3246
posted ago by ColombiasFinest ago by ColombiasFinest +3246 / -0

First of all, I assure you this is not a LARP. I’m a very very low level GOP guy in PA. Second, I want to thank whoever first posted this here. Earlier today, someone posted a link to the PA Data site. If you use a desktop, I can walk you through what the site appears to show.

This is a link to a PA state data site that tracks mail ballots requested and whether they were returned.

https://data.pa.gov/d/mcba-yywm/visualization

When you click that link, then click “No thanks” and don’t sign in. From there, there’s a tab marked “Date of Birth”, click the ellipses and select “sort ascending”. It starts with a whole bunch of people born on 1/1/1800 which is a coding tool for domestic violence victims. But if you then go to the bottom “next” button and start scrolling across the pages, there’s literally hundreds upon hundreds of people born between 1850-1920 that not only requested mail in ballots, but also returned them. And the dates are all notated. Many people are 120+ years old.

I assure each of you that this is in the hands of Trump’s lawyers in Philly at this moment.

Comments (206)
sorted by:
168
Trumper007 168 points ago +168 / -0

I have no idea after watching aholes post watermark posts but I believe you Pede. Excellent job!

191
ColombiasFinest [S] 191 points ago +192 / -1

This is no joke my friend. I’m not saying that this proves fraud (to me it does) and it did to our county GOP chairman too. Enough to send it to the State Chairman who then immediately took it to Philly. I don’t want to get everyone’s hopes up but this does prove that what we find here CAN be helpful.

86
JarretGax 86 points ago +87 / -1

The fraud is rampant, keep up the good work.

12
Itsshowtime 12 points ago +12 / -0

For someone that just voted the first time, this has been an eyes wide shut moment because all of these things have been happening for a long time, but the layers of fraud that exist there are literally like 20 different things that they have done to fraud. It has been a sham every step of the way.

53
deleted 53 points ago +53 / -0
48
chuckachookah 48 points ago +48 / -0

Just be careful with that 1800 date. Allegedly PA purposefully obscured the DOB to protect victims of domestic violence.

And that might be the perfect cover to use these as it has a built in libtard excuse (“oh what, you hate battered women?” Or some such nonsense).

Again, Dems will cheat using dead people or battered women, but just saying there’s a potential issue with that.

Seems like the violation of the 8 pm deadline and anything after that is null and void has more law behind it. (But IANAL).

47
ColombiasFinest [S] 47 points ago +47 / -0

Yes thank you. I am OP, that’s in the original post I believe. That’s to protect domestic violence victims. But there’s hundreds upon hundreds over other people 100+ years old that this dataset claims voted

20
emperors_apprentice 20 points ago +20 / -0

Observation: Domestic violence victims sure love voting democrat. Stockholm syndrome perhaps?

13
FlyingK 13 points ago +13 / -0

Or perhaps their information is more readily available via Court Records and Medical Records which allows for other to vote in the victims place. . .

18
Tcrlaf1 18 points ago +18 / -0

What do you think the hundreds of thousand of fake drivers licenses being sent fron China was for?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
28
KAGMAGIC2020 28 points ago +28 / -0

Its crazy that this site would find it when the top brass arent even aware of it thats terrifying and doesnt instill much confidence....

35
ColombiasFinest [S] 35 points ago +35 / -0

Yeah that’s the one part that wasn’t totally clear to me. When exchanging emails with them this afternoon, I still wasn’t clear whether this was new information to the team in Philly or not.

15
K-Harbour 15 points ago +15 / -0

The Trump Campaign people are not the DHS people....so, them not knowing doesn’t mean DHS doesn’t already know.

8
MichellesMingy 8 points ago +8 / -0

Depends on how much confidence you have in DHS? Are they really any better than the FBI?

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +4 / -1

No, not a bit. Chad Wolf said 2018 was the most secure election in modern history. We all have stories of seats being stolen in 2018 by fraud.

6
MichellesMingy 6 points ago +7 / -1

I'm sorry but I have a hard time trusting a guy who wastes his time looking for the mythical white supremacist while joggers and Marxists are burning half the country.

5
CuomoisaMassMurderer 5 points ago +5 / -0

There is SO MUCH fraud that we need all hands on deck.

23
LincolnSteffens 23 points ago +23 / -0

Brother you are a true patriot TY so much.

