While it's true, we have generally up until now sat on our asses. One of the main reasons for doing so is to preserve optics for Trump's re-election. Now that we have crossed that bridge, it puts us into a precarious position. Do we A) Let things play out and allow the left to demonstrate while the media corrals public opinion? Or do we B) Present our dismay through public demonstration and possibly break up the media's control of the public consciousness?. The answer is not an obvious one...especially considering our enemy no doubt understands this crossroad of decisions that we would inevitably face. The truth of how we should conduct ourselves lays somewhere in between the two extremes presented above. We must stand in front of the public and adamently hold that our narrative is the CORRECT narrative (despite censorship)....all the while we need to be stepping around the obvious bear traps laid in front of us. If we go all in, it needs to be an all hands on deck effort. We are not quite there yet but it is getting close. When that moment arrives, no decision will need to be made or coordinated because we'll all know it's time. Until then, we need to keep our heads on but make sure it's on a VERY loose swivel.
Your reasoning is similar to my reasoning up until a certain point. Here's the problem: We are not organized enough to do anything if the need arises. We are splintered through 100 different online communities in an attempt to avoid FB/Twitter overlords but in doing so we have no main place to even communicate with each other. Not to mention the people we have little to no contact with who don't spend a lot of time on the internet. And not to mention the people on places like FB who if they were aware of the information that is being suppressed from them and had a clear single place to go- would at least provide the "neutral" public opinion needed.
Indeed. Its quite the pickle. I think we need to hold strong button down within our own communities first before we start rushing off into the battle that is public opinion and consciousness. We need to firmly confirm what the undeniable evidence to our claims are. We dont have to get to the bottom of every rabbit hole....we just need to find them and preserve them so that we have an unshakable foundation to stand upon. Theres a lot of disinformation and question marks in the air right now and its disorienting to the ones who arent privy to the tactics of it. This is purposefully done and meant to splinter our credibility in the public as well as within our own ranks. Because of this, its best we wait to see what transpires (or doesnt transpire) on the judicial side of things. Whether good or bad, that process alone will provide us with the certainty we are seeking.
Great point. This is why I have been compiling data of dead people and crosschecking obituaries with voter registration files in MI. I have personally seen enough hard evidence. My heart drops every time the result says "voted in 2020" for a confirmed dead person. Eventually this data will be compiled in a clean and secure enough way to prove this thing hopefully. I know someone who is spending $13,500 to do this on a massive scale.
While it's true, we have generally up until now sat on our asses. One of the main reasons for doing so is to preserve optics for Trump's re-election. Now that we have crossed that bridge, it puts us into a precarious position. Do we A) Let things play out and allow the left to demonstrate while the media corrals public opinion? Or do we B) Present our dismay through public demonstration and possibly break up the media's control of the public consciousness?. The answer is not an obvious one...especially considering our enemy no doubt understands this crossroad of decisions that we would inevitably face. The truth of how we should conduct ourselves lays somewhere in between the two extremes presented above. We must stand in front of the public and adamently hold that our narrative is the CORRECT narrative (despite censorship)....all the while we need to be stepping around the obvious bear traps laid in front of us. If we go all in, it needs to be an all hands on deck effort. We are not quite there yet but it is getting close. When that moment arrives, no decision will need to be made or coordinated because we'll all know it's time. Until then, we need to keep our heads on but make sure it's on a VERY loose swivel.
Your reasoning is similar to my reasoning up until a certain point. Here's the problem: We are not organized enough to do anything if the need arises. We are splintered through 100 different online communities in an attempt to avoid FB/Twitter overlords but in doing so we have no main place to even communicate with each other. Not to mention the people we have little to no contact with who don't spend a lot of time on the internet. And not to mention the people on places like FB who if they were aware of the information that is being suppressed from them and had a clear single place to go- would at least provide the "neutral" public opinion needed.
Indeed. Its quite the pickle. I think we need to hold strong button down within our own communities first before we start rushing off into the battle that is public opinion and consciousness. We need to firmly confirm what the undeniable evidence to our claims are. We dont have to get to the bottom of every rabbit hole....we just need to find them and preserve them so that we have an unshakable foundation to stand upon. Theres a lot of disinformation and question marks in the air right now and its disorienting to the ones who arent privy to the tactics of it. This is purposefully done and meant to splinter our credibility in the public as well as within our own ranks. Because of this, its best we wait to see what transpires (or doesnt transpire) on the judicial side of things. Whether good or bad, that process alone will provide us with the certainty we are seeking.
Great point. This is why I have been compiling data of dead people and crosschecking obituaries with voter registration files in MI. I have personally seen enough hard evidence. My heart drops every time the result says "voted in 2020" for a confirmed dead person. Eventually this data will be compiled in a clean and secure enough way to prove this thing hopefully. I know someone who is spending $13,500 to do this on a massive scale.