First of all, I assure you this is not a LARP. I’m a very very low level GOP guy in PA. Second, I want to thank whoever first posted this here. Earlier today, someone posted a link to the PA Data site. If you use a desktop, I can walk you through what the site appears to show.
This is a link to a PA state data site that tracks mail ballots requested and whether they were returned.
https://data.pa.gov/d/mcba-yywm/visualization
When you click that link, then click “No thanks” and don’t sign in. From there, there’s a tab marked “Date of Birth”, click the ellipses and select “sort ascending”. It starts with a whole bunch of people born on 1/1/1800 which is a coding tool for domestic violence victims. But if you then go to the bottom “next” button and start scrolling across the pages, there’s literally hundreds upon hundreds of people born between 1850-1920 that not only requested mail in ballots, but also returned them. And the dates are all notated. Many people are 120+ years old.
I assure each of you that this is in the hands of Trump’s lawyers in Philly at this moment.
I have no idea after watching aholes post watermark posts but I believe you Pede. Excellent job!
This is no joke my friend. I’m not saying that this proves fraud (to me it does) and it did to our county GOP chairman too. Enough to send it to the State Chairman who then immediately took it to Philly. I don’t want to get everyone’s hopes up but this does prove that what we find here CAN be helpful.
The fraud is rampant, keep up the good work.
For someone that just voted the first time, this has been an eyes wide shut moment because all of these things have been happening for a long time, but the layers of fraud that exist there are literally like 20 different things that they have done to fraud. It has been a sham every step of the way.
Just be careful with that 1800 date. Allegedly PA purposefully obscured the DOB to protect victims of domestic violence.
And that might be the perfect cover to use these as it has a built in libtard excuse (“oh what, you hate battered women?” Or some such nonsense).
Again, Dems will cheat using dead people or battered women, but just saying there’s a potential issue with that.
Seems like the violation of the 8 pm deadline and anything after that is null and void has more law behind it. (But IANAL).
Yes thank you. I am OP, that’s in the original post I believe. That’s to protect domestic violence victims. But there’s hundreds upon hundreds over other people 100+ years old that this dataset claims voted
Observation: Domestic violence victims sure love voting democrat. Stockholm syndrome perhaps?
What do you think the hundreds of thousand of fake drivers licenses being sent fron China was for?
Its crazy that this site would find it when the top brass arent even aware of it thats terrifying and doesnt instill much confidence....
Yeah that’s the one part that wasn’t totally clear to me. When exchanging emails with them this afternoon, I still wasn’t clear whether this was new information to the team in Philly or not.
The Trump Campaign people are not the DHS people....so, them not knowing doesn’t mean DHS doesn’t already know.
There is SO MUCH fraud that we need all hands on deck.
Brother you are a true patriot TY so much.
What's the deal with watermarks? Was that not true?
I don’t know anything about that. Honestly the first I heard about that was on here.
here is a link
There is no link
Lots not true....
HOWEVER. If the USPS used their Anthrax tracing technologies, there would be routing markers placed on the ballots going through the mail. Ballots not going through the mail would be detected, as well as strange routing, and bundles being sent. Supposedly, there is a digital image of front and back of each piece sent. I think that is why Pelosi tried to give USPS $25 billion to upend their in place postal security during the election.
DHS did not print anyone's ballot, nor provide the paper stock that anyone's ballot was printed on.
USPS was (officially, at least) handling only outer envelopes. Once actual ballots are separated from outer envelopes, as they necessarily have to be for counting to ensure vote secrecy, nothing the USPS did as part of their official operating procedures would be traceable to actual ballots that have been counted (or even just separated from outer envelopes in preparation for counting).
Only one correction. They would have a count, by force and destination. They would know how many ballots were sent and where they were sent to. This can almost certainly be used against a recount to establish mail in ballots that were counted but never mailed.
If people 120+ are voting, it's safe to say there's no magical blockchain watermarks. As far as I can see there are watermarks on mail in ballots, but aren't particularly advanced.
That's what I keep TELLING people. There's no Hollywood plot twist "gotcha" coming. The whole watermark this is crazy. Even if it WAS true, there's no way they weren't tipped of about it, PLUS those ballets were sent EVERYWHERE by the hundreds of thousands.
They DO have security features, but likely only advanced enough to keep people from recreating them at home. A large scale well funded operation would have absolutely NO problems in duplicating them.
The large-scale well-funded operation called the DNC would have no need to duplicate any security features in ballot paper-stock or printing. They have ready access to as much of the real stuff as they want.
Yeah, it was frustrating to watch people spam it in the chat of one of the election livestreams.
It's a combination of something real, proposed technology, and wishful thinking.
How could it be? That would imply ballots were printed at the federal level and not the state level. It's a stupid fag larp
The whole watermarks thing is utter and complete nonsense. And I strongly suspect it's being pushed by Dem operatives. Make Trump supporters look stupid and keep as many as possible busy ranting about loony "theories" instead of focusing on things that will really help root out fraud and get honest results tallied for this election.
That was not believably, the first thing I thought of is the Dems will know this some kind of way, it can't be kept secret, and all they have to do is order MORE WATERMARK Ballots in order to cheat.