14
FreeHugs 14 points ago +15 / -1

What's the deal with watermarks? Was that not true?

22
ColombiasFinest [S] 22 points ago +22 / -0

I don’t know anything about that. Honestly the first I heard about that was on here.

1
thebigbear 1 point ago +1 / -0

here is a link

2
NCW2D4TW 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no link

1
6ft7WeighsAnFingTon 1 point ago +2 / -1

Check emerald Robinson Twitter account

10
K-Harbour 10 points ago +12 / -2

Lots not true....

  1. DHS did NOT print everyone’s ballot
  2. different states and large cities used different techniques..
  3. one jurisdiction, their “watermark” was just the Pantone Color to use on their logo.
  4. even if there were a high tech watermark, so what if they printed 50% more ballots than voters? The ballots will appear legit.
  5. The “non-radioactive isotope” is just crazy....no way to test thousands of ballots for an inactive isotope.

HOWEVER. If the USPS used their Anthrax tracing technologies, there would be routing markers placed on the ballots going through the mail. Ballots not going through the mail would be detected, as well as strange routing, and bundles being sent. Supposedly, there is a digital image of front and back of each piece sent. I think that is why Pelosi tried to give USPS $25 billion to upend their in place postal security during the election.

4
Deplora 4 points ago +5 / -1

DHS did not print anyone's ballot, nor provide the paper stock that anyone's ballot was printed on.

USPS was (officially, at least) handling only outer envelopes. Once actual ballots are separated from outer envelopes, as they necessarily have to be for counting to ensure vote secrecy, nothing the USPS did as part of their official operating procedures would be traceable to actual ballots that have been counted (or even just separated from outer envelopes in preparation for counting).

2
the_pragmaticist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only one correction. They would have a count, by force and destination. They would know how many ballots were sent and where they were sent to. This can almost certainly be used against a recount to establish mail in ballots that were counted but never mailed.

1
Deplora 1 point ago +2 / -1

You have more faith in the USPS than I do. They lose mail all the time, and they have no way of knowing who is actually picking up mail from mailboxes. They also have no way of knowing when individual letter carriers are diverting or destroying ballots being mailed either to voters or back to the elections board after the voter completes them. As we've already seen, not only are their individual carriers deliberately mishandling ballots (and other mail), but there are people in USPS management directing workers to backdate postmarks on ballots.

1
the_pragmaticist 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have little faith in the people. The tracking system is a scanner and a database though, and that I can understand, believe, and audit for fuckery.

1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fact that it is even possible to backdate postmarks tells me that the "tracking system" is some government dinosaur, easily manipulated. There's also a lot of variation in USPS equipment across different locations. Much of the country seems to have photo tracking, where customers can sign up to see scans of their incoming mail as it passes through their local post offices, so they can tell if anything that was out for delivery to them either didn't get delivered or got stolen after delivery. But not all locations have that. I'm in a fairly small rural midwestern town, and when I moved here I tried to sign up for that service and got an automated response that it wasn't available in my area. Which areas do and don't have it would certainly be publicly available information, so obviously professional election fraudsters would have it and exploit it.

10
Fenian 10 points ago +13 / -3

If people 120+ are voting, it's safe to say there's no magical blockchain watermarks. As far as I can see there are watermarks on mail in ballots, but aren't particularly advanced.

10
Hairy_Mouse 10 points ago +12 / -2

That's what I keep TELLING people. There's no Hollywood plot twist "gotcha" coming. The whole watermark this is crazy. Even if it WAS true, there's no way they weren't tipped of about it, PLUS those ballets were sent EVERYWHERE by the hundreds of thousands.

They DO have security features, but likely only advanced enough to keep people from recreating them at home. A large scale well funded operation would have absolutely NO problems in duplicating them.

6
Deplora 6 points ago +6 / -0

A large scale well funded operation would have absolutely NO problems in duplicating them.

The large-scale well-funded operation called the DNC would have no need to duplicate any security features in ballot paper-stock or printing. They have ready access to as much of the real stuff as they want.

4
Hairy_Mouse 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, it depends on how it's happening. Are they just printing them out here, or paying China to do it? I know they were having tens of thousands of fraudulent IDs (that actually scan and WORK) shipped in from China to cheat as well.

-1
Deplora -1 points ago +1 / -2

You really think the Dem-controlled unionized print-shop workers here in the US would stand for ballot-printing being outsourced to China?

