113
posted ago by MisterKag ago by MisterKag +113 / -0

To those promoting the 'Special Printing Marks' on Ballots as some magic bullet to invalidate the fraudulent votes:

  1. This is not the issue with the fraud.

  2. Tens of millions of mail in ballots were printed 'lawfully' using whatever printing process federal authorities approved. And were mailed out like grocery coupons everywhere. Like confetti dropped across the land.

  3. It is the fraudulent completion, harvesting and submission of these millions of mail-in confetti ballots as real votes that is the issue. THAT is the issue. THAT is the vehicle of this fraud.

  4. In some states such as PA, corrupt state governments have removed all validation checks on these ballots, including even postmark and signature requirements.

  5. The ballots are legitimate. The votes are fake.

I really wish people would get off this ballot printing detour.

This needs a sticky for a couple hours, as the fixation on the ballot printing is distracting from the real battle.

Comments (19)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Cifu 1 point ago +2 / -1

Posts like this are legit and deserve to be stickied!

The only issue I have is that while I don't believe there will be enough of these so called ballots that are not watermarked to make an issue I do believe that there may be enough to force more scrutity in the shenanigans currently happening.

Lets say that watermarking ballots is an actual thing. Then it should in theory go deeper than that. With current tech are we not able to identify when these legit ballots were sent out and when they were recieved? Can't we tell via the post office if the date on it is correct? Or is it just as simple as having hundreds or more of people across all these states with a stamp indicating it was recieved and reviewed to be counted b4 11:59pm on Nov 3rd.

My point being is just cause the ballot is a watermarked ballot it doesn't mean it's a legit vote.

1
HillarysBeaverMunch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently there are several ways to track mail as it travels through the USPS system, and all mail is photographed nowadays.

1
the_bird 1 point ago +1 / -0

If every piece is photographed documenting time and place of mailing combined with the watermarked info in document (if it exist) you should be able to identify sequencing anomalies that could be helpful