3246
posted ago by ColombiasFinest ago by ColombiasFinest +3246 / -0

First of all, I assure you this is not a LARP. I’m a very very low level GOP guy in PA. Second, I want to thank whoever first posted this here. Earlier today, someone posted a link to the PA Data site. If you use a desktop, I can walk you through what the site appears to show.

This is a link to a PA state data site that tracks mail ballots requested and whether they were returned.

https://data.pa.gov/d/mcba-yywm/visualization

When you click that link, then click “No thanks” and don’t sign in. From there, there’s a tab marked “Date of Birth”, click the ellipses and select “sort ascending”. It starts with a whole bunch of people born on 1/1/1800 which is a coding tool for domestic violence victims. But if you then go to the bottom “next” button and start scrolling across the pages, there’s literally hundreds upon hundreds of people born between 1850-1920 that not only requested mail in ballots, but also returned them. And the dates are all notated. Many people are 120+ years old.

I assure each of you that this is in the hands of Trump’s lawyers in Philly at this moment.

Comments (206)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
14
FreeHugs 14 points ago +15 / -1

What's the deal with watermarks? Was that not true?

22
ColombiasFinest [S] 22 points ago +22 / -0

I don’t know anything about that. Honestly the first I heard about that was on here.

1
thebigbear 1 point ago +1 / -0

here is a link

2
NCW2D4TW 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no link

1
6ft7WeighsAnFingTon 1 point ago +2 / -1

Check emerald Robinson Twitter account

10
K-Harbour 10 points ago +12 / -2

Lots not true....

  1. DHS did NOT print everyone’s ballot
  2. different states and large cities used different techniques..
  3. one jurisdiction, their “watermark” was just the Pantone Color to use on their logo.
  4. even if there were a high tech watermark, so what if they printed 50% more ballots than voters? The ballots will appear legit.
  5. The “non-radioactive isotope” is just crazy....no way to test thousands of ballots for an inactive isotope.

HOWEVER. If the USPS used their Anthrax tracing technologies, there would be routing markers placed on the ballots going through the mail. Ballots not going through the mail would be detected, as well as strange routing, and bundles being sent. Supposedly, there is a digital image of front and back of each piece sent. I think that is why Pelosi tried to give USPS $25 billion to upend their in place postal security during the election.

4
Deplora 4 points ago +5 / -1

DHS did not print anyone's ballot, nor provide the paper stock that anyone's ballot was printed on.

USPS was (officially, at least) handling only outer envelopes. Once actual ballots are separated from outer envelopes, as they necessarily have to be for counting to ensure vote secrecy, nothing the USPS did as part of their official operating procedures would be traceable to actual ballots that have been counted (or even just separated from outer envelopes in preparation for counting).

2
the_pragmaticist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only one correction. They would have a count, by force and destination. They would know how many ballots were sent and where they were sent to. This can almost certainly be used against a recount to establish mail in ballots that were counted but never mailed.

1
Deplora 1 point ago +2 / -1

You have more faith in the USPS than I do. They lose mail all the time, and they have no way of knowing who is actually picking up mail from mailboxes. They also have no way of knowing when individual letter carriers are diverting or destroying ballots being mailed either to voters or back to the elections board after the voter completes them. As we've already seen, not only are their individual carriers deliberately mishandling ballots (and other mail), but there are people in USPS management directing workers to backdate postmarks on ballots.

10
Fenian 10 points ago +13 / -3

If people 120+ are voting, it's safe to say there's no magical blockchain watermarks. As far as I can see there are watermarks on mail in ballots, but aren't particularly advanced.

10
Hairy_Mouse 10 points ago +12 / -2

That's what I keep TELLING people. There's no Hollywood plot twist "gotcha" coming. The whole watermark this is crazy. Even if it WAS true, there's no way they weren't tipped of about it, PLUS those ballets were sent EVERYWHERE by the hundreds of thousands.

They DO have security features, but likely only advanced enough to keep people from recreating them at home. A large scale well funded operation would have absolutely NO problems in duplicating them.

6
Deplora 6 points ago +6 / -0

A large scale well funded operation would have absolutely NO problems in duplicating them.

The large-scale well-funded operation called the DNC would have no need to duplicate any security features in ballot paper-stock or printing. They have ready access to as much of the real stuff as they want.

4
Hairy_Mouse 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, it depends on how it's happening. Are they just printing them out here, or paying China to do it? I know they were having tens of thousands of fraudulent IDs (that actually scan and WORK) shipped in from China to cheat as well.

0
Fenian 0 points ago +3 / -3

Yeah, it was frustrating to watch people spam it in the chat of one of the election livestreams.

It's a combination of something real, proposed technology, and wishful thinking.

0
RedReddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

How could it be? That would imply ballots were printed at the federal level and not the state level. It's a stupid fag larp

0
Deplora 0 points ago +2 / -2

The whole watermarks thing is utter and complete nonsense. And I strongly suspect it's being pushed by Dem operatives. Make Trump supporters look stupid and keep as many as possible busy ranting about loony "theories" instead of focusing on things that will really help root out fraud and get honest results tallied for this election.