Fake IDs are a cottage industry and Chinese immigrants in the US can coordinate with Chinese people back in China to manufacture high quality fakes more cheaply than they can be manufactured here. Most of this has nothing to do with voting, but rather for working in the US illegally, and some for spoiled high school and college kids who will pay high prices for fake IDs just so they can get into bars and buy booze.

5
Hairy_Mouse 5 points ago +5 / -0

They actually have an ongoing court case in the state of Texas were some Dems were caught forging votes using these fake IDs.

I imagine that wasn't an isolated incident, especially with the large influx of these fake IDs recently.

0
Fenian 0 points ago +3 / -3

Yeah, it was frustrating to watch people spam it in the chat of one of the election livestreams.

It's a combination of something real, proposed technology, and wishful thinking.

0
RedReddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

How could it be? That would imply ballots were printed at the federal level and not the state level. It's a stupid fag larp

0
Deplora 0 points ago +2 / -2

The whole watermarks thing is utter and complete nonsense. And I strongly suspect it's being pushed by Dem operatives. Make Trump supporters look stupid and keep as many as possible busy ranting about loony "theories" instead of focusing on things that will really help root out fraud and get honest results tallied for this election.

-1
MAGARondonmonson -1 points ago +1 / -2

That was not believably, the first thing I thought of is the Dems will know this some kind of way, it can't be kept secret, and all they have to do is order MORE WATERMARK Ballots in order to cheat.

53
namechangearoo 53 points ago +53 / -0

Doing gods work patriot. We are digging. We are the news now.

13
iamkats 13 points ago +13 / -0

We are a bunch of very nimble navigators. We will prevail!

46
G0vnah 46 points ago +46 / -0

Tell them they need to audit and not recount!!!

46
ColombiasFinest [S] 46 points ago +46 / -0

That’s exactly right. A recount does no good if fraudulent ballots are accepted at face value. An audit is the only way.

14
G0vnah 14 points ago +14 / -0

Thank you so much pede

8
djtverystablegenius 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's gonna be a while. I saw "ADAMS" and assumed it was last name.

I need to build a list of: first, last, dob, county

That is gonna take a while. Might be tomorrow. I dunno.

13
ColombiasFinest [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

Sorry I could have been more specific. My bad. Far left is County. Adams is a county in PA. That’s where Gettysburg is ironically enough.

13
djtverystablegenius 13 points ago +13 / -0

I punch in birthdays and PA and boom. I am getting records.

Website: https://www.dobsearch.com/people-finder/search-dob.php

11
djtverystablegenius 11 points ago +11 / -0
  • First: Alahambra
  • Last: El
  • DoB: 1/1/1900
  • Residence: Philadelphia, PA

I have three records:

  • MAILIN 194th Legislative District (ballot return date: NONE)
  • OLMAILV 182nd Legislative District (ballot return date: 2020-10-10)
  • OLREGV 174th Legislative District (ballot return date: 2020-10-21)

What does this mean?

4
FuckuSpez 4 points ago +4 / -0

Have not looked at actual data but the spreadsheet this guy put together explains the all caps part as the type of ballot. Is there a legend somewhere in the data for the acronyms?

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpPIqqqj/pa-voter-analysis-from-pas-2020g/c/

3
djtverystablegenius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here is the acronym winning. Please give kung-flu an updoot:

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpPGZEKS/pa-voter-data-what-do-these-mail/

4
Espot 4 points ago +6 / -2

How about a REVOTE!?

Stick around and see what else you can pass along!

33
djtverystablegenius 33 points ago +33 / -0

Let us know what you need. We want to help.

Sounds like a list of fraudulent records you can verify independently would help most.

36
ColombiasFinest [S] 36 points ago +36 / -0

Yes. The only issue with this list is that it does not give the names of the people. Only DOB. But it does show that literally someone born in 1850 casted a vote.

35
djtverystablegenius 35 points ago +35 / -0

Okay I was able to pull down 1m records (649 MB) of data. The current game plan is to enrich the data with zip code information from the voting districts.

With last name + dob + zip I should be able to get the full name with high accuracy.

Let's see. I am building the district -> zip code data set I need now.

27
ColombiasFinest [S] 27 points ago +27 / -0

Thank you man. I’m not much of a tech guy and this is the only information I have so far.

