26
posted ago by hondo1 ago by hondo1 +26 / -0

I know, I know, most people think it's fake. I get that, but we've had one of our fellow caterpillars post photographic evidence that it definitely exists (to some extent) and that dude on Owen Shroyer's show sounded pretty legit and should have no realistic reason to lie about something that would be disproven a month later and ruin his 45 ywar career...

So, let's compile anything we hear about it here:

Comments (9)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
OsakaRaccoon 6 points ago +6 / -0

I have confirmed through someone who is a poll worker in TX that at least the QFS Blockchain is indeed real.

5
hondo1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

It has to be the most interesting thing out there right now. It's a very realistic proposal and also something completely unexpected. At the same time, Trump wrote the art of the deal and is undoubtedly an art of war type - I don't see him going into this fight, which he expected, unarmed.

2
Pede_de_pie 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem is that there is so much unconfirmed information about it, and as a result, I don’t think anyone really has a clear understanding of what is happening.

For instance, some claim the ballots are printed at the state level, but others suggested that in 2018 mail in ballots had been moved under the purview of dhs.

Some people say that this can’t work—as a plan—because the scam is not that they are weeding out fake ballots (all the ballots are real) but the fraud is done with ballot harvesting.

From what was explained to me, the qfs blockchain watermark though is not meant to detect real or fake, but it’s a tracking device.

Think of your mail: it most likely went through a series of checkpoints that could be proven by scanning it. Apparently, when the national guard does a recount, they will scan the ballots to see their point of origin, and the path it took to get to “counters”. Harvested ballots would not have passed through the checkpoints, while genuine votes would have gone through several, thereby determining the genuine vote.

But I’m no expert. I’ve just been following all the different posts, a few of the links people offer. I could be wrong or missing something.