I’m a shill account with over 10,000 points and sticky’s. Right. And they are transcribing. Everything isn’t something just because someone posted it. You’re thinking like a leftist
They’ll transcribe a damaged ballot if the machine won’t read it. They guy is reading the ballots to her. The issue in this video is there is no independent monitor to verify correct transcription, or at a minimum he doesn’t verify she transcribed correctly, and he doesn’t mark the ballot in any way as being transcribed, opening up the possibility it can be transcribed again.
Wow!!!! Thanks for breaking this story!!!! I’ll tell everyone!!!!!
And then there is the rest of your post history.
I didn’t say this is legit or not legit. Best case where the fuck are the observers? if you have two people writing in ballots as they see fit that’s not legal. This is a system of observation, not of trust.
Whatever. It’s a bullshit post. It’s been beaten like a dead horse on here. How do you know they’re aren’t observers? You don’t know anything about what’s going on there, and neither do I. They stole the election, but posting shit you have no facts about and calling it fraud because you say it is, is fucking ignorant. Makes you no different than a leftist.
Auto fill they’re instead of there. Who says there aren’t observers? The point is, you shouldn’t just make serious claims and accusations about something you don’t know shit about. That’s what leftists do.
You could be a shill or not, but you're also not wrong. I don't know if people here haven't been paying attention during previous elections, but I have, and this is something they report on every single time. Now, we don't know if they are transcribing faithfully (although it looks like they are in this video at least), but transcribing is a thing that's been going on for years.
They should be machine-read and then another machine should verify that the first machine was correct.
Discrepancies should be examined by a team of independents; all filmed and not from several feet away.
Your ballot should not contain your name, only a randomly-generated number, so filming the examination of your ballot will not interfere with your privacy.
No mail-in ballots. You show up.
Some exceptions made for those who are not mobile, but NO harvesting.
Thank you. And yes, I’m a shill with over 10,000 upvotes and sticky’s. The Donald has regressed into a low intelligence shit show. I think I’m done here for awhile.
The proof of transcribing is the bottom question on the middle column. The original ballots are identical except that question and the woman properly fills out that question differently.
The guy across from her has the original ballots. He's reading off to her.
At first it looks like she's just marking the ballots all the same en-masse in a big fraud operation, but the bottom question on the middle column is different between the first and second ballot.
So if this was a "quick, fabricate ballots", they wouldn't be marking various questions differently like that. They'd be marking the ones they want to win, to win.
It's proof at least that we need GOP representatives present at every one of these tables to visibly observe what's going on. This camera doesn't let you see what's going on on the paper.
There is a woman filling out ballots with no one really watching her. she sitting across from a guy who is probably transcribing to her, but he can’t see her actions.
Guess what? I'm registered as a Democrat...having 1 "Republican" and 1 "Democrat" going over ballots with a pen is not a foolproof method. These actions need to be observed by separate individuals to ensure they're being done faithfully.
I beg to differ- this is not THE SCHEME. These are just two poll workers doing their job -curing/duplicating a ballot- in broad daylight. The scheme is up at 4 AM in the morning.
It's often not because it wasn't filled out correctly. It's because being in the envelope or drop box with other papers, things get smudged and the machine can't read it.
It looks like she is writing down responses from the guy reading responses to her from the guy. However, there are no observers close enough to tell if that is being done accurately. Also, she is not capturing voter information, so it would be impossible to link the "corrected" ballot back to the original in case of an audit. This all needs to be explained to the public.
If a ballot comes in with stray marks or check marks rather than completely filled-in bubbles, a bi partisan team determines the intent of the voter. The team must agree on each ballot marking. When they do, a new ballot is generated reflecting the voters intent which can then be counted.
In CO the ballot in question is scanned, recorded and saved for a paper trail and the new ballot is also scanned. Nothing is done by hand.
There’s no oversight in this video. No accountability.
They do this when the ballot is damaged and can't be read by the machine. It's duplication. Notice they stamp the ballot and then copy to the new ballot. The stamped original is put aside and the 'new' ballot is fed to the machine. That should be one democrat and one republican at that table.
Not that I "KNOW" that that's what i'm seeing, just a possibility.
Don't know the details. Apparently she is rewriting ballots that they had received that couldn't be counted by the system, but were clearly marked (the ones the man is holding). Apparently the fraud here is, that this was done without GOP observers, but don't know for sure
Wow!!!! Thanks for breaking this story!!!! I’ll tell everyone!!!!!
Looks like shill account. This comment directly follows a “This isnt fraud, they’re transcribing”
I’m a shill account with over 10,000 points and sticky’s. Right. And they are transcribing. Everything isn’t something just because someone posted it. You’re thinking like a leftist
Why the fuck would anyone be "transcribing" ballots while they're counting them!
They’ll transcribe a damaged ballot if the machine won’t read it. They guy is reading the ballots to her. The issue in this video is there is no independent monitor to verify correct transcription, or at a minimum he doesn’t verify she transcribed correctly, and he doesn’t mark the ballot in any way as being transcribed, opening up the possibility it can be transcribed again.
Oh well that's handy, iddn't it? "The machine can't read this so I'll just make up a new one." Just fucking great.
Your right! Tell the president immediately!
And then there is the rest of your post history.
I didn’t say this is legit or not legit. Best case where the fuck are the observers? if you have two people writing in ballots as they see fit that’s not legal. This is a system of observation, not of trust.
Whatever. It’s a bullshit post. It’s been beaten like a dead horse on here. How do you know they’re aren’t observers? You don’t know anything about what’s going on there, and neither do I. They stole the election, but posting shit you have no facts about and calling it fraud because you say it is, is fucking ignorant. Makes you no different than a leftist.