Do you think it would help to repost my original message again so more people see it or what? I remember back on the reddit days the more upvotes it got, the more people saw it. I’m not sure how it works now.

13
neehl 13 points ago +13 / -0

I have but one upvote to give. I’ll text my IRL friends to come upvote as well to get it to the top. So many posts have been flooding in, it’s kind of crazy. I think you can request a sticky from a mod by tagging their username too but I don’t know how to do that. I wasn’t on Reddit and am still learning how to do this type of stuff.

23
ColombiasFinest [S] 23 points ago +23 / -0

Thanks. I’m still new too, just joined a day or so ago actually. But I was an OG from T_D under the same username. When we got “quarantined” or whatever over there I didn’t follow and transfer to a new platform with the rest of the group. Instead I ran for office and won (again very very low office). Anyway, it would be amazing to get as many eyes on this as we can and see if we can prove any of these voters are actually dead

5
MichellesMingy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don't get yourself doxxed, brother. Liberals be crazy.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

The 170 year old is probably dead. Just a hunch

7
djtverystablegenius 7 points ago +7 / -0

Re-post and make it super visual. I'll post an example and you can copy it LOL.

One sec.

8
ColombiasFinest [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

I’m doing this from my phone and I’m not very tech savvy. So I’m limited. But I’d like to get more eyes on this. Can Mods still sticky?

6
djtverystablegenius 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't have that pull sadly. Enjoy the show. I gotta build this data so I can start running queries to get first names.

12
djtverystablegenius 12 points ago +12 / -0

Let's see what we can do. Last name + Zip gives me a LOT to work with.

6
Strike_Eagle784 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, u/ColumbiasFinest, please let us know if there's anything we can do to help! I'd be happy to help in anyway I can!

20
TEXinLA 20 points ago +20 / -0

And excluding the domestic violence victims, if the PA cucks give the excuse that sometimes a date is populated when a birthdate is not known - then the registration is NOT VALID.

16
ColombiasFinest [S] 16 points ago +16 / -0

I cannot speak for what the lawyers will do with it, but it’s definitely in their hands. My position is if even 50 assuredly dead people voted (which this shows) the whole vote should immediately be audited

14
TEXinLA 14 points ago +14 / -0

Recall that NC race where the Republican did some sort of ballot harvest and the feds required a new election.

15
Hunterscrackbaby 15 points ago +15 / -0

Holy shit.

Downloaded the data myself to a csv from here: https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficiency-Citizen-Engagement/2020-General-Election-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/mcba-yywm/data

You can filter to get a smaller dataset. Full DL was 446MB

Just a quick looksie...754 people voted in this data who are over 100 yrs old. Eliminating the 1/1/1800 and a couple other weird data points.

164560 mailed ballots without returns

Did not find any under 18 (shocker)

13
ColombiasFinest [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

OP here. That’s the crazy thing, just 100+. How many more dead people aged 90-99 also voted? 80-89? This list could be really helpful.

11
Flcentipede 11 points ago +11 / -0

More than 1300 100+ year olds voted in Detroit. I’m shocked the numbers in PA aren’t higher to be honest. Would be interested to know how many new voters voted absentee. Also how many people who rarely if ever vote mailed one in this time. Both lists would be likely sources of fraudulent ballots (not all of course, but I would bet a significant % of both lists are illegal votes).

4
ColombiasFinest [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Regarding absentee voting, I think that’s listed. There is a column maybe 1 or 2 spots from the left hand side that states type of ballot requested. The PA site gives the abbreviations.

2
Flcentipede 2 points ago +2 / -0

The linked data are all absentee mail ballots, no? But how do we find when the individuals registered and voting history?

4
ColombiasFinest [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

OP here. We don’t know the names. That’s why I posted to hopefully get all the help from our friends here. Regarding the voting history, I don’t have that either. I do know that each county GOP has it however. For example, Philadelphia County GOP would have turnout history if we can get the names of the “voters” listed here

3
Hunterscrackbaby 3 points ago +3 / -0

FYI, in this thread you will always have a little [s] that tells US you are OP :)

If you guys need some data scientists please add me to your list. I'm going to comb PA a bit more

3
ColombiasFinest [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks!

3
traveravis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did not find any under 18 (shocker)

There's 2

05/07/2020 and 07/14/2006

3
KarlHungus53 3 points ago +3 / -0

20,629 voters born before 12/31/1930, of which 17,711 returned ballots. A turnout rate of 86%.

