these D hellhole cities I am sure.
I think everyone in the watermark train hopes that if they had the foresight to implement watermarks they had other controls as well.
They also hoped Sessions wasn't a completely useless tool yet here we are.
Watermark Derangement Syndrome is spreading fast with supporters. Have we really gone off the cliff that we'll believe anything to keep the faith?!? I trust Trump, but yikes, we're losing it (mentally) here. We need to keep it together!
Posts like this are legit and deserve to be stickied!
The only issue I have is that while I don't believe there will be enough of these so called ballots that are not watermarked to make an issue I do believe that there may be enough to force more scrutity in the shenanigans currently happening.
Lets say that watermarking ballots is an actual thing. Then it should in theory go deeper than that. With current tech are we not able to identify when these legit ballots were sent out and when they were recieved? Can't we tell via the post office if the date on it is correct? Or is it just as simple as having hundreds or more of people across all these states with a stamp indicating it was recieved and reviewed to be counted b4 11:59pm on Nov 3rd.
My point being is just cause the ballot is a watermarked ballot it doesn't mean it's a legit vote.
Apparently there are several ways to track mail as it travels through the USPS system, and all mail is photographed nowadays.
If every piece is photographed documenting time and place of mailing combined with the watermarked info in document (if it exist) you should be able to identify sequencing anomalies that could be helpful
My ballot was printed for me while I checked in during early voting. DHS didn't print it, a local poll volunteer did.
Yes, and you were standing there. And CHECKED IN.
These mail in ballots have no check in, and are effectively anonymous.
Hopium.
secret marks is a psyop so when they find the marks on the forged ballots they can say, "see? its legit"
Thank you for posting this. I’ve been saying this and threads and got tired of repeating it.
Very much this. In California, they have removed all forms of verification to the validity of voters on each official ballots.
We no longer live in a democracy, it's a one party oligarchy system
It appears to be a mix of both: Legitimate ballots filled out fraudulently, and fake ballots printed outside the United States that were dumped at the counting station at 4 am by the tens of thousands.