24
Comments (11)
sorted by:
2
BorisWave 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly!

Seb Gorka squashed this dangerous larp:

https://mobile.twitter.com/SebGorka/status/1324592990959112193

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
raver9876 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most people don't understand how much information can be encoded in a watermark. A modern watermark is not an actual mark made with some type of stamp.

It can be a series of very small, nearly invisible dots that encode information like "Date this ballot was printed." Were some ballots printed AFTER November 3rd?

IF we find out that a crap-ton of Biden votes are on ballots printed AFTER November 3rd, that is **blatant evidence of a voting criminal conspiracy. **

I understand a ballot delayed by poor postal delivery, but if a ballot was printed a day or two AFTER the election, do you see the problem?

** PRINTING AND FILLING OUT BALLOTS AFTER ELECTION DAY IS ILLEGAL BITCHES, PEOPLE WILL GO TO JAIL GUARANTEED.**

1
raver9876 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another way to identify bogus ballots are is identifier number.

If each ballot is supposed to have a unique and distinct number, what happens when we find a bunch of ballots with the same unique ID number.

That means they are not legit and therefore void.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0