1
KarlHungus53 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there anyway to see last names on these? I would love to see if my 86 y/o grandfather, who just passed away on Monday, and his 72 y/o blind brother voted. If they did, it wasn't because they did it. Last name is Boast and both reside in Wayne County, Forest City and Honesdale respectively.

2
ColombiasFinest [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can sort by DOB. You will need to know that first. Then follow the directions in the original post.

1
DeplorableOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Holy f

1
NCW2D4TW 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many of the 164560 were Republicans

12
Floppydopoulos 12 points ago +12 / -0

Looks like 70-30 Dems-Reps. Wonder how they voted

28
ColombiasFinest [S] 28 points ago +28 / -0

The crazy thing is party registration doesn’t even matter. Some Dem operative can request an R ballot and cast it for Biden.

12
TearofLys 12 points ago +12 / -0

Appeared to happen in Michigan. Most who requested mail in ballots were registered Republicans, but somehow the ballots broke overwhelmingly for Biden. Just doesn't make sense

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-elections/michigan-results

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
11
Donnybiceps 11 points ago +11 / -0

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKizyVg/people-born-on-1800-voted-in-pen/c/

This is my original post, im not taking full credit but the one of aome to highlight this abnormality.

10
ColombiasFinest [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

Thank you so much bro! As I mentioned, I saw someone posted this earlier and I checked it out. It was the real deal. And I took to state GOP. Thank you so much man!

4
psyop 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks for doing that!

5
psyop 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're awesome! Thanks, Pede!

11
blacktankguy 11 points ago +11 / -0

Thanks for the update!

10
Trumpnado_warning 10 points ago +10 / -0

Just some quick calculations, but 85.8% of "voters" aged 90+ voted in this election, according to that data (if you remove the DM victims and 01/01/1900 cases). 81.3% of people aged 100+ voted.
Way higher than normal participation rate. For comparison, only 56% of the US population voted in the presidential race in 2016. Edit: That's giving them the benefit of the doubt that these people are even alive, including the pre-Civil War voters.

8
djtverystablegenius 8 points ago +9 / -1

Looking at it now... this is good. Let's see what else we can dig up for you. 1900 was a good birth year for mail in voters wow.

7
XxZ3AL0TxX 7 points ago +8 / -1

🙌🇺🇲

7
Tusculan2 7 points ago +8 / -1

Great job!

7
Mrs_Fonebone 7 points ago +8 / -1

WOW.

6
merf 6 points ago +7 / -1

Really appreciate the background on the 1/1/1800 dates.

7
ColombiasFinest [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

No problem. I don’t want anyone to go down a rabbit hole. Our country is at stake and I know you and I both don’t want that decided in some back room in Detroit or Philly

1
ShadilayEveryDay 1 point ago +1 / -0

could this also be the case for Michigan January 1900 dates?

6
Cbllbc 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thanks for the clear instructions.

If I followed it correctly, I am seeing 1157 people voted from Pennsylvania that are 100 years old or older. Can we get Guinness World Record to verify and properly award these dead people?

6
Donald4thewin 6 points ago +6 / -0

God bless and thank you

6
marvelwall 6 points ago +7 / -1

just did what you instructed. holy crap.. that's literally insanity. it's blatantly right there..

8
ColombiasFinest [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

That’s what I took it to my county chairman today and it’s in the hands of DJT’s lawyers in Philly tonight. Let’s keep digging Patriot!

2
Womp_Womp2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pam Bondi??

3
ColombiasFinest [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

No I didn’t speak with her today. But rest assured the team has this in their hands.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
2
ColombiasFinest [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good catch!

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

That ... might not be a legal voter?

Can we condense all the findings of fraud into one document?

6
Ou812ou812 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is this data available for other states

8
ColombiasFinest [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

I don’t know. I’m just a low level GOP elected guy in PA. Can’t speak for other states. But it was seriously enough for our state Chairman to take immediately to Philly this afternoon.

6
PewPew_ThaDuK 6 points ago +6 / -0

WE ARE GOING TO SAVE THE REPUBLIC!!!

6
modded 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
red_holiday2 5 points ago +6 / -1

What is the PA GOP doing for down ballot canidates. I might regret putting this information out there, but I live in Chester county and the republican canidates are now losing in our county when they were up on 11/4 at 7 am. I notice the democrats are only winning because of mail in votes unless I am interpeting it wrong. Please excuse the spelling the mistakes.

