138
posted ago by Glornec ago by Glornec +138 / -0
Comments (15)
sorted by:
7
TakingCoatsWIN 7 points ago +7 / -0

If you know this because you are a lawyer you can contact, also for any lawyers that want to join the fight in general.

Official campaign website for lawyers https://lawyers.donaldjtrump.com/

Official legal fund for donations https://secure.winred.com/djt/defend-the-election-now?utm_source=exc_TW&utm_campaign=a6504d2f&utm_medium=ad

5
djtverystablegenius 5 points ago +5 / -0

You are right sir! Here is the Supreme Court Decision:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-542_i3dj.pdf

2
Trumper007 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is 120k provisional ballots from election day that will favor Trump.

2
GenericInsult 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the USPS fudged the postmarks, how can you tell which ones are valid?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
ImCooCooForCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sticky

1
IndianMemewarVet 1 point ago +1 / -0

With that USPS whistle blower, how can we be sure that other post offices didn't try the backdating thing. If they say it arrived before 8PM now because they had these 3 days to work their magic when the counting was stopped at night.

Even if they say that after 8pm is bad and do the thing, are we going to just accept the blatant fraud?

1
VyseLegendaire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many ballots haven't been counted yet. Unless Biden is up by 50K im not going to take my ball and go home.

1
monochromedout 1 point ago +1 / -0

You left out the important part. We already took this to the court who refused to rule on it before election. This is what Alito said:

opinion accompanying the Supreme Court’s order by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, suggested that the court may still revisit the case after the election and toss out contested mail-in ballots. Although the Supreme Court declined to rule on the matter before the election, Alito wrote that there was a "strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution."

Pennsylvania plans to segregate ballots received after Election Day in case the court takes future legal action to challenge them, CNN reported

1
darkmeatNancy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would this be why MSNBC this morning was hyping up that most provisional ballots are expected to lean to Trump? Call the bluff..

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
monochromedout 0 points ago +1 / -1

There's no way they are going to throw them all out. I see it as applying to anything after election day.

At least what the campaign asked for originally wasn't to throw them all out and that's not what the court took up.

There would be riots if they threw them all out.

2
ThatOneGuyQmart 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any ruling in trumps favor and there will be riots by the left actually there already has been riots by the left so they cant really hold that threat over our heads anymore.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
keepwinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

and we can just take PA vote counters at their word that they will properly separate out the ballots ... smh