-
Now you know why the pollsters wrongly favoured Biden by a wide margin: They needed to indent for the ballot stuffing that they knew was going to occur so that their polling numbers for Biden would match the fake election result.
And then there's the facts that:
-
Biden's "win" is largely attributable to mail-in ballots.
-
And the mass mail-in voting scheme was the result of the covid pandemic.
-
And the covid pandemic was intentionally unleashed on the world by China.
Well it's circumstantial in that it's not direct hard proof of someone physically stuffing ballot boxes, but it's all the peripheral signs that they were up to something no good. That's what "circumstantial" means. It doesn't mean flimsy or speculative.
https://i.imgur.com/cRcQvqj.png
Despite what they say in the movies, circumstantial evidence is still evidence.
There are poll workers on video filling out ballot after ballot, so that is what I am referring to
Oh yeah, that's direct evidence. My examples are circumstantial.