The proof of transcribing is the bottom question on the middle column. The original ballots are identical except that question and the woman properly fills out that question differently.
The guy across from her has the original ballots. He's reading off to her.
At first it looks like she's just marking the ballots all the same en-masse in a big fraud operation, but the bottom question on the middle column is different between the first and second ballot.
So if this was a "quick, fabricate ballots", they wouldn't be marking various questions differently like that. They'd be marking the ones they want to win, to win.
The proof of transcribing is the bottom question on the middle column. The original ballots are identical except that question and the woman properly fills out that question differently.
The guy across from her has the original ballots. He's reading off to her.
At first it looks like she's just marking the ballots all the same en-masse in a big fraud operation, but the bottom question on the middle column is different between the first and second ballot.
So if this was a "quick, fabricate ballots", they wouldn't be marking various questions differently like that. They'd be marking the ones they want to win, to win.