Oh, you mean like the courts that enabled mail-in ballot receivership and counting days beyond election day, despite evidence in the Constitution that says that can't happen?
Or maybe the court of law that enabled partisan operatives to spy on Trump's campaign, and entrap his associates on bullshit charges?
Or the court of law that has seen evidence that Kyle Rittenhouse acted in self-defense, but is still keeping him in prison?
Or the court of law that has done what it has done to Michael Flynn?
Or maybe the court of law that let Kate Steinle's murderer off the hook?
Are these the courts of law you're referring to, or...?
Oh, maybe you meant SCOTUS, the same SCOTUS that refused to hear cases about the mail-in ballot disaster we're now living through, the same SCOTUS that rewrote civil rights law to include trans and sexual orientation into the definition of "sex."
Shall I continue? I have four years of examples to prove, with evidence, you're wrong. And this is just case in point--you don't even care about evidence either.
Since when has evidenced mattered for anything?
It doesn't in the court of public opinion, but it absolutely does in the court of law.
The democrats are immune to court of law.
No they aren't. They are often protected from prosecution, so they never have to see a courtroom.
Which seems to imply evidence doesn't matter.
Oh, you mean like the courts that enabled mail-in ballot receivership and counting days beyond election day, despite evidence in the Constitution that says that can't happen?
Or maybe the court of law that enabled partisan operatives to spy on Trump's campaign, and entrap his associates on bullshit charges?
Or the court of law that has seen evidence that Kyle Rittenhouse acted in self-defense, but is still keeping him in prison?
Or the court of law that has done what it has done to Michael Flynn?
Or maybe the court of law that let Kate Steinle's murderer off the hook?
Are these the courts of law you're referring to, or...?
Oh, maybe you meant SCOTUS, the same SCOTUS that refused to hear cases about the mail-in ballot disaster we're now living through, the same SCOTUS that rewrote civil rights law to include trans and sexual orientation into the definition of "sex."
Shall I continue? I have four years of examples to prove, with evidence, you're wrong. And this is just case in point--you don't even care about evidence either.
It does in this country. America is not a popularity contest. Or a reality tv show. It's based on the law, we have the highest court in the land.
It does? Since when?
Do I really need to take you on a Ghost of Christmas Past tour of the last 4 years that clearly demonstrates evidence means approximately fuck all?
Thank you, Jim. Same spirit, different skills.
Or the law?