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't worry. Lots of people live in Chester County.

3
ColombiasFinest [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sorry man, I’m not in that area and can’t speak to what the local party is doing in your county.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
6
ColombiasFinest [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just doing my part fellow patriot

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which is more than so many on payroll to do just that ...

5
Carlos142857 5 points ago +5 / -0

It almost appears that the Postal Service is heavily involved in this massive fraud. Where are they mailing the ballots to, and who is sending the ballots back? This is some mind blowing stuff.

2
ColombiasFinest [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unfortunately I don’t have the answers to this. But hopefully this group can dig and possibly uncover more.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Almost?" Need I tell you of the nightmares here in WI re: our primary in April?

5
5
ColombiasFinest [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

BOOM! This is real man! I’m glad they’re picking this up and running. We need more people looking at this.

2
LuckyEwe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hard to do, with Twitter hiding it completely with a disclaimer. Hopefully it catches steam!

"Some or all of the content shared in this Tweet is disputed and might be misleading about an election or other civic process."

5
emperors_apprentice 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have an offline sqlite db copy of this if you need. (if this gets taken down by corrupt state attorneys)

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
Opie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for sharing!

4
cryptoconservative 4 points ago +4 / -0

How can I find this type of visualization for my own state? (CO)

People around Colorado are bragging about how we're the highest voter turnout of any state in any election...but I think it's because our Dem Colorado Sec. of State didn't clean the voter rolls (which she is being sued for in district court currently).

3
ColombiasFinest [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wish I knew. I am a PA guy, so I’m not really sure where that might be located. We need some CO guys in here.

3
cryptoconservative 3 points ago +3 / -0

I found the data through CO Sec. of State and other state websites. The data of majority aged voters and the reported registered voters in the state matched, thankfully.

Everyone in every state should be checking this.

4
newSpezAccount 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good find, crazy how some of these 'low hanging fruit' finds are out there for you diligent folks. Did someone really think they cheat using people born in the 1800's?

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Short answer: yes.

Long answer: yes

4
jackwerntz 4 points ago +4 / -0

I am honored to have you hear with us, man. Makes all the difference.

5
ColombiasFinest [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thanks man. I appreciate your kind words. Just doing my part and spreading it to the group to get as many eyes on this as possible.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Virtual_Crow 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you. There is no way to hide this fraud anymore. I am horribly blackpilled right now and haven't been saying much lately, but you give me hope.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hang in there, patriot. We've got heavy hitters in tech crunching numbers and coming up with solid evidence. Keep an eye on the Courts, to see if they do the right thing. If not, we get one night to fix this.

4
KarlHungus53 4 points ago +4 / -0

86% return rate for voters 90+ years old. Yeah right...

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look at Milwaukee, it's even higher. Such patriotic enthusiasm

4
Patriot_Toast 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fight the good fight! Your service guarantees citizenship!

4
Strike_Eagle784 4 points ago +4 / -0

Awesome, thank you so much! Keep up the good fight!

3
SevenThunders 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you know if there will be a comprehensive audit of the ballots? I'd imagine you would check to see if signatures matched, check to see if they are alive and registered and living in the county, check the postal mark but also look at the postal imaging that must occur for every item of mail sent and received, by the USPS.

While those may have been faked, those digital pictures will have embedded data, such exif data that includes the all important time stamp! Good forensics might uncover a lot of fraudulent votes.

3
MagaChief 3 points ago +3 / -0

**** IMPORTANT ****

Has anyone been able to export all 3 million records? I have tried multiple times and only get 1million roughly each time.

3
RedRaven 3 points ago +4 / -1

Thanks for your work!

3
GBA4ever 3 points ago +4 / -1

Thanks for the info!

3
big8s 3 points ago +4 / -1

You are a real patriot. Thank you.

4
ColombiasFinest [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks! Right back at you patriot!

3
jackasskicker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you.

3
Milkpowder44 3 points ago +4 / -1

Great find!!

3
JesusisKing 3 points ago +3 / -0

AMEN!!!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
wannabe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you patriot.

2
LoadedMonk 2 points ago +2 / -0

500 of these don't even have a birth date listed?

3
ColombiasFinest [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

And you need a DOB to register to vote in PA.