Yes, the people filling in the ballots are also observers this makes a ton of sense!
They’re just dual role why didn’t I think of that!?
Auto fill they’re instead of there. Who says there aren’t observers? The point is, you shouldn’t just make serious claims and accusations about something you don’t know shit about. That’s what leftists do.
There are no observers in that video.
So because you just posted thye are transcribing ... means they are not just transcribing?
You could be a shill or not, but you're also not wrong. I don't know if people here haven't been paying attention during previous elections, but I have, and this is something they report on every single time. Now, we don't know if they are transcribing faithfully (although it looks like they are in this video at least), but transcribing is a thing that's been going on for years.
How do we know it’s even a biden vote? The point is, it’s ignorant to claim shit you don’t know anything about. That’s leftist behavior.
It needs to stop.
No one should be touching ballots.
They should be machine-read and then another machine should verify that the first machine was correct.
Discrepancies should be examined by a team of independents; all filmed and not from several feet away.
Your ballot should not contain your name, only a randomly-generated number, so filming the examination of your ballot will not interfere with your privacy.
No mail-in ballots. You show up.
Some exceptions made for those who are not mobile, but NO harvesting.
Voter ID issued by the passport agency.
Thank you. And yes, I’m a shill with over 10,000 upvotes and sticky’s. The Donald has regressed into a low intelligence shit show. I think I’m done here for awhile.
The proof of transcribing is the bottom question on the middle column. The original ballots are identical except that question and the woman properly fills out that question differently.
The guy across from her has the original ballots. He's reading off to her.
At first it looks like she's just marking the ballots all the same en-masse in a big fraud operation, but the bottom question on the middle column is different between the first and second ballot.
So if this was a "quick, fabricate ballots", they wouldn't be marking various questions differently like that. They'd be marking the ones they want to win, to win.
They are curing/duplicating a ballot that the ballot scanner couldn't handle.
Guy is reading the smudgy ballot to her and she's transcribing it into a clean duplicate.
If you're looking for blatant fraud this isnt't it.
And we'll just take them at their word that they're doing it faithfully, right?
No we don't. But this vid shows but two ordinary poll workers doing their job. Feel free to share it if you think it's proof- I think it's not.
It's proof at least that we need GOP representatives present at every one of these tables to visibly observe what's going on. This camera doesn't let you see what's going on on the paper.
Since these are two poll workers teamed up they should split 1+ republican and 1+ democrat.
I'm a registered Democrat...
What's stopping anyone from being registered with one party and working against that party's interests in these cases?
These actions need to be observed by additional individuals to ensure they're being done faithfully
They should...
Where are the overseers? Clearly there are none in the room.
Yes, this does look like a fairly legit transcribing if they were people monitoring. there are not.
Best case, this was a proper process done illegally.
Dude there's even a police officer sited.
There is a woman filling out ballots with no one really watching her. she sitting across from a guy who is probably transcribing to her, but he can’t see her actions.
And there were no observers watching this happen?
Guess what? I'm registered as a Democrat...having 1 "Republican" and 1 "Democrat" going over ballots with a pen is not a foolproof method. These actions need to be observed by separate individuals to ensure they're being done faithfully.
They won't let people observe the smudged ballot and they won't let people observe the new one to see if it's done in good faith. THIS IS THE SCHEME.
I beg to differ- this is not THE SCHEME. These are just two poll workers doing their job -curing/duplicating a ballot- in broad daylight. The scheme is up at 4 AM in the morning.
So why not let someone observe up close, shill. You're trying to tell me they couldn't commit fraud right there in plain sight? GTFO.
OP asked "...if anyone can explain what is happening it would help us".
That's what I did.
Now u GTFO.
It's often not because it wasn't filled out correctly. It's because being in the envelope or drop box with other papers, things get smudged and the machine can't read it.
There should be no envelopes and no drop boxes.
Where do you propose the ballots be held while being gathered to be counted...?
It looks like she is writing down responses from the guy reading responses to her from the guy. However, there are no observers close enough to tell if that is being done accurately. Also, she is not capturing voter information, so it would be impossible to link the "corrected" ballot back to the original in case of an audit. This all needs to be explained to the public.
This is called “adjudication” in CO.
If a ballot comes in with stray marks or check marks rather than completely filled-in bubbles, a bi partisan team determines the intent of the voter. The team must agree on each ballot marking. When they do, a new ballot is generated reflecting the voters intent which can then be counted.
In CO the ballot in question is scanned, recorded and saved for a paper trail and the new ballot is also scanned. Nothing is done by hand.
There’s no oversight in this video. No accountability.
Fraud potential is off the scale!
They do this when the ballot is damaged and can't be read by the machine. It's duplication. Notice they stamp the ballot and then copy to the new ballot. The stamped original is put aside and the 'new' ballot is fed to the machine. That should be one democrat and one republican at that table.
Not that I "KNOW" that that's what i'm seeing, just a possibility.
I've seen this video posted about 5 times already
https://twitter.com/maccherokee/status/1324734140667863040?s=20
Dude this shit been posted 300 times already.
Don't know the details. Apparently she is rewriting ballots that they had received that couldn't be counted by the system, but were clearly marked (the ones the man is holding). Apparently the fraud here is, that this was done without GOP observers, but don't know for sure
This is what is happening. But, there really should be poll observers from both sides watching, to make sure that no strangeness occurs.
I don't think this is how it works. You mess up on your ballot, it doesn't get counted.