You left out the important part. We already took this to the court who refused to rule on it before election. This is what Alito said:
opinion accompanying the Supreme Court’s order by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, suggested that the court may still revisit the case after the election and toss out contested mail-in ballots. Although the Supreme Court declined to rule on the matter before the election, Alito wrote that there was a "strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution."
Pennsylvania plans to segregate ballots received after Election Day in case the court takes future legal action to challenge them, CNN reported
You left out the important part. We already took this to the court who refused to rule on it before election. This is what Alito said:
opinion accompanying the Supreme Court’s order by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, suggested that the court may still revisit the case after the election and toss out contested mail-in ballots. Although the Supreme Court declined to rule on the matter before the election, Alito wrote that there was a "strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution."
Pennsylvania plans to segregate ballots received after Election Day in case the court takes future legal action to challenge them, CNN reported
Would this be why MSNBC this morning was hyping up that most provisional ballots are expected to lean to Trump? Call